IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i6p969-d100667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategies for Promoting Green Building Technologies Adoption in the Construction Industry—An International Study

Author

Listed:
  • Albert Ping Chuen Chan

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 11 Yuk Choi Rd, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)

  • Amos Darko

    (Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 11 Yuk Choi Rd, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China)

  • Ernest Effah Ameyaw

    (School of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Coventry University, Coventry CV3 1NZ, UK)

Abstract

Because green building technologies (GBTs) adoption is a promising way of ameliorating the sustainability performance of buildings, GBTs are receiving increased interest in the global construction community. The barriers to the adoption of GBTs, such as higher cost and lack of awareness, further indicate that proper strategies need to be devised for promoting the wider adoption of GBTs in buildings development. However, there exist limited empirical studies identifying the strategies for promoting GBTs adoption in the construction industry. This study aims to identify the strategies that are important for promoting GBTs adoption in construction. After a comprehensive literature review to identify strategies for the promotion of GBTs adoption, empirical data were gleaned through a questionnaire survey with 104 green building experts around the world. The analysis results validated the importance of all of the 12 promotion strategies used for the study. Green building experts from different countries and with different backgrounds had significant agreement on the relative importance ranking of the promotion strategies. Furthermore, “financial and further market-based incentives for GBTs adopters”, “availability of better information on cost and benefits of GBTs”, “mandatory governmental policies and regulations”, and “green rating and labeling” were identified as the top four important promotion strategies. The research findings provide a valuable reference to assist practitioners and policy makers in developing practical strategies for promoting GBTs adoption to eventually achieve the sustainable development of buildings. From the perspective of international experts, this study adds to the green building literature by offering empirical evidence of the important strategies for promoting GBTs adoption in the construction industry. Future research will investigate the interrelationships among the promotion strategies and their impacts on the GBTs adoption process.

Suggested Citation

  • Albert Ping Chuen Chan & Amos Darko & Ernest Effah Ameyaw, 2017. "Strategies for Promoting Green Building Technologies Adoption in the Construction Industry—An International Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:969-:d:100667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/969/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/969/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Dong-Xue & He, Bao-Jie & Johnson, Christine & Mou, Ben, 2015. "Social problems of green buildings: From the humanistic needs to social acceptance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1594-1609.
    2. Abimbola Olukemi Windapo, 2014. "Examination of Green Building Drivers in the South African Construction Industry: Economics versus Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Zhang, Xiaoling, 2015. "Green real estate development in China: State of art and prospect agenda—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-13.
    4. Weifeng Yang & Yuelei Zhang, 2012. "Research on factors of green purchasing practices of Chinese," E3 Journal of Business Management and Economics., E3 Journals, vol. 3(5), pages 222-231.
    5. Shazmin, S.A.A. & Sipan, I. & Sapri, M., 2016. "Property tax assessment incentives for green building: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 536-548.
    6. Queena K. Qian & Edwin H. W. Chan & Abd Ghani Khalid, 2015. "Challenges in Delivering Green Building Projects: Unearthing the Transaction Costs (TCs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Fei Xue & Zhonghua Gou & Stephen Siu Yu Lau, 2016. "Human Factors in Green Office Building Design: The Impact of Workplace Green Features on Health Perceptions in High-Rise High-Density Asian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Yuemei Zhu & Junxiang Ding & Qing Zhu & Yang Cheng & Qiuchen Ma & Xuze Ji, 2017. "The Impact of Green Open Space on Community Attachment—A Case Study of Three Communities in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Niamh Murtagh & Aeli Roberts & Richard Hind, 2016. "The relationship between motivations of architectural designers and environmentally sustainable construction design," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 61-75, January.
    10. Xiaoqiao Geng & Yuanqiao Wen & Chunhui Zhou & Changshi Xiao, 2017. "Establishment of the Sustainable Ecosystem for the Regional Shipping Industry Based on System Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Chan, Edwin H.W. & Qian, Queena K. & Lam, Patrick T.I., 2009. "The market for green building in developed Asian cities--the perspectives of building designers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 3061-3070, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quangdung Tran & Sajjad Nazir & Tu-Hieu Nguyen & Ngoc-Khoa Ho & Tuan-Hai Dinh & Viet-Phuong Nguyen & Manh-Hung Nguyen & Quoc-Khanh Phan & The-Son Kieu, 2020. "Empirical Examination of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Green Building Technologies: The Perspective of Construction Developers in Developing Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-28, September.
    2. Lin Zhang & Liwen Chen & Zezhou Wu & Sizhen Zhang & Huanbin Song, 2018. "Investigating Young Consumers’ Purchasing Intention of Green Housing in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Ke Fan & Edwin H. W. Chan & C. K. Chau, 2018. "Costs and Benefits of Implementing Green Building Economic Incentives: Case Study of a Gross Floor Area Concession Scheme in Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Tianqi Liu & Lin Chen & Mingyu Yang & Malindu Sandanayake & Pengyun Miao & Yang Shi & Pow-Seng Yap, 2022. "Sustainability Considerations of Green Buildings: A Detailed Overview on Current Advancements and Future Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, November.
    5. Ke Guo & Yongbo Yuan, 2021. "Geographic Distribution and Influencing Factor Analysis of Green Residential Buildings in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Wenxin Shen & Wenzhe Tang & Atthaset Siripanan & Zhen Lei & Colin F. Duffield & Felix Kin Peng Hui, 2018. "Understanding the Green Technical Capabilities and Barriers to Green Buildings in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Lin Zhang & Liwen Chen & Zezhou Wu & Hong Xue & Wenlin Dong, 2018. "Key Factors Affecting Informed Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Green Housing: A Case Study of Jinan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Wei Wang & Shoujian Zhang & Yikun Su & Xinyang Deng, 2018. "Key Factors to Green Building Technologies Adoption in Developing Countries: The Perspective of Chinese Designers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Yinan Li & Neng Zhu & Beibei Qin, 2019. "Major Barriers to the New Residential Building Energy-Efficiency Promotion in China: Frontlines’ Perceptions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, March.
    10. Isabelle Wrase, 2023. "An Analysis of Sustainability in Real Estate in Job Advertisements and Personal Profiles in Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Li Zhang & Yue Fan & Xiaochun Yang & Jiahao Zhang, 2021. "Promoting Green Real Estate Development by Increasing Residents’ Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Lavinia Denisia Cuc & Dana Rad & Daniel Manațe & Silviu Gabriel Szentesi & Anca Dicu & Mioara Florina Pantea & Vanina Adoriana Trifan & Cosmin Silviu Raul Joldeș & Graziella Corina Bâtcă-Dumitru, 2023. "Representations of the Smart Green Concept and the Intention to Implement IoT in Romanian Real Estate Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Rongrong Liu & Dong Chen & Suchang Yang & Yang Chen, 2021. "Evaluation of Green Development Efficiency of the Major Cities in Gansu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, March.
    14. Hala Sanboskani & Mounir El Asmar & Elie Azar, 2022. "Green Building Contractors 2025: Analyzing and Forecasting Green Building Contractors’ Market Trends in the US," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    15. Cezar-Petre Simion & Ciprian Nicolescu & Mihai Vrîncuț, 2019. "Green Procurement in Romanian Construction Projects. A Cluster Analysis of the Barriers and Enablers to Green Procurement in Construction Projects from the Bucharest-Ilfov Region of Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    16. Li, Qianwen & Qian, Tingyu & Wang, Jiaqi & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong & Sun, Chuanwang, 2023. "Social “win-win” promotion of green housing under the four-subject evolutionary game," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    17. Yunxia Liu & Xunpeng Shi & Ya Ping Wang & Tao Sun, 2019. "Promoting Green Residential Buildings in China: Bridging the Gap between Design and Operation to Improve Occupants’ Residential Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, June.
    18. Danlei Zhang & Yong He, 2022. "The Roles and Synergies of Actors in the Green Building Transition: Lessons from Singapore," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-19, October.
    19. David T. Tan & Yi Gong & José Gabriel Siri, 2017. "The Impact of Subsidies on the Prevalence of Climate-Sensitive Residential Buildings in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-26, December.
    20. Ying Zhang & Jian Kang & Hong Jin, 2021. "Identification of Independent Variables to Assess Green-Building Development in China Based on Grounded Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-12, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:969-:d:100667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.