IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/pubtra/v13y2021i2d10.1007_s12469-021-00267-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time–space analysis to evaluate cell-based quality of service in bus rapid transit station platforms through passenger-specific area

Author

Listed:
  • Sewmini Jayatilake

    (Queensland University of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering)

  • Jonathan M. Bunker

    (Queensland University of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering)

  • Ashish Bhaskar

    (Queensland University of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering)

  • Marc Miska

    (Queensland University of Technology, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering)

Abstract

It is important to evaluate the quality of service (QoS) of bus rapid transit (BRT) station platform operation. Passenger-specific area (PSA) is used as a QoS measure which is determined by considering passenger activities separately. As passengers perform various activities on the same platform space, there is a need to evaluate BRT platform QoS by considering the activities collectively. When evaluating transit station platforms, many researchers calculated PSA for the whole platform area, while very few researchers highlighted the importance of evaluating the platform as small, partitioned areas. By considering these findings and gaps in the literature, this study evaluates QoS of the platform on a cell by cell basis using PSA. We use time–space analysis and passenger-minutes of each activity to develop a methodology to determine PSA, by considering stationary passengers, circulating passengers, and passengers overall. To evaluate platform QoS, we define threshold service levels using passenger-minutes of activities and Fruin’s QoS criteria. For the case study BRT station, we find that PSA varies significantly between platform cells. It is evident from the results that it is important to identify highly congested areas in the platform and apply measures to improve platform QoS.

Suggested Citation

  • Sewmini Jayatilake & Jonathan M. Bunker & Ashish Bhaskar & Marc Miska, 2021. "Time–space analysis to evaluate cell-based quality of service in bus rapid transit station platforms through passenger-specific area," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 395-427, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:13:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12469-021-00267-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s12469-021-00267-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12469-021-00267-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12469-021-00267-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan M. Bunker, 2018. "High volume bus stop upstream average waiting time for working capacity and quality of service," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 311-333, August.
    2. Md Rokibul Islam & Md Hadiuzzaman & Rajib Banik & Md Mehedi Hasnat & Sarder Rafee Musabbir & Sanjana Hossain, 2016. "Bus service quality prediction and attribute ranking: a neural network approach," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 295-313, September.
    3. Sebastian Seriani & Taku Fujiyama & Catherine Holloway, 2017. "Exploring the pedestrian level of interaction on platform conflict areas at metro stations by real-scale laboratory experiments," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 100-118, January.
    4. Hänseler, Flurin S. & Bierlaire, Michel & Scarinci, Riccardo, 2016. "Assessing the usage and level-of-service of pedestrian facilities in train stations: A Swiss case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 106-123.
    5. Lam, William H. K. & Cheung, Chung-Yu & Lam, C. F., 1999. "A study of crowding effects at the Hong Kong light rail transit stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 401-415, June.
    6. Bo Yang & Xuedong Yan & Dahai Guo, 2015. "Level of Service Analysis Based on Maximum Number of Passengers in Waiting Room of Railway Passenger Station Using Arena Simulation," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Seriani & Jose Miguel Barriga & Alvaro Peña & Alejandra Valencia & Vicente Aprigliano & Lorena Jorquera & Hernan Pinto & Matías Valenzuela & Taku Fujiyama, 2022. "Analyzing the Effect of Crowds on Passenger Behavior Inside Urban Trains through Laboratory Experiments—A Pilot Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Hänseler, Flurin S. & van den Heuvel, Jeroen P.A. & Cats, Oded & Daamen, Winnie & Hoogendoorn, Serge P., 2020. "A passenger-pedestrian model to assess platform and train usage from automated data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 948-968.
    3. Xiaomeng Shi & Zhirui Ye & Nirajan Shiwakoti & Huaxin Li, 2019. "Passengers’ Perceptions of Security Check in Metro Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    4. de Palma, André & Lindsey, Robin, 2001. "Optimal timetables for public transportation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 789-813, September.
    5. Zhonghua Wei & Sinan Chu & Zhengde Huang & Shi Qiu & Qixuan Zhao, 2020. "Optimization Design of X-ray Conveyer Belt Length for Subway Security Check Systems in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Sebastian Seriani & Vicente Aprigliano & Shirley Gonzalez & Gabriela Baeza & Ariel Lopez & Taku Fujiyama, 2024. "The Effect of Seat Layout on the Interaction of Passengers Inside the Train Carriage: An Experimental Approach for Urban Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Basu, Debasis & Hunt, John Douglas, 2012. "Valuing of attributes influencing the attractiveness of suburban train service in Mumbai city: A stated preference approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1465-1476.
    8. Ji, Yanjie & Gao, Liangpeng & Chen, Dandan & Ma, Xinwei & Zhang, Ruochen, 2018. "How does a static measure influence passengers’ boarding behaviors and bus dwell time? Simulated evidence from Nanjing bus stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 13-25.
    9. Wang, Shuaian & Zhang, Wei & Qu, Xiaobo, 2018. "Trial-and-error train fare design scheme for addressing boarding/alighting congestion at CBD stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 318-335.
    10. Haghani, Milad & Sarvi, Majid & Shahhoseini, Zahra, 2019. "When ‘push’ does not come to ‘shove’: Revisiting ‘faster is slower’ in collective egress of human crowds," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 51-69.
    11. Hanumantha Rao Sama & Long-Sheng Chen & Venkateswarlu Nalluri & Madhavaiah Chendragiri, 2023. "Enhancing service quality of rural public transport during the COVID-19 pandemic: a novel fuzzy approach," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 479-501, June.
    12. Flurin S. Hänseler & Nicholas A. Molyneaux & Michel Bierlaire, 2017. "Estimation of Pedestrian Origin-Destination Demand in Train Stations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 981-997, August.
    13. Yuriy Royko & Yevhen Fornalchyk & Eugeniusz Koda & Ivan Kernytskyy & Oleh Hrytsun & Romana Bura & Piotr Osinski & Anna Markiewicz & Tomasz Wierzbicki & Ruslan Barabash & Ruslan Humenuyk & Pavlo Polyan, 2023. "Public Transport Prioritization and Descriptive Criteria-Based Urban Sections Classification on Arterial Streets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Díez-Mesa, Francisco & de Oña, Rocio & de Oña, Juan, 2018. "Bayesian networks and structural equation modelling to develop service quality models: Metro of Seville case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-13.
    15. Tirachini, Alejandro & Hurtubia, Ricardo & Dekker, Thijs & Daziano, Ricardo A., 2017. "Estimation of crowding discomfort in public transport: Results from Santiago de Chile," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 311-326.
    16. de Palma, André & Kilani, Moez & Proost, Stef, 2015. "Discomfort in mass transit and its implication for scheduling and pricing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-18.
    17. Mohammad Sadrani & Ahmad Reza Jafarian-Moghaddam & Mohsen Aboutalebi Esfahani & Amir Masoud Rahimi, 2023. "Designing limited-stop bus services for minimizing operator and user costs under crowding conditions," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 97-128, March.
    18. Liu, Peng & Xu, Shu-Xian & Ong, Ghim Ping & Tian, Qiong & Ma, Shoufeng, 2021. "Effect of autonomous vehicles on travel and urban characteristics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 128-148.
    19. Yang, Xin & Xue, Qiuchi & Ding, Meiling & Wu, Jianjun & Gao, Ziyou, 2021. "Short-term prediction of passenger volume for urban rail systems: A deep learning approach based on smart-card data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    20. Johansson, Fredrik & Peterson, Anders & Tapani, Andreas, 2015. "Waiting pedestrians in the social force model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 419(C), pages 95-107.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bus rapid transit; Station platforms; Platform cell; Time–space analysis; Passenger-specific area; Quality of service; Service levels;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R15 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Econometric and Input-Output Models; Other Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:pubtra:v:13:y:2021:i:2:d:10.1007_s12469-021-00267-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.