IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i9p5128-d801091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge and Expectations Regarding Sustainable Food Systems among Students from Georgian Agricultural Universities and Georgian Food Industry Representatives

Author

Listed:
  • Allan Estandarte

    (Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, University of Kassel, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany)

  • Tekla Gurgenidze

    (School of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, Agricultural University of Georgia, 0159 Tbilisi, Georgia)

  • Teo Urushadze

    (School of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, Agricultural University of Georgia, 0159 Tbilisi, Georgia)

  • Angelika Ploeger

    (Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, University of Kassel, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany)

Abstract

This study establishes the role of sustainability in higher education (HE) and the food industry in Georgia by examining Sustainable Food Systems (SFS) background knowledge among students and food industry representatives, their behaviours as consumers, and their level of food citizenship. This study also investigates the most interesting SFS topics in relation to future training, students’ expectations in developing competencies, and the SFS elements they deem most important. This cross-sectional study was performed through an online survey comprising a higher education questionnaire administered in five agricultural universities in Georgia which obtained 321 responses. Another questionnaire administered to Georgian food industry (FI) representatives obtained 54 responses. Data were analysed through non-parametric and multivariate statistical analysis. Georgian students and food industry representatives were knowledgeable on Sustainable Food Systems topics, yet some were neither interested nor had received training previous training in SFS. Students’ food purchasing and consumption motivations are most influenced by taste and health, demonstrating significant differences between universities. The maintenance of healthy ecosystems was the most important component of SFS, while organic agriculture and agroecology are the most interesting topics. In Georgia, higher education and the food industry both play equally essential roles in the development of Sustainable Food Systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Allan Estandarte & Tekla Gurgenidze & Teo Urushadze & Angelika Ploeger, 2022. "Knowledge and Expectations Regarding Sustainable Food Systems among Students from Georgian Agricultural Universities and Georgian Food Industry Representatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5128-:d:801091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5128/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/9/5128/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Wezel & Julia Goette & Elisabeth Lagneaux & Gloria Passuello & Erica Reisman & Christophe Rodier & Grégoire Turpin, 2018. "Agroecology in Europe: Research, Education, Collective Action Networks, and Alternative Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Fuchs Doris & Kalfagianni Agni, 2010. "The Causes and Consequences of Private Food Governance," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 1-36, October.
    3. Rami Al Sidawi & Teo Urushadze & Angelika Ploeger, 2020. "Changes in Dairy Products Value Chain in Georgia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-29, July.
    4. Fuchs, Doris & Kalfagianni, Agni, 2010. "The Causes and Consequences of Private Food Governance," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 1-34, October.
    5. Rau, Henrike & Goggins, Gary & Fahy, Frances, 2018. "From invisibility to impact: Recognising the scientific and societal relevance of interdisciplinary sustainability research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 266-276.
    6. Paola Migliorini & Geir Lieblein, 2016. "Facilitating Transformation and Competence Development in Sustainable Agriculture University Education: An Experiential and Action Oriented Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ronja Teschner & Jessica Ruppen & Basil Bornemann & Rony Emmenegger & Lucía Aguirre Sánchez, 2021. "Mapping Sustainable Diets: A Comparison of Sustainability References in Dietary Guidelines of Swiss Food Governance Actors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Anna Clare Bull & Jagjit Plahe & Lachlan Gregory, 2021. "International Investment Agreements and the Escalation of Private Power in the Global Agri-Food System," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(3), pages 519-533, May.
    3. Schleifer, Philip & Fiorini, Matteo & Fransen, Luc, 2019. "Missing the Bigger Picture: A Population-level Analysis of Transnational Private Governance Organizations Active in the Global South," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    4. S. Henson & J. Humphrey, 2012. "Private Standards in Global Agri-Food Chains," Chapters, in: Axel Marx & Miet Maertens & Johan Swinnen & Jan Wouters (ed.), Private Standards and Global Governance, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Godswill Ntsomboh Ntsefong & Hermine Ngalle-Bille & Walter Ajambang & Benoit Constant Likeng-Li-Ngue & Tabi-Mbi Kingsley & Joseph Martin Bell & Emmanuel Youmbi, 2016. "Brief Review on the Controversies around Oil Palm (Elaeis Guineensis Jacq.) Production and Palm Oil Consumption," International Journal of Regional Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(2), pages 1-60, December.
    6. Agni Kalfagianni, 2014. "Addressing the Global Sustainability Challenge: The Potential and Pitfalls of Private Governance from the Perspective of Human Capabilities," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 307-320, June.
    7. Büthe Tim, 2010. "Private Regulation in the Global Economy: A (P)Review," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 1-40, October.
    8. Jung, Suhyun & Polasky, Stephen, 2018. "Partnerships to prevent deforestation in the Amazon," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 498-516.
    9. Wenlong He & Wei Yang & Seong-jin Choi, 2018. "The Interplay Between Private and Public Regulations: Evidence from ISO 14001 Adoption Among Chinese Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 477-497, October.
    10. Kate Barclay & Alice Miller, 2018. "The Sustainable Seafood Movement Is a Governance Concert, with the Audience Playing a Key Role," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Defne Gonenc & Dario Piselli & Yixian Sun, 2020. "The global economic system and access and allocation in earth system governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 223-238, June.
    12. Laura Kurth & Pieter Glasbergen, 2017. "Serving a heterogeneous Muslim identity? Private governance arrangements of halal food in the Netherlands," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(1), pages 103-118, March.
    13. Maria Paula Escobar & David Demeritt, 2017. "Paperwork and the decoupling of audit and animal welfare: The challenges of materiality for better regulation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(1), pages 169-190, February.
    14. Vivica I. Kraak & Kim L. Niewolny, 2024. "A Scoping Review of Food Systems Governance Frameworks and Models to Develop a Typology for Social Change Movements to Transform Food Systems for People and Planetary Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Elena Fagotto, 2014. "Private roles in food safety provision: the law and economics of private food safety," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 83-109, February.
    16. Baudot, Lisa & Cooper, David J., 2022. "Regulatory mandates and responses to uncomfortable knowledge: The case of country-by-country reporting in the extractive sector," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Phoebe Stephens, 2021. "Social Finance Investing for a Resilient Food Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Shoshanna Griver & Itay Fischhendler, 2021. "The Social Construction of Food Security: The Israeli Case," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(5), pages 1303-1321, October.
    19. Thiemann Matthias, 2014. "The impact of meta-standardization upon standards convergence: the case of the international accounting standard for off-balance-sheet financing," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 79-112, April.
    20. Martha McMahon, 2013. "What Food is to be Kept Safe and for Whom? Food-Safety Governance in an Unsafe Food System," Laws, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-27, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:9:p:5128-:d:801091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.