IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3288-d768927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward a Comprehensive Model of Green Marketing and Innovative Green Adoption: Application of a Stimulus-Organism-Response Model

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana Amaya Rivas

    (Department of International Business Administration Chinese Culture, ESPAE Graduate School of Management, Guayaquil 090313, Ecuador)

  • Ying-Kai Liao

    (Program of International Business, Nanhua University, Chiayi County 62249, Taiwan)

  • Minh-Quan Vu

    (Department of Business Administration, Nanhua University, Chiayi County 62249, Taiwan)

  • Chia-Sheng Hung

    (Program of International Business, Nanhua University, Chiayi County 62249, Taiwan)

Abstract

An increasing number of people and organizations have become aware of global warming and environmental deterioration and have become engaged in socially responsible activities to save the Earth. However, a comprehensive model that integrates the antecedents, mediators, and moderators of green adoption is yet to be developed. In this study, a comprehensive research model was developed that incorporates a stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) model, consumption value theory, and value–belief–norm theory. A quantitative approach was adopted to collect data from customers who had experience with green purchasing in Taiwan. The empirical findings reveal that the influence of green marketing activities on three mediators—consumers’ environmental attitude, consumption values, and personal norms—is significant. These three mediators have a significant impact on consumers’ innovative green adoption. Thus, a full meditation effect is found, suggesting that marketers should increase their focus on promoting innovative green adoption through environmental attitude, consumption values, and personal norms. The findings of this study may help academicians in conducting further theoretical validation and professionals in developing applicable marketing strategies to promote green adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana Amaya Rivas & Ying-Kai Liao & Minh-Quan Vu & Chia-Sheng Hung, 2022. "Toward a Comprehensive Model of Green Marketing and Innovative Green Adoption: Application of a Stimulus-Organism-Response Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3288-:d:768927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3288/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3288/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarstedt, Marko & Ringle, Christian M. & Smith, Donna & Reams, Russell & Hair, Joseph F., 2014. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 105-115.
    2. Ghazali, Ezlika & Soon, Pat Chen & Mutum, Dilip S. & Nguyen, Bang, 2017. "Health and cosmetics: Investigating consumers’ values for buying organic personal care products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 154-163.
    3. Lin, Jialing & Lobo, Antonio & Leckie, Civilai, 2017. "The role of benefits and transparency in shaping consumers’ green perceived value, self-brand connection and brand loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 133-141.
    4. Birgitta Gatersleben & Niamh Murtagh & Wokje Abrahamse, 2014. "Values, identity and pro-environmental behaviour," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 374-392, December.
    5. Polonsky, Michael Jay, 2011. "Transformative green marketing: Impediments and opportunities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 1311-1319.
    6. Sheth, Jagdish N. & Newman, Bruce I. & Gross, Barbara L., 1991. "Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 159-170, March.
    7. Mei-Teh Goi & Vigneswari Kalidas & Norzita Yunus, 2018. "Mediating roles of emotion and experience in the stimulus-organism-response framework in higher education institutions," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 90-112, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morais, Ana Catarina & Ishida, Akira & Matsuda, Ruriko, 2024. "Ethical food consumption drivers in Japan. A S–O-R framework application using PLS-SEM with a MGA assessment based on clustering," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep & Bodhi, Rahul & Singh, Tripti & Almotairi, Mohammad, 2020. "Why do people use and recommend m-wallets?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    2. Waris, Idrees & Hameed, Irfan, 2019. "Using Extended Model of Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Purchase Intention of Energy Efficient Home Appliances in Pakistan," MPRA Paper 109612, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Lim, Xin-Jean & Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Ngo, Liem Viet & Chan, Kara & Ting, Hiram, 2023. "How do crazy rich Asians perceive sustainable luxury? Investigating the determinants of consumers’ willingness to pay a premium price," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Cindy Grappe & Cindy Lombart & Didier Louis & Fabien Durif, 2022. "Clean labeling: Is it about the presence of benefits or the absence of detriments? Consumer response to personal care claims," Post-Print hal-04293232, HAL.
    5. Deepti Jog & Divya Singhal, 2024. "Greenwashing Understanding Among Indian Consumers and Its Impact on Their Green Consumption," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2), pages 491-511, April.
    6. Eunyoung Choi & Kun Chang Lee, 2019. "Effect of Trust in Domain-Specific Information of Safety, Brand Loyalty, and Perceived Value for Cosmetics on Purchase Intentions in Mobile E-Commerce Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    7. Fazli-Salehi, Reza & Torres, Ivonne M. & Madadi, Rozbeh & Zúñiga, Miguel Ángel, 2021. "Multicultural advertising: The impact of consumers’ self-concept clarity and materialism on self-brand connection and communal-brand connection," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 46-57.
    8. Yuanhong Liao & Weihong Yang, 2022. "The determinants of different types of private-sphere pro-environmental behaviour: an integrating framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8566-8592, June.
    9. Saif, Mashaal A.M. & Hussin, Nazimah & Husin, Maizaitulaidawati Md & Muneer, Amgad & Alwadain, Ayed, 2024. "Beyond conventions: Unravelling perceived value's role in shaping digital-only banks' adoption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    10. Iyer, Pramod & Davari, Arezoo & Mukherjee, Amaradri, 2018. "Investigating the effectiveness of retailers’ mobile applications in determining customer satisfaction and repatronage intentions? A congruency perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 235-243.
    11. Haroon Qasim & Liang Yan & Rui Guo & Amer Saeed & Badar Nadeem Ashraf, 2019. "The Defining Role of Environmental Self-Identity among Consumption Values and Behavioral Intention to Consume Organic Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Muhammad Ashraf & Jamil Ahmad & Mumtaz Abdul Rehman & Wareesa Sharif, 2022. "Impact Of User And Solomo Characteristics On Solomo Reuse Intention: Theory Of Consumption Value," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 11(1), pages 63-72, March.
    13. Goh, Choon Fu & Long, Chiau Ming & Humaira Fedelis, Nur Aisyah & Hamdan, Halimaton & Chuah, Soo Cheng & Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Cheng Ling & Wong, Tin Wui, 2023. "Critical insights of nano-based pharmaceutical, cosmeceutical and nutraceutical products: Empirical evidence from the consumption values perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Ghazali, Ezlika & Soon, Pat Chen & Mutum, Dilip S. & Nguyen, Bang, 2017. "Health and cosmetics: Investigating consumers’ values for buying organic personal care products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 154-163.
    15. Grappe, Cindy G. & Lombart, Cindy & Louis, Didier & Durif, Fabien, 2022. "Clean labeling: Is it about the presence of benefits or the absence of detriments? Consumer response to personal care claims," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. Sadiq, Mohd & Adil, Mohd & Paul, Justin, 2021. "An innovation resistance theory perspective on purchase of eco-friendly cosmetics," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    17. Kavita Kamboj & Nawal Kishor, 2024. "Assessing the Effects of Customer-perceived Values Toward Organic Food: The Moderating Role of Media Exposure to Food Safety Issues," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 12(3), pages 444-461, July.
    18. Nour El Houda Ben Amor & Mohamed Nabil Mzoughi, 2023. "Do Millennials’ Motives for Using Snapchat Influence the Effectiveness of Snap Ads?," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    19. Saarijärvi, Hannu & Mitronen, Lasse & Yrjölä, Mika, 2014. "From selling to supporting – Leveraging mobile services in the context of food retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 26-36.
    20. Ioana Gutu & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Alexandru Tugui, 2023. "Assessment of a Workforce Sustainability Tool through Leadership and Digitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-30, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3288-:d:768927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.