IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v22y2018i5p1066-1079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Based CO2 Emission Credits: Options for Improving the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Current Tailpipe Emissions Regulation in the Automotive Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Annekatrin Lehmann
  • Markus Berger
  • Matthias Finkbeiner

Abstract

The current focus on the use phase in automotive carbon dioxide (CO2) legislation bares a risk of unintended consequences as often reductions in the use phase come along with increasing CO2 emissions in other life cycle (LC) phases. This study presents voluntary policy options in form of LC‐based CO2 emission credits. They were developed by desk research considering existing applications of LCA in practice (e.g., environmental reports) and feedback obtained in a structured stakeholder dialogue. A variety of credit options were identified, including rather simple ones based on life cycle thinking (LCT) and more advanced options which rely on quantitative LCA: LCT options that reward innovations leading to CO2 reductions, for example, in the production phase. LCA‐based options reward CO2 reductions along the LC (credits for an International Organization for Standardization [ISO] 14044 conforming externally reviewed LCA showing a continuous improvement) or reductions of other environmental impacts. It was shown that the credit options can be implemented throughout a simplified and robust methodology, for example, with defined rules for conducting the LCA based on international standards and established industry practice, and for calculating the credits (e.g., a credit of 1 gram [g] of CO2/km [kilometer] for savings of 10 g of CO2/km). Voluntary credit options as a complementary modality to the current automotive tailpipe‐based CO2 regulations would help to improve its efficiency and effectiveness and support and reward efforts on achieving real net CO2 emission reductions. The credit options were developed with a first focus on CO2 and automotive industry, but can generally be transferred to other environmental impacts and sectors as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Annekatrin Lehmann & Markus Berger & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2018. "Life Cycle Based CO2 Emission Credits: Options for Improving the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Current Tailpipe Emissions Regulation in the Automotive Industry," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(5), pages 1066-1079, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:22:y:2018:i:5:p:1066-1079
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12657
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.12657?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Jacques Chanaron, 2007. "Life Cycle Assessment Practices: Benchmarking Selected European Automobile Manufacturers," Post-Print halshs-00205034, HAL.
    2. Jean-Jacques Chanaron, 2007. "Life Cycle Assessment Practices: Benchmarking Selected European Automobile Manufacturers," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-00205034, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vujadin Vesovic & Dragutin Jovanovic & Milos Arsic & Zoran Avramovic & Svetozar Sofijanic & Boban Djorovic & Natasa Gospic & Nena Tomovic & Dragan Milosevic & Mladen Dobric & Sinisa Arsic & Dragan Kos, 2022. "Identification of the Right Moment for Motor Vehicle Replacement—Life-Cycle Analysis in Serbia and Montenegro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:22:y:2018:i:5:p:1066-1079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.