IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2337-d752531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Methodology for Planning and Prioritisation of Rural Roads in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Musleh Uddin Hasan

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh)

  • A S M Abdul Quium

    (Former Expert, UNESCAP, Bangkok 10200, Thailand)

  • Mashrur Rahman

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh)

  • Farzana Khatun

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh)

  • Mohammad Shakil Akther

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh)

  • Afsana Haque

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh)

  • Sarwar Jahan

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh)

  • Ishrat Islam

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh)

  • Tanjeeb Ahmed

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh)

  • Tanvir Hossain Shubho

    (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh)

Abstract

Local government bodies and other concerned agencies in developing countries spend a considerable amount of money on rural road development. However, in the absence of any robust and systematic methodology, road development largely relies on ad-hoc decisions and subjective judgement of public officials. Such a decision-making process often leads to inefficient resource allocation bypassing equity and long-term societal benefits. Although there are some established methodologies for road network planning, complexities exist in applying those methods. First, most of the established methods are not suitable for rural road development, particularly regarding the volume and nature of traffic on them. Second, some methods are highly complex and lack practical applicability. Third, road development planning should not be top-down alone but ensure the participation of local stakeholders. Given these limitations, this study proposes a methodology—Rural Road Planning and Prioritisation Model (RPPM). It consists of two major components (i) developing a core network in participation with local stakeholders and (ii) prioritisation of roads based on Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) and Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA). The proposed method is piloted in one district, and a web-based software is also developed for practical implementation by the Local Government Engineering Department (LGED), Bangladesh. The paper also discusses the results of the pilot study.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Musleh Uddin Hasan & A S M Abdul Quium & Mashrur Rahman & Farzana Khatun & Mohammad Shakil Akther & Afsana Haque & Sarwar Jahan & Ishrat Islam & Tanjeeb Ahmed & Tanvir Hossain Shubho, 2022. "A Methodology for Planning and Prioritisation of Rural Roads in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2337-:d:752531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2337/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2337/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olsson, Jerry, 2009. "Improved road accessibility and indirect development effects: evidence from rural Philippines," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 476-483.
    2. Jerry Lebo & Dieter Schelling, 2001. "Design and Appraisal of Rural Transport Infrastructure : Ensuring Basic Access for Rural Communities," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13911.
    3. Zhou Zhou & Jianqiang Duan & Wenxing Li & Shaoqing Geng, 2021. "Can Rural Road Construction Promote the Sustainable Development of Regional Agriculture in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-32, September.
    4. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Miandoabchi, Elnaz & Szeto, W.Y. & Rashidi, Hannaneh, 2013. "A review of urban transportation network design problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 281-302.
    5. Yedla, Sudhakar & Shrestha, Ram M., 2003. "Multi-criteria approach for the selection of alternative options for environmentally sustainable transport system in Delhi," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 717-729, October.
    6. van Oudheusden, Dirk L. & Lutfar Rahman Khan, Md., 1987. "Planning and development of rural road networks in developing countries," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 353-362, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akpan, Uduak & Morimoto, Risako, 2022. "An application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) to the prioritization of rural roads to improve rural accessibility in Nigeria," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    2. Neupane, Deependra & Kafle, Sagar & Karki, Kaji Ram & Kim, Dae Hyun & Pradhan, Prajal, 2022. "Solar and wind energy potential assessment at provincial level in Nepal: Geospatial and economic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 278-291.
    3. Al-Alawi, Baha M. & Coker, Alexander D., 2018. "Multi-criteria decision support system with negotiation process for vehicle technology selection," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 278-296.
    4. Liang, Jinpeng & Wu, Jianjun & Gao, Ziyou & Sun, Huijun & Yang, Xin & Lo, Hong K., 2019. "Bus transit network design with uncertainties on the basis of a metro network: A two-step model framework," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 115-138.
    5. Ying Lu & Walter Timo de Vries, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Rural Development in China over the Past 40 Years," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Weckström, Christoffer & Mladenović, Miloš N. & Kujala, Rainer & Saramäki, Jari, 2021. "Navigability assessment of large-scale redesigns in nine public transport networks: Open timetable data approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 212-229.
    7. Jelena Kilić Pamuković & Katarina Rogulj & Daniela Dumanić & Nikša Jajac, 2020. "A Sustainable Approach for the Maintenance of Asphalt Pavement Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Venter, Christoffel J. & Molomo, Malesela & Mashiri, Mac, 2014. "Supply and pricing strategies of informal rural transport providers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 239-248.
    9. Nayan, Ashish & Wang, David Z.W., 2017. "Optimal bus transit route packaging in a privatized contracting regime," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 146-157.
    10. Schürenberg-Frosch, Hannah, 2012. "Determinants of transport costs: Are they uniform across countries?," Economics Discussion Papers 2012-54, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    11. David Canca & Belén Navarro-Carmona & Gabriel Villa & Alejandro Zarzo, 2023. "A Multilayer Network Approach for the Bimodal Bus–Pedestrian Line Planning Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-36, October.
    12. Asian Development Bank Institute, 2017. "Myanmar Transport Sector Policy Note: Rural Roads and Access," Working Papers id:11782, eSocialSciences.
    13. Ali Najmi & Taha H. Rashidi & Alireza Abbasi & S. Travis Waller, 2017. "Reviewing the transport domain: an evolutionary bibliometrics and network analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 843-865, February.
    14. Wang, Jian & He, Xiaozheng & Peeta, Srinivas & Wang, Wei, 2022. "Globally convergent line search algorithm with Euler-based step size-determination method for continuous network design problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 119-144.
    15. Amirali Zarrinmehr & Mahmoud Saffarzadeh & Seyedehsan Seyedabrishami & Yu Marco Nie, 2016. "A path-based greedy algorithm for multi-objective transit routes design with elastic demand," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 261-293, September.
    16. Barahimi, Amir Hossein & Eydi, Alireza & Aghaie, Abdolah, 2021. "Multi-modal urban transit network design considering reliability: multi-objective bi-level optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Harshad Khadilkar, 2017. "Data-Enabled Stochastic Modeling for Evaluating Schedule Robustness of Railway Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1161-1176, November.
    18. Ahern, Zeke & Paz, Alexander & Corry, Paul, 2022. "Approximate multi-objective optimization for integrated bus route design and service frequency setting," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1-25.
    19. AlSabbagh, Maha & Siu, Yim Ling & Guehnemann, Astrid & Barrett, John, 2017. "Integrated approach to the assessment of CO2e-mitigation measures for the road passenger transport sector in Bahrain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 203-215.
    20. Yanyan Gao & Xinping Wang, 2023. "Chinese agriculture in the age of high‐speed rail: Effects on agricultural value added and food output," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 387-405, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2337-:d:752531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.