IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3326-d769604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Economic Sustainability in the Transport Sector on GDP of Neighbouring Countries: Following the Example of the Baltic States

Author

Listed:
  • Galina Ševčenko-Kozlovska

    (General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, LT-10322 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Kristina Čižiūnienė

    (General Jonas Žemaitis Military Academy of Lithuania, LT-10322 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Transport is very important for the economy and the society because good transport infrastructure helps to improve the mobility of citizens and the traffic of goods, thus ensuring economic sustainability. Background: The European Union (hereinafter—EU) plans to maintain support for the development of transport infrastructure in individual member states. Lithuania’s role as a transit country in the EU’s transport network is of great importance; therefore, efficient transport services and appropriate infrastructure can not only support the domestic market and economic and social growth of the country, but also promote positive economic, social, and political processes in other countries and ensure EU’s strategic defence movement channels. Methods: The study was conducted using econometric methods, including correlation analysis and a regression model, to assess the selected parameters of the transport sector of Lithuania as a transit country and their impact on the real gross domestic product (hereinafter—RGDP) of the selected Baltic states (Latvia and Estonia). Results: The study identified a combination of key factors in the Lithuanian transport sector that affect differences in the level of real GDP per capita. Conclusions: The findings revealed differences in the context of relation between RGDP per capita in the three Baltic states and indicators of the Lithuanian transport sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Galina Ševčenko-Kozlovska & Kristina Čižiūnienė, 2022. "The Impact of Economic Sustainability in the Transport Sector on GDP of Neighbouring Countries: Following the Example of the Baltic States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3326-:d:769604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3326/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3326/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tapio, Petri, 2005. "Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 137-151, March.
    2. Maparu, Tuhin Subhra & Mazumder, Tarak Nath, 2017. "Transport infrastructure, economic development and urbanization in India (1990–2011): Is there any causal relationship?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 319-336.
    3. Robert J. Gordon & Arthur M. Okun & Herbert Stein, 1980. "Postwar Macroeconomics: The Evolution of Events and Ideas," NBER Chapters, in: The American Economy in Transition, pages 101-182, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Bennathan, Esra & Fraser, Julie & Thompson, Louis S., 1992. "What determines demand for freight transport?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 998, The World Bank.
    5. Kveiborg, Ole & Fosgerau, Mogens, 2007. "Decomposing the decoupling of Danish road freight traffic growth and economic growth," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 39-48, January.
    6. Lee, Min-Kyu & Yoo, Seung-Hoon, 2016. "The role of transportation sectors in the Korean national economy: An input-output analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 13-22.
    7. Kajal Lahiri & Wenxiong Yao, 2012. "Should transportation output be included as part of the coincident indicators system?," OECD Journal: Journal of Business Cycle Measurement and Analysis, OECD Publishing, Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys, vol. 2012(1), pages 1-24.
    8. Philip Lawn, 2005. "An Assessment of the Valuation Methods Used to Calculate the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), and Sustainable Net Benefit Index (SNBI)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 185-208, June.
    9. Zvi Griliches, 1992. "Output Measurement in the Service Sectors," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number gril92-1, June.
    10. Albert Wijeweera & Hong To & Michael Charles, 2014. "An empirical analysis of Australian freight rail demand," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 21-29.
    11. Lakshmanan, T.R., 2011. "The broader economic consequences of transport infrastructure investments," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12.
    12. Paolo Agnolucci & David Bonilla, 2009. "UK Freight Demand: Elasticities and Decoupling," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 43(3), pages 317-344, September.
    13. Gitana Dudzevičiūtė & Svajone Bekesiene & Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Galina Ševčenko-Kozlovska, 2021. "An Assessment of the Relationship between Defence Expenditure and Sustainable Development in the Baltic Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-27, June.
    14. Chi, Junwook, 2016. "Exchange rate and transport cost sensitivities of bilateral freight flows between the US and China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 1-13.
    15. Tong, Tingting & Yu, T. Edward, 2018. "Transportation and economic growth in China: A heterogeneous panel cointegration and causality analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 120-130.
    16. Alises, Ana & Vassallo, José Manuel, 2015. "Comparison of road freight transport trends in Europe. Coupling and decoupling factors from an Input–Output structural decomposition analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 141-157.
    17. Changxiang Lu & Shaochuan Fu & Jiaqi Fang & Jikai Huang & Yong Ye & Arunava Majumder, 2021. "Analysis of Factors Affecting Freight Demand Based on Input-Output Model," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-19, March.
    18. Robert J. Gordon, 1992. "Productivity in the Transportation Sector," NBER Chapters, in: Output Measurement in the Service Sectors, pages 371-427, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Jozef Gnap & Šimon Senko & Mariusz Kostrzewski & Mária Brídziková & Renáta Cződörová & Zdeněk Říha, 2021. "Research on the Relationship between Transport Infrastructure and Performance in Rail and Road Freight Transport—A Case Study of Japan and Selected European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    20. Fredrik N. G. Andersson & Thomas Elger, 2012. "Swedish Freight Demand: Short, Medium, and Long-term Elasticities," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 46(1), pages 79-97, January.
    21. Garrido, Rodrigo A. & Mahmassani, Hani S., 2000. "Forecasting freight transportation demand with the space-time multinomial probit model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 403-418, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Shafique & Anam Azam & Muhammad Rafiq & Xiaowei Luo, 2020. "Evaluating the Relationship between Freight Transport, Economic Prosperity, Urbanization, and CO 2 Emissions: Evidence from Hong Kong, Singapore, and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Saidi, Samir & Mani, Venkatesh & Mefteh, Haifa & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Akhtar, Pervaiz, 2020. "Dynamic linkages between transport, logistics, foreign direct Investment, and economic growth: Empirical evidence from developing countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 277-293.
    3. Shafique, Muhammad & Azam, Anam & Rafiq, Muhammad & Luo, Xiaowei, 2021. "Investigating the nexus among transport, economic growth and environmental degradation: Evidence from panel ARDL approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 61-71.
    4. Zhilun Jiao & Muhammad Shafiullah & Usman Khalid & Malin Song & Muhammad Shahbaz, 2024. "The economic growth–travel frequency nexus in China: Importance of the transport Kuznets curve," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 898-929, March.
    5. Luka Vukić & Davor Mikulić & Damira Keček, 2021. "The Impact of Transportation on the Croatian Economy: The Input–Output Approach," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Goulden, Murray & Ryley, Tim & Dingwall, Robert, 2014. "Beyond ‘predict and provide’: UK transport, the growth paradigm and climate change," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 139-147.
    7. Goyal, Srishti & Llop, Maria, 2024. "The shipping industry under the EU Green Deal: An Input-Output impact analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    8. Wu, Bingyu & Levinson, David M., 2024. "A multi-modal analysis of the effect of transport on population and productivity in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    9. Liimatainen, Heikki & Pöllänen, Markus, 2013. "The impact of sectoral economic development on the energy efficiency and CO2 emissions of road freight transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 150-157.
    10. Samir, Saidi & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Akhtar, Pervaiz, 2018. "The Long-Run Relationship between Transport Energy Consumption and Transport Infrastructure on Economic Growth in MENA Countries," MPRA Paper 85037, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 06 Mar 2018.
    11. Zhao, Bing & Wang, Nuo & Wang, Yixuan, 2022. "The role of different transportation modes in China's national economy: An input–output analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 92-102.
    12. Kajal Lahiri & Wenxiong Yao, 2004. "A dynamic factor model of the coincident indicators for the US transportation sector," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(10), pages 595-600.
    13. Juan Gomez & José Manuel Vassallo, 2020. "Has heavy vehicle tolling in Europe been effective in reducing road freight transport and promoting modal shift?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 865-892, April.
    14. Song, Yan & Zhang, Ming & Shan, Cheng, 2019. "Research on the decoupling trend and mitigation potential of CO2 emissions from China's transport sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 837-843.
    15. Carlos Scheel & Eduardo Aguiñaga & Bernardo Bello, 2020. "Decoupling Economic Development from the Consumption of Finite Resources Using Circular Economy. A Model for Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    16. Roger W. Ferguson & William L. Wascher, 2004. "Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government: Lessons from Past Productivity Booms," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 18(2), pages 3-28, Spring.
    17. Eom, Jiyong & Schipper, Lee & Thompson, Lou, 2012. "We keep on truckin': Trends in freight energy use and carbon emissions in 11 IEA countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 327-341.
    18. Batool, Irem & Goldmann, Kathrin, 2021. "The role of public and private transport infrastructure capital in economic growth. Evidence from Pakistan," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Kajal Lahiri, Wenxiong Yao, and Peg Young, 2003. "Cycles in the Transportation Sector and the Aggregate Economy," Discussion Papers 03-14, University at Albany, SUNY, Department of Economics.
    20. Yetkiner, Hakan & Beyzatlar, Mehmet Aldonat, 2020. "The Granger-causality between wealth and transportation: A panel data approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 19-25.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3326-:d:769604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.