IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p4030-d782150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gaps in Regulation and Policies on the Application of Green Technologies at Household Level in the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • Imma Bortone

    (Cranfield Water Sciences Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Hacer Sakar

    (Cranfield Water Sciences Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Ana Soares

    (Cranfield Water Sciences Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, UK)

Abstract

Green technologies (Green-Tech) are solutions aiming to mitigate or reverse the effects of human activity on the environment. The United Kingdom (UK) government established a Ten-Point Plan and over GBP 5 billion to support Green-Tech to lay the foundations for a green industrial revolution and reduce emissions by 180 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO 2 e) by 2032. Households and buildings contribute around 40% of the UK’s total GHG emissions, which implies that key actions are needed in all areas around the building sector (Point 7). This study provides an overview and analysis of the existing regulation and standards in the UK building/household sector, to understand the current state-of-the-art and identify gaps preventing Green-Tech wider implementation and use. Discrepancies in regulation and standards were identified. Given that households bring together and adhere to numerous standards and regulations, the analysis highlighted that it is critical to formulate relevant actions starting from the individuals with engagement and information. Complete and clear guidelines addressing environmental awareness, the performance and economical convenience of Green-Tech implementation and related regulations, are required to come to a consensus on the best way to move forward to achieve sustainability and NET-ZERO targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Imma Bortone & Hacer Sakar & Ana Soares, 2022. "Gaps in Regulation and Policies on the Application of Green Technologies at Household Level in the United Kingdom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4030-:d:782150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4030/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/4030/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hélène Littke, 2015. "Planning the Green Walkable City: Conceptualizing Values and Conflicts for Urban Green Space Strategies in Stockholm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-15, August.
    2. McAndrew, Ryan & Mulcahy, Rory & Gordon, Ross & Russell-Bennett, Rebekah, 2021. "Household energy efficiency interventions: A systematic literature review," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Andrea Chegut & Piet Eichholtz & Nils Kok, 2014. "Supply, Demand and the Value of Green Buildings," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(1), pages 22-43, January.
    4. Queena K. Qian & Edwin H. W. Chan & Abd Ghani Khalid, 2015. "Challenges in Delivering Green Building Projects: Unearthing the Transaction Costs (TCs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Aguilar, J. & Garces-Jimenez, A. & R-Moreno, M.D. & García, Rodrigo, 2021. "A systematic literature review on the use of artificial intelligence in energy self-management in smart buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Albert Ping Chuen Chan & Amos Darko & Ernest Effah Ameyaw, 2017. "Strategies for Promoting Green Building Technologies Adoption in the Construction Industry—An International Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chee Keong Khoo & Xin Li & Jianxiang Huang, 2022. "Green Behaviors and Green Buildings: A Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Public Housing Estates in Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Jānis Krūmiņš & Māris Kļaviņš, 2022. "The Baltic States’ Move toward a Sustainable Energy Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-31, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hala Sanboskani & Mounir El Asmar & Elie Azar, 2022. "Green Building Contractors 2025: Analyzing and Forecasting Green Building Contractors’ Market Trends in the US," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Asuamah Yeboah, Samuel, 2024. "Navigating the Nexus: Overcoming Challenges in Public-Private Partnerships for Sustainable Building Initiatives in Developing Countries," MPRA Paper 122667, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Nov 2024.
    3. David T. Tan & Yi Gong & José Gabriel Siri, 2017. "The Impact of Subsidies on the Prevalence of Climate-Sensitive Residential Buildings in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Ioannis Vardopoulos & Ioannis Vannas & George Xydis & Constantinos Vassiliades, 2023. "Homeowners’ Perceptions of Renewable Energy and Market Value of Sustainable Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Hong Xue & Shoujian Zhang & Yikun Su & Zezhou Wu, 2017. "Factors Affecting the Capital Cost of Prefabrication—A Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Wenxin Shen & Wenzhe Tang & Atthaset Siripanan & Zhen Lei & Colin F. Duffield & Felix Kin Peng Hui, 2018. "Understanding the Green Technical Capabilities and Barriers to Green Buildings in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Pierluigi Morano & Francesco Tajani & Felicia Di Liddo & Paola Amoruso, 2024. "A Feasibility Analysis of Energy Retrofit Initiatives Aimed at the Existing Property Assets Decarbonisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Wang, Moran & Li, Xuerong & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "Discovering research trends and opportunities of green finance and energy policy: A data-driven scientometric analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Burlinson, Andrew & Giulietti, Monica & Law, Cherry & Liu, Hui-Hsuan, 2021. "Fuel poverty and financial distress," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Chegut, Andrea & Eichholtz, Piet & Kok, Nils, 2019. "The price of innovation: An analysis of the marginal cost of green buildings," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. Meera P. S. & Lavanya V., 2023. "Nature-Inspired Algorithms for Energy Management Systems: A Review," International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research (IJSIR), IGI Global, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Eichholtz, Piet & Holtermans, Rogier & Kok, Nils & Yönder, Erkan, 2019. "Environmental performance and the cost of debt: Evidence from commercial mortgages and REIT bonds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 19-32.
    13. Wei Wang & Shoujian Zhang & Yikun Su & Xinyang Deng, 2019. "An Empirical Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Adoption and Diffusion of GBTS in the Construction Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    14. Yuemei Zhu & Junxiang Ding & Qing Zhu & Yang Cheng & Qiuchen Ma & Xuze Ji, 2017. "The Impact of Green Open Space on Community Attachment—A Case Study of Three Communities in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Lavinia Poruschi & John Gardner, 2022. "Energy Disadvantage and Housing: Considerations Towards Establishing a Long Run Integrated Analysis Framework," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 55(4), pages 530-540, December.
    16. Guo, Jingyu & Mallinson, Daniel J. & Ortiz, Selena E. & Domenica Iulo, Lisa, 2024. "Collaborative governance challenges in energy efficiency and conservation: The case of Pennsylvania," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    17. Chegut, Andrea & Eichholtz, Piet & Holtermans, Rogier, 2016. "Energy efficiency and economic value in affordable housing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 39-49.
    18. Jam Shahzaib Khan & Rozana Zakaria & Siti Mazzuana Shamsudin & Nur Izie Adiana Abidin & Shaza Rina Sahamir & Darul Nafis Abbas & Eeydzah Aminudin, 2019. "Evolution to Emergence of Green Buildings: A Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    19. Fabrizio M. Amoruso & Min-Hee Sonn & Soyeon Chu & Thorsten Schuetze, 2021. "Sustainable Building Legislation and Incentives in Korea: A Case-Study-Based Comparison of Building New and Renovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-41, April.
    20. Kosa Golić & Vesna Kosorić & Slavica Stamatovic Vuckovic & Kosara Kujundzic, 2023. "Strategies for Realization of Socially Sustainable Residential Buildings: Experts’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-31, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:4030-:d:782150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.