IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2744-d759141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of the Right Moment for Motor Vehicle Replacement—Life-Cycle Analysis in Serbia and Montenegro

Author

Listed:
  • Vujadin Vesovic

    (Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, Adriatik University Bar, 85310 Budva, Montenegro)

  • Dragutin Jovanovic

    (Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, University Business Academy, 12000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Milos Arsic

    (Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, University Business Academy, 12000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Zoran Avramovic

    (Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, Adriatik University Bar, 85310 Budva, Montenegro)

  • Svetozar Sofijanic

    (Belgrade Polytechnic College, Academy of Applied Technical Studies Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Boban Djorovic

    (Military Academy, University of Defence in Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Natasa Gospic

    (Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, Adriatik University Bar, 85310 Budva, Montenegro)

  • Nena Tomovic

    (Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, University Business Academy, 12000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Dragan Milosevic

    (Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, University Business Academy, 12000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Mladen Dobric

    (Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, University Business Academy, 12000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Sinisa Arsic

    (Telekom Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Dragan Kostadinovic

    (Military Academy, University of Defence in Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Safet Kalac

    (Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, Adriatik University Bar, 85310 Budva, Montenegro)

  • Velibor Peulic

    (Faculty of Business Economics, PanEuropean University ”Apeiron”, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Tibor Fazekas

    (City Hall Administration, 24000 Subotica, Serbia)

  • Dragana Rosulj

    (Belgrade Polytechnic College, Academy of Applied Technical Studies Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Dijana Medenica Mitrovic

    (Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, Adriatik University Bar, 85310 Budva, Montenegro)

  • Jasmin Hodzic

    (Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, Adriatik University Bar, 85310 Budva, Montenegro)

  • Marijana Prelevic

    (Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, Adriatik University Bar, 85310 Budva, Montenegro)

  • Milan Andric

    (Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Serbia, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

This paper deals with the issue of planning the end-of-life phase of motor vehicle life cycles in Serbia and Montenegro. This topic is trending around sustainability issues, given the very unfavorable age structure of vehicles and the increasing import of used cars, which intensifies the problem of the number of waste vehicles. On average, a motor vehicle is in active use for a period of 10 to 15 years. Individual phases of its life cycle are indicated differently, using multiple parameters. All phases are influenced by many factors, but this paper focuses on the phases of active use and the end of life of a motor vehicle. This paper investigates these two phases in terms of the influencing elements. The main aim of this study is to lay the foundations for making adequate decisions on how to handle end-of-life vehicles, from the perspective of their drivers. The study includes performing quantitative research analysis via the k-means clustering technique on a sample of 1240 drivers (private and commercial vehicles), in order to draw concrete conclusions through appropriate statistical analysis. The key findings suggest that different market, business, and environment indicators define the phases of active use and end of life, throughout the life cycle of a motor vehicle. Future research will expand the sample to surrounding countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Vujadin Vesovic & Dragutin Jovanovic & Milos Arsic & Zoran Avramovic & Svetozar Sofijanic & Boban Djorovic & Natasa Gospic & Nena Tomovic & Dragan Milosevic & Mladen Dobric & Sinisa Arsic & Dragan Kos, 2022. "Identification of the Right Moment for Motor Vehicle Replacement—Life-Cycle Analysis in Serbia and Montenegro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2744-:d:759141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2744/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2744/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giuseppe Volpato & Andrea Stocchetti, 2008. "Managing product life cycle in the auto industry: evaluating carmakers effectiveness," International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 22-41.
    2. Dominik Jasiński & James Meredith & Kerry Kirwan, 2021. "Sustainable development model for measuring and managing sustainability in the automotive sector," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1123-1137, November.
    3. Ksenija Denčić-Mihajlov & Mladen Krstić & Dejan Spasić, 2020. "Sensitivity Analysis as a Tool in Environmental Policy for Sustainability: The Case of Waste Recycling Projects in the Republic of Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Svetozar Slobodan Sofijanic & Sinisa Milos Arsic & Dragutin Jovanovic & Milos Zivko Arsic & Safet Kalac & Zoran Ribaric & Dragan Kostadinovic & Velibor Peulic & Dragana Rosulj & Tibor Fazekas & Srdjan, 2021. "Influence of Business-Operational Performances and Company Size on CO 2 Emissions Decrease-Case of Serbian Road Transport Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Troy R. Hawkins & Bhawna Singh & Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez & Anders Hammer Strømman, 2013. "Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 17(1), pages 53-64, February.
    6. Ana M. Aizcorbe & James T. Hickman & Martha Starr-McCluer, 2003. "The replacement demand for motor vehicles: evidence from the Survey of Consumer Finances," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2003-44, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    7. Kamilė Petrauskienė & Arvydas Galinis & Daina Kliaugaitė & Jolanta Dvarionienė, 2021. "Comparative Environmental Life Cycle and Cost Assessment of Electric, Hybrid, and Conventional Vehicles in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Lei Yang & Caixia Hao & Yina Chai, 2018. "Life Cycle Assessment of Commercial Delivery Trucks: Diesel, Plug-In Electric, and Battery-Swap Electric," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Jean-Jacques Chanaron, 2007. "Life Cycle Assessment Practices: Benchmarking Selected European Automobile Manufacturers," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-00205034, HAL.
    10. Jean-Jacques Chanaron, 2007. "Life Cycle Assessment Practices: Benchmarking Selected European Automobile Manufacturers," Post-Print halshs-00205034, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nenming Wang & Guwen Tang, 2022. "A Review on Environmental Efficiency Evaluation of New Energy Vehicles Using Life Cycle Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-35, March.
    2. Maxwell Woody & Michael T. Craig & Parth T. Vaishnav & Geoffrey M. Lewis & Gregory A. Keoleian, 2022. "Optimizing future cost and emissions of electric delivery vehicles," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 1108-1122, June.
    3. Annekatrin Lehmann & Markus Berger & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2018. "Life Cycle Based CO2 Emission Credits: Options for Improving the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Current Tailpipe Emissions Regulation in the Automotive Industry," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1066-1079, October.
    4. Nelson, Ewan & Warren, Peter, 2020. "UK transport decoupling: On track for clean growth in transport?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 39-51.
    5. Ghotge, Rishabh & van Wijk, Ad & Lukszo, Zofia, 2021. "Off-grid solar charging of electric vehicles at long-term parking locations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Marit Mohr & Jens F. Peters & Manuel Baumann & Marcel Weil, 2020. "Toward a cell‐chemistry specific life cycle assessment of lithium‐ion battery recycling processes," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1310-1322, December.
    7. Idiano D'Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Ilhan Ozturk, 2023. "The sustainable development of mobility in the green transition: Renewable energy, local industrial chain, and battery recycling," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 840-852, April.
    8. Christian Wankmüller & Maximilian Kunovjanek & Robert Gennaro Sposato & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Selecting E-Mobility Transport Solutions for Mountain Rescue Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-19, December.
    9. Shi, Xiao & Pan, Jian & Wang, Hewu & Cai, Hua, 2019. "Battery electric vehicles: What is the minimum range required?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 352-358.
    10. Rajan Varadarajan, 2017. "Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 14-36, January.
    11. Anders Skonhoft & Bjart Holtsmark, 2014. "The Norwegian support and subsidy of electric cars. Should it be adopted by other countries?," Working Paper Series 15814, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    12. Huang, Hai-chao & He, Hong-di & Peng, Zhong-ren, 2024. "Urban-scale estimation model of carbon emissions for ride-hailing electric vehicles during operational phase," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    13. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat & Tatari, Omer, 2015. "Conventional, hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric vehicles? State-based comparative carbon and energy footprint analysis in the United States," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 36-49.
    14. Joan Hereu-Morales & César Valderrama, 2022. "Towards a Sustainability-Based Society: An Analysis of Fundamental Values from the Perspective of Economics and Philosophy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Marmiroli, Benedetta & Venditti, Mattia & Dotelli, Giovanni & Spessa, Ezio, 2020. "The transport of goods in the urban environment: A comparative life cycle assessment of electric, compressed natural gas and diesel light-duty vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    16. Lefeng, Shi & Shengnan, Lv & Chunxiu, Liu & Yue, Zhou & Cipcigan, Liana & Acker, Thomas L., 2020. "A framework for electric vehicle power supply chain development," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    17. Idiano D’Adamo & Massimo Gastaldi & Jacopo Piccioni & Paolo Rosa, 2023. "The Role of Automotive Flexibility in Supporting the Diffusion of Sustainable Mobility Initiatives: A Stakeholder Attitudes Assessment," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(3), pages 459-481, September.
    18. Perrine, Kenneth A. & Kockelman, Kara M. & Huang, Yantao, 2020. "Anticipating long-distance travel shifts due to self-driving vehicles," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Lipson, Matthew M. & Chard, Rose, 2019. "Temporality, vulnerability, and energy justice in household low carbon innovations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 495-504.
    20. Johannes Morfeldt & Daniel J. A. Johansson, 2022. "Impacts of shared mobility on vehicle lifetimes and on the carbon footprint of electric vehicles," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2744-:d:759141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.