IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p6725-d401152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eco-Efficient Analysis of a Refurbishment Proposal for a Social Housing

Author

Listed:
  • Pilar Mercader-Moyano

    (Departamento de Construcciones Arquitectónicas I, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad de Sevilla, Avenida de Reina Mercedes nº2, 41012 Seville, Spain)

  • Paula M. Esquivias

    (GIR Termotecnia, Departamento de Ingeniería Energética y Fluidomecánica, Universidad de Valladolid, Paseo del Cauce nº 59, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Radu Muntean

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500152 Brașov, Romania)

Abstract

In recent years, the building sector has been turning towards intervening in the existing city building stock. In fact, it is generally accepted that the refurbishment of buildings based on sustainability must form the axis of reformulation of the building sector. Although energy refurbishment is commonly accepted and recommended towards decarbonization of the building stock, an integral assessment towards implementing the principles of the circular economy must incorporate the environmental impact of the materials in order to get an eco-efficient refurbishment. The article presents the environmental analysis of a social housing located in Cadiz (Spain) and the improvements achieved by its refurbishment. This intervention is improved by incorporating eco-efficient materials based on the environmental and life cycle analysis (LCA). Those analyses are performed using EnergyPlus, Radiance, LCA standards, and Environmental Product Declaration of the products. The results shown that although an energy rehabilitation intervention can fulfil other eco-efficient aspects, an integral assessment should always be carried out in order to ensure that indoor comfort is achieved, daylighting and solar heat gains are balanced, and the environmental impact at product, use, and end-of-life stages of a building is minimized. Considering the constrains and limitations of the tools and databases, higher efforts should be done to solve them and provide useful resources for a decarbonized and circular building stock.

Suggested Citation

  • Pilar Mercader-Moyano & Paula M. Esquivias & Radu Muntean, 2020. "Eco-Efficient Analysis of a Refurbishment Proposal for a Social Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-31, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6725-:d:401152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6725/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6725/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Juan Aranda & Ignacio Zabalza & Andrea Conserva & Gema Millán, 2017. "Analysis of Energy Efficiency Measures and Retrofitting Solutions for Social Housing Buildings in Spain as a Way to Mitigate Energy Poverty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ikram Merini & Angel Molina-García & M. Socorro García-Cascales & Mustapha Mahdaoui & Mohamed Ahachad, 2020. "Analysis and Comparison of Energy Efficiency Code Requirements for Buildings: A Morocco–Spain Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Marcelle Engler Bridi & Joao Soliman-Junior & Ariovaldo Denis Granja & Patricia Tzortzopoulos & Vanessa Gomes & Doris Catharine Cornelie Knatz Kowaltowski, 2022. "Living Labs in Social Housing Upgrades: Process, Challenges and Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio Gómez Melgar & Miguel Ángel Martínez Bohórquez & José Manuel Andújar Márquez, 2020. "uhuMEBr: Energy Refurbishment of Existing Buildings in Subtropical Climates to Become Minimum Energy Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-35, March.
    2. Hansjörg Drewello, 2022. "Towards a Theory of Local Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Bragolusi, Paolo & D'Alpaos, Chiara, 2022. "The valuation of buildings energy retrofitting: A multiple-criteria approach to reconcile cost-benefit trade-offs and energy savings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    4. Zhaoxia Wang & Jing Zhao, 2018. "Optimization of Passive Envelop Energy Efficient Measures for Office Buildings in Different Climate Regions of China Based on Modified Sensitivity Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, March.
    5. Dong, Kangyin & Dou, Yue & Jiang, Qingzhe, 2022. "Income inequality, energy poverty, and energy efficiency: Who cause who and how?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    6. Maryam Khazaee & Siamak Hosseinzadeh & Saeed Khorrami & Davide Astiaso Garcia & Mosè Ricci, 2024. "Volumetric Add-On Retrofit Strategy with Multi-Benefit Approach toward Nearly Zero Energy Buildings Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Maatouk Khoukhi & Abeer Fuad Darsaleh & Sara Ali, 2020. "Retrofitting an Existing Office Building in the UAE Towards Achieving Low-Energy Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Fernando Martín-Consuegra & Fernando de Frutos & Ignacio Oteiza & Carmen Alonso & Borja Frutos, 2020. "Minimal Monitoring of Improvements in Energy Performance after Envelope Renovation in Subsidized Single Family Housing in Madrid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Grazini, Chiara, 2024. "Energy poverty as capacity deprivation: A study of social housing using the partially ordered set," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Wenyang Han & Meng Han & Menglong Zhang & Ying Zhao & Kai Xie & Yin Zhang, 2024. "Historic Building Renovation with Solar System towards Zero-Energy Consumption: Feasibility Analysis and Case Optimization Practice in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Sangeetha Chandrashekeran & Viktoria Noka & Stefan Bouzarovski, 2022. "Energy Poverty: Measurement and Governance in Europe and Lessons for Australia," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 55(4), pages 491-502, December.
    12. Dania Ortiz & Vítor Leal & Isabel Azevedo, 2020. "A Review of the Measures and Instruments to Promote Efficiency and Renewable Energy in Domestic Water Heating," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Scarpellini, Sabina & Alexia Sanz Hernández, M. & Moneva, José M. & Portillo-Tarragona, Pilar & Rodríguez, María Esther López, 2019. "Measurement of spatial socioeconomic impact of energy poverty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 320-331.
    14. Ferrari, Simone & Blázquez, Teresa & Dall'O', Giuliano, 2021. "Energy performance indexes based on monitored data of social housing buildings in Northern Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    15. Katerina Sojkova & Martin Volf & Antonin Lupisek & Roman Bolliger & Tomas Vachal, 2019. "Selection of Favourable Concept of Energy Retrofitting Solution for Social Housing in the Czech Republic Based on Economic Parameters, Greenhouse Gases, and Primary Energy Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-26, November.
    16. John M. Polimeni & Mihaela Simionescu & Raluca I. Iorgulescu, 2022. "Energy Poverty and Personal Health in the EU," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Stefan Bouzarovski & Harriet Thomson & Marine Cornelis, 2021. "Confronting Energy Poverty in Europe: A Research and Policy Agenda," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Wang, Ying & Wang, Yong & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2023. "How does digital economy affect energy poverty? Analysis from the global perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    19. Andrea Boeri & Valentina Gianfrate & Saveria Olga Murielle Boulanger & Martina Massari, 2020. "Future Design Approaches for Energy Poverty: Users Profiling and Services for No-Vulnerable Condition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6725-:d:401152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.