IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2595-d756849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Living Labs in Social Housing Upgrades: Process, Challenges and Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Marcelle Engler Bridi

    (Department of Architecture and Construction, University of Campinas, Av. Albert Einstein 951, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas 13083-852, Brazil)

  • Joao Soliman-Junior

    (Department of Architecture and 3D Design, School of Arts and Humanities, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK)

  • Ariovaldo Denis Granja

    (Department of Architecture and Construction, University of Campinas, Av. Albert Einstein 951, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas 13083-852, Brazil)

  • Patricia Tzortzopoulos

    (Department of Architecture and 3D Design, School of Arts and Humanities, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK)

  • Vanessa Gomes

    (Department of Architecture and Construction, University of Campinas, Av. Albert Einstein 951, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas 13083-852, Brazil)

  • Doris Catharine Cornelie Knatz Kowaltowski

    (Department of Architecture and Construction, University of Campinas, Av. Albert Einstein 951, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz, Campinas 13083-852, Brazil)

Abstract

Social housing (SH) upgrades involve multiple stakeholders with sometimes divergent requirements and needs. Collaboration and participative processes are essential to ensuring an appropriate value for users is delivered through social housing upgrades. Living Labs are user-centred initiatives where researchers, public and private partners, and users collaborate to develop innovative solutions in real-live environments. However, scarce research exists on how Living Labs may support the upgrading of social housing, and there is a need to explore what the challenges are that can be expected in this context. This paper discusses an integrative literature synthesis of housing upgrades developed within the context of Living Labs. Nine information-rich cases identified in the literature were chosen for in-depth examination. A living lab process was proposed based on the literature and activities and tools used in Living Labs were identified. From the challenges highlighted by existing studies, a series of recommendations to support the development of Living Labs in social housing upgrades was proposed. These should support Living Labs implementation initiatives in this specific context.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcelle Engler Bridi & Joao Soliman-Junior & Ariovaldo Denis Granja & Patricia Tzortzopoulos & Vanessa Gomes & Doris Catharine Cornelie Knatz Kowaltowski, 2022. "Living Labs in Social Housing Upgrades: Process, Challenges and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2595-:d:756849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2595/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2595/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marina Van Geenhuizen, 2019. "Applying an RRI Filter in Key Learning on Urban Living Labs’ Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Fabio Fantozzi & Caterina Gargari & Massimo Rovai & Giacomo Salvadori, 2019. "Energy Upgrading of Residential Building Stock: Use of Life Cycle Cost Analysis to Assess Interventions on Social Housing in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Sofia Pemsel & Kristian Widen, 2011. "Bridging boundaries between organizations in construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 495-506.
    4. Snyder, Hannah, 2019. "Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 333-339.
    5. Darinka Czischke, 2018. "Collaborative housing and housing providers: towards an analytical framework of multi-stakeholder collaboration in housing co-production," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 55-81, January.
    6. Pilar Mercader-Moyano & Paula M. Esquivias & Radu Muntean, 2020. "Eco-Efficient Analysis of a Refurbishment Proposal for a Social Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-31, August.
    7. Federica Rosso & Arianna Peduzzi & Lorenzo Diana & Stefano Cascone & Carlo Cecere, 2021. "A Sustainable Approach towards the Retrofit of the Public Housing Building Stock: Energy-Architectural Experimental and Numerical Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Hannes Thees & Harald Pechlaner & Natalie Olbrich & Arne Schuhbert, 2020. "The Living Lab as a Tool to Promote Residents’ Participation in Destination Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, February.
    9. Mónica E. Edwards-Schachter & Cristian E. Matti & Enrique Alcántara, 2012. "Fostering Quality of Life through Social Innovation: A Living Lab Methodology Study Case," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 29(6), pages 672-692, November.
    10. Leo Oorschot & Lidwine Spoormans & Sabira El Messlaki & Thaleia Konstantinou & Tim De Jonge & Clarine Van Oel & Thijs Asselbergs & Vincent Gruis & Wessel De Jonge, 2018. "Flagships of the Dutch Welfare State in Transformation: A Transformation Framework for Balancing Sustainability and Cultural Values in Energy-Efficient Renovation of Postwar Walk-Up Apartment Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-22, July.
    11. Sadowski, Bert M., 2017. "Advanced users and the adoption of high speed broadband: Results of a living lab study in the Netherlands," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1-14.
    12. Darren Sharp & Robert Salter, 2017. "Direct Impacts of an Urban Living Lab from the Participants’ Perspective: Livewell Yarra," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Darinka Czischke, 2018. "Collaborative housing and housing providers: towards an analytical framework of multi-stakeholder collaboration in housing co-production," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 55-81, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karen Soledad Villanueva-Paredes & Grace Ximena Villanueva-Paredes, 2023. "Policies and Mechanisms of Public Financing for Social Housing in Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hannes Thees & Harald Pechlaner & Natalie Olbrich & Arne Schuhbert, 2020. "The Living Lab as a Tool to Promote Residents’ Participation in Destination Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, February.
    2. Aimee Felstead & Kevin Thwaites & James Simpson, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework for Urban Commoning in Shared Residential Landscapes in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Noémie Dominguez & Patricia Loncle & Emanuelle Maunaye & Eunice Cascant & Catherine Mercier-Suissa & Emily Mugel & Maité Pinchon & Nancy Ottaviano, 2021. "Overview of Refugees’ access to housing in France: the metropoles of Lyon and Rennes," Working Papers halshs-03448067, HAL.
    4. Fedoua Kasmi & Ferney Osorio & Laurent Dupont & Brunelle Marche & Mauricio Camargo, 2022. "Innovation Spaces as Drivers of Eco-innovations Supporting the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Post-Print hal-03590438, HAL.
    5. Bryan Dorsey, 2021. "Refocusing on Sustainability: Promoting Straw Bale Building for Government-Assisted, Self-Help Housing Programs in Utah and Abroad," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Lars Fuglsang & Anne Vorre Hansen & Ines Mergel & Maria Taivalsaari Røhnebæk, 2021. "Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Lucy Oates & Abhijit Datey & Andrew Sudmant & Ross Gillard & Andy Gouldson, 2024. "Community Participation in Urban Land and Housing Delivery: Evidence from Kerala (India) and Dar es Salaam (Tanzania)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Darinka Czischke & Carla J. Huisman, 2018. "Integration through Collaborative Housing? Dutch Starters and Refugees Forming Self-Managing Communities in Amsterdam," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(4), pages 156-165.
    9. Trond-Arne Borgersen, 2022. "A Housing Market with Cournot Competition and a Third Housing Sector," International Journal of Economic Sciences, European Research Center, vol. 11(2), pages 13-27, November.
    10. Jutta Deffner & Jan-Marc Joost & Manuela Weber & Immanuel Stiess, 2021. "Bottom-Up Strategies for Shared Mobility and Practices in Urban Housing to Improve Sustainable Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Dafne Accoroni & Eunice Cascant & Lauren Dixon & Noémie Dominguez & Emily Mugel & Catherine Mercier-Suissa & Maité Pinchon & Nancy Ottaviano, 2021. "Report on the analysis of an innovative housing project promoting refugees' integration in France: the case of the Cinq Toits (Paris)," Working Papers halshs-03450408, HAL.
    12. Valentin Herbold & Hannes Thees & Julian Philipp, 2020. "The Host Community and Its Role in Sports Tourism—Exploring an Emerging Research Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Sara Brysch, 2019. "Reinterpreting Existenzminimum in Contemporary Affordable Housing Solutions," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 326-345.
    14. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    15. Eusebius Pantja Pramudya & Lukas Rumboko Wibowo & Fitri Nurfatriani & Iman Kasiman Nawireja & Dewi Ratna Kurniasari & Sakti Hutabarat & Yohanes Berenika Kadarusman & Ananda Oemi Iswardhani & Rukaiyah , 2022. "Incentives for Palm Oil Smallholders in Mandatory Certification in Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, April.
    16. Peter Schnell & Phillip Haag & Hans Christian Jünger, 2022. "Implementation of Digital Technologies in Construction Companies: Establishing a Holistic Process which Addresses Current Barriers," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.
    18. Hongxia Jin & Lu Lu & Haojun Fan, 2022. "Global Trends and Research Hotspots in Long COVID: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Prince Donkor Ameyaw & Walter Timo de Vries, 2020. "Transparency of Land Administration and the Role of Blockchain Technology, a Four-Dimensional Framework Analysis from the Ghanaian Land Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Amal Almansour & Reem Alotaibi & Hajar Alharbi, 2022. "Text-rating review discrepancy (TRRD): an integrative review and implications for research," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2595-:d:756849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.