IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15840-d986776.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factorial Design with Simulation for the Optimization of the Level of Service in the Platform-Train Interface of Metro Stations—A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Matias Kulczewski

    (Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago de Chile 7620001, Chile)

  • Andres Wilson

    (Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago de Chile 7620001, Chile)

  • Sebastian Seriani

    (Escuela de Ingeniería de Construcción y Transporte, Pontifica Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362804, Chile)

  • Taku Fujiyama

    (Faculty of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, Chadwick Building, Gower St., London WC1E 6BT, UK)

Abstract

Metro stations are considered complex areas of pedestrian mobility due to the increasing congestion, due to the a high level of demand of different circulation spaces. Given this situation and the limited physical spaces remaining to develop transport systems in urban areas, railways acquire greater relevance given the need to mobilize pedestrians. Within the stations, the most problematic area is the platform-train interface (PTI) due to the high number of interactions between passengers boarding and alighting. The objective of this study is to identify the PTI configuration that maximizes the level of service for passengers, safeguards the operational continuity of the system and improves user experience by reducing dissatisfaction and delay times. For this, a pedestrian microsimulation model is used in order to recreate the reality of a generic metro station and its different scenarios given the combinations of two factors: the platform configurations (topology) and the traffic control elements. Subsequently, these scenarios are analyzed through a factorial design, looking for the situation that optimizes the combination of metrics chosen in a weighted way. Finally, it is found that the PTI configuration that maximizes the level of service for users is the mixed station with signaling. It is this which includes the factors with the greatest positive effect on the chosen metrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Matias Kulczewski & Andres Wilson & Sebastian Seriani & Taku Fujiyama, 2022. "Factorial Design with Simulation for the Optimization of the Level of Service in the Platform-Train Interface of Metro Stations—A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15840-:d:986776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15840/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15840/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xenia Karekla & Nick Tyler, 2012. "Reduced dwell times resulting from train--platform improvements: the costs and benefits of improving passenger accessibility to metro trains," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 525-543, January.
    2. Fernández, Rodrigo & Valencia, Alejandra & Seriani, Sebastian, 2015. "On passenger saturation flow in public transport doors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 102-112.
    3. Sebastian Seriani & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes & Paola Moraga & Fabian Cortes, 2022. "Experimental Location of the Vertical Handrail to Improve the Accessibility of Wheelchair Passengers Boarding and Alighting at Metro Stations—A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Sebastian Seriani & Taku Fujiyama & Catherine Holloway, 2017. "Exploring the pedestrian level of interaction on platform conflict areas at metro stations by real-scale laboratory experiments," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 100-118, January.
    5. Guo, Ren-Yong & Wong, S.C. & Huang, Hai-Jun & Zhang, Peng & Lam, William H.K., 2010. "A microscopic pedestrian-simulation model and its application to intersecting flows," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(3), pages 515-526.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Shuaian & Zhang, Wei & Qu, Xiaobo, 2018. "Trial-and-error train fare design scheme for addressing boarding/alighting congestion at CBD stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 318-335.
    2. Sebastian Seriani & Jose Miguel Barriga & Alvaro Peña & Alejandra Valencia & Vicente Aprigliano & Lorena Jorquera & Hernan Pinto & Matías Valenzuela & Taku Fujiyama, 2022. "Analyzing the Effect of Crowds on Passenger Behavior Inside Urban Trains through Laboratory Experiments—A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid & Shahhoseini, Zahra, 2019. "When ‘push’ does not come to ‘shove’: Revisiting ‘faster is slower’ in collective egress of human crowds," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 51-69.
    4. Paulo Aguayo & Sebastian Seriani & Jose Delpiano & Gonzalo Farias & Taku Fujiyama & Sergio A. Velastin, 2023. "Experimental Method to Estimate the Density of Passengers on Urban Railway Platforms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Ji, Yanjie & Gao, Liangpeng & Chen, Dandan & Ma, Xinwei & Zhang, Ruochen, 2018. "How does a static measure influence passengers’ boarding behaviors and bus dwell time? Simulated evidence from Nanjing bus stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 13-25.
    6. Jun Zhang & Qiannan Ai & Yuling Ye & Shejun Deng, 2024. "Dynamic flow analysis and crowd management for transfer stations: a case study of Suzhou Metro," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 619-653, June.
    7. Xu, Xin-yue & Liu, Jun & Li, Hai-ying & Jiang, Man, 2016. "Capacity-oriented passenger flow control under uncertain demand: Algorithm development and real-world case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 130-148.
    8. Sewmini Jayatilake & Jonathan M. Bunker & Ashish Bhaskar & Marc Miska, 2021. "Time–space analysis to evaluate cell-based quality of service in bus rapid transit station platforms through passenger-specific area," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 395-427, June.
    9. Liang, Jinpeng & Zang, Guangzhi & Liu, Haitao & Zheng, Jianfeng & Gao, Ziyou, 2023. "Reducing passenger waiting time in oversaturated metro lines with passenger flow control policy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    10. Lovreglio, Ruggiero & Ronchi, Enrico & Nilsson, Daniel, 2015. "Calibrating floor field cellular automaton models for pedestrian dynamics by using likelihood function optimization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 438(C), pages 308-320.
    11. Canca, David & Zarzo, Alejandro & Algaba, Encarnación & Barrena, Eva, 2013. "Macroscopic attraction-based simulation of pedestrian mobility: A dynamic individual route-choice approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 428-442.
    12. Zhou, Zi-Xuan & Nakanishi, Wataru & Asakura, Yasuo, 2021. "Route choice in the pedestrian evacuation: Microscopic formulation based on visual information," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 562(C).
    13. Kostyniuk, Lidia P. & D'Souza, Clive R., 2020. "Effect of passenger encumbrance and mobility aid use on dwell time variability in low-floor transit vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 872-881.
    14. Sun, Lishan & Luo, Wei & Yao, Liya & Qiu, Shi & Rong, Jian, 2017. "A comparative study of funnel shape bottlenecks in subway stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 14-27.
    15. Li, Chuan-Yao & Yang, Rui-Yu & Xu, Guang-ming, 2019. "Impacts of group behavior on boarding process at the platform of high speed railway station," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 535(C).
    16. Luo, Lin & Liu, Xiaobo & Fu, Zhijian & Ma, Jian & Liu, Fanxiao, 2020. "Modeling following behavior and right-side-preference in multidirectional pedestrian flows by modified FFCA," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 550(C).
    17. Offiaeli, K. & Yaman, F., 2020. "Social Norms as a Cost-Effective Measure of Managing Transport Demand: Evidence from an Experiment on the London Underground," Working Papers 20/07, Department of Economics, City University London.
    18. Offiaeli, Kingsley & Yaman, Firat, 2021. "Social norms as a cost-effective measure of managing transport demand: Evidence from an experiment on the London underground," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 63-80.
    19. Mira Küpper & Armin Seyfried, 2020. "Analysis of Space Usage on Train Station Platforms Based on Trajectory Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Guo, Ren-Yong & Huang, Hai-Jun & Wong, S.C., 2011. "Collection, spillback, and dissipation in pedestrian evacuation: A network-based method," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 490-506, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15840-:d:986776. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.