IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3311-d769292.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Workplace 4.0: Exploring the Implications of Technology Adoption in Digital Manufacturing on a Sustainable Workforce

Author

Listed:
  • Natalie Leesakul

    (School of Computer Science, Jubilee Campus, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK)

  • Anne-Marie Oostveen

    (Industrial Psychology and Human Factors Group, SATM, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Iveta Eimontaite

    (Industrial Psychology and Human Factors Group, SATM, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK)

  • Max L. Wilson

    (School of Computer Science, Jubilee Campus, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UK)

  • Richard Hyde

    (School of Law, University Park Campus, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK)

Abstract

As part of the Industry 4.0 movement, the introduction of digital manufacturing technologies (DMTs) poses various concerns, particularly the impact of technology adoption on the workforce. In consideration of adoption challenges and implications, various studies explore the topic from the perspective of safety, socio-economic impact, technical readiness, and risk assessment. This paper presents mixed methods research to explore the challenges and acceptance factors of the adoption of human-robot collaboration (HRC) applications and other digital manufacturing technologies from the perspective of different stakeholders: from manufacturing employees at all levels to legal experts to consultants to ethicists. We found that some of the prominent challenges and tensions inherent in technology adoption are job displacement, employee’s acceptance, trust, and privacy. This paper argues that it is crucial to understand the wider human factors implications to better strategize technology adoption; therefore, it recommends interventions targeted at individual employees and at the organisational level. This paper contributes to the roadmap of responsible DMT and HRC implementation to encourage a sustainable workforce in digital manufacturing.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalie Leesakul & Anne-Marie Oostveen & Iveta Eimontaite & Max L. Wilson & Richard Hyde, 2022. "Workplace 4.0: Exploring the Implications of Technology Adoption in Digital Manufacturing on a Sustainable Workforce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3311-:d:769292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3311/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3311/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glock, C. H. & Grosse, E. H. & Jaber, M. Y. & Smunt, T. L., 2019. "Applications of learning curves in production and operations management: A systematic literature review," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 115512, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Georg Graetz & Guy Michaels, 2018. "Robots at Work," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 100(5), pages 753-768, December.
    3. Andrew Prahl & Lyn Van Swol, 2017. "Understanding algorithm aversion: When is advice from automation discounted?," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(6), pages 691-702, September.
    4. Yuri Lima & Carlos Eduardo Barbosa & Herbert Salazar dos Santos & Jano Moreira de Souza, 2021. "Understanding Technological Unemployment: A Review of Causes, Consequences, and Solutions," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Nuno Boavida & Marta Candeias, 2021. "Recent Automation Trends in Portugal: Implications on Industrial Productivity and Employment in Automotive Sector," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Frey, Carl Benedikt & Osborne, Michael A., 2017. "The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 254-280.
    7. Gertler, Meric S., 2004. "Manufacturing Culture: The Institutional Geography of Industrial Practice," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198233824.
    8. Arntz, Melanie & Gregory, Terry & Zierahn, Ulrich, 2017. "Revisiting the risk of automation," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 157-160.
    9. Glock, C. H. & Grosse, E. H. & Jaber, M. Y. & Smunt, T. L., 2019. "Applications of learning curves in production and operations management: A systematic literature review," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 115511, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    10. Glock, C. H. & Grosse, E. H. & Jaber, M. Y. & Smunt, T. L., 2019. "Applications of learning curves in production and operations management: A systematic literature review," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 107692, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    11. Jaime Campos, 2016. "Managing the information systems in the industrial domain," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1180967-118, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ghobakhloo, Morteza & Asadi, Shahla & Iranmanesh, Mohammad & Foroughi, Behzad & Mubarak, Muhammad Faraz & Yadegaridehkordi, Elaheh, 2023. "Intelligent automation implementation and corporate sustainability performance: The enabling role of corporate social responsibility strategy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    2. Juan F. Jimeno, 2019. "Fewer babies and more robots: economic growth in a new era of demographic and technological changes," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 10(2), pages 93-114, June.
    3. Abeliansky, Ana Lucia & Beulmann, Matthias, 2019. "Are they coming for us? Industrial robots and the mental health of workers," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 379, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    4. Dakotah Hogan & John Elshaw & Clay Koschnick & Jonathan Ritschel & Adedeji Badiru & Shawn Valentine, 2020. "Cost Estimating Using a New Learning Curve Theory for Non-Constant Production Rates," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Prettner, Klaus & Strulik, Holger, 2020. "Innovation, automation, and inequality: Policy challenges in the race against the machine," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 249-265.
    6. Seamus McGuinness & Konstantinos Pouliakas & Paul Redmond, 2023. "Skills-displacing technological change and its impact on jobs: challenging technological alarmism?," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 370-392, April.
    7. Zhihui Dai & Yue Niu & Hongru Zhang & Xiaodi Niu, 2022. "Impact of the Transforming and Upgrading of China’s Labor-Intensive Manufacturing Industry on the Labor Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Wang, Xiong & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Chang, Ching-Ter, 2022. "Multi-objective competency-based approach to project scheduling and staff assignment: Case study of an internal audit project," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    9. Genz, Sabrina & Gregory, Terry & Janser, Markus & Lehmer, Florian & Matthes, Britta, 2021. "How do workers adjust when firms adopt new technologies?," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-073, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    10. Damioli, G. & Van Roy, V. & Vertesy, D. & Vivarelli, M., 2021. "May AI revolution be labour-friendly? Some micro evidence from the supply side," GLO Discussion Paper Series 823, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    11. Manda, A.B. & Uzsoy, Reha, 2021. "Managing product transitions with learning and congestion effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    12. Consoli, Davide & Marin, Giovanni & Rentocchini, Francesco & Vona, Francesco, 2023. "Routinization, within-occupation task changes and long-run employment dynamics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    13. Gregory, Terry & Salomons, Anna & Zierahn, Ulrich, 2016. "Racing With or Against the Machine? Evidence from Europe," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145843, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    14. Liu, Hui & Su, Bingbing & Guo, Min & Wang, Jingbei, 2024. "Exploring R&D network resilience under risk propagation: An organizational learning perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    15. Jaber, M.Y. & Peltokorpi, J. & Glock, C.H. & Grosse, E.H. & Pusic, M., 2021. "Adjustment for cognitive interference enhances the predictability of the power learning curve," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    16. Sunil Mani, 2018. "Robot Apocalypse Does It Matter For India’S Manufacturing Industry?," Working Papers id:12683, eSocialSciences.
    17. Asghari, M. & Afshari, H. & Jaber, M.Y. & Searcy, C., 2024. "Learning and forgetting interactions within a collaborative human-centric manufacturing network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(3), pages 977-991.
    18. Georg Graetz, 2019. "Labor Demand in the Past, Present, and Future," European Economy - Discussion Papers 114, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    19. Nii-Aponsah, Hubert, 2022. "Automation exposure and implications in advanced and developing countries across gender, age, and skills," MERIT Working Papers 2022-021, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    20. Fossen, Frank M. & Sorgner, Alina, 2019. "New Digital Technologies and Heterogeneous Employment and Wage Dynamics in the United States: Evidence from Individual-Level Data," IZA Discussion Papers 12242, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3311-:d:769292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.