IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14239-d959475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Awareness and Expectations of Polish Consumers Regarding Edible Niche Oils as a Food Product

Author

Listed:
  • Kamil Czwartkowski

    (Department of Production and Labor Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Arkadiusz Wierzbic

    (Department of Production and Labor Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Wojciech Golimowski

    (Department of Agroengineering and Quality Analysis, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Komandroska 118/120, 53-345 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

Despite their nutritional value and increasing supply of oils from unconventional plants to the oil industry, edible niche oils do not have high sales. The market for niche oils is geared toward an ever-growing volume of conscious consumers distinguished by their sensitivity to product quality, packaging type, price, sourcing technology, and variety of product use. In the literature, there is a lack of research on consumer preferences and expectations of niche oils. This article continues a series of studies on niche oils aimed at determining the proper technological parameters for production, discussing the economic aspects of niche oil production, and researching consumer behavior concerning these products. It aims to determine Polish consumers’ awareness and expectations of edible niche oils, select the oils of most significant interest to consumers, and determine the factors influencing consumers’ propensity to try edible niche oils. The survey, in the form of a questionnaire, was conducted using the CAWI method on a representative sample of 1000 Polish consumers. Consumers were divided into four segments: those who regularly consume niche oils, consumers who have experience with niche oils, consumers who are familiar with them but have not tried them, and consumers who do not know niche oils. Data were analyzed collectively and separately for each segment using one-way ANOVA. Grape seed oils and edible castor oil are the most interesting to consumers. Consumers’ purchasing decisions are influenced by price, nutrient content, and sustainable production free of GMO products and harmful chemicals. Therefore, manufacturers should increase the availability of certain oils (e.g., peanut oil). Sensory qualities, place of production, and brand recognition are secondary selection criteria. Future research should focus on the organoleptic evaluation of products available on the market. Research results may be used to create production and marketing strategies to make niche oils more attractive to consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamil Czwartkowski & Arkadiusz Wierzbic & Wojciech Golimowski, 2022. "Awareness and Expectations of Polish Consumers Regarding Edible Niche Oils as a Food Product," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14239-:d:959475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14239/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14239/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angelo Corallo & Maria Elena Latino & Marta Menegoli & Alessandra Spennato, 2019. "A Survey to Discover Current Food Choice Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Hoskins, Jake D., 2020. "The evolving role of hit and niche products in brick-and-mortar retail category assortment planning: A large-scale empirical investigation of U.S. consumer packaged goods," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    3. Kamil Czwartkowski & Arkadiusz Wierzbic & Wojciech Golimowski, 2022. "Quality, Key Production Factors, and Consumption Volume of Niche Edible Oils Marketed in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Anda Fridrihsone & Francesco Romagnoli & Ugis Cabulis, 2020. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Rapeseed and Rapeseed Oil Produced in Northern Europe: A Latvian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Giulia Sesini & Cinzia Castiglioni & Edoardo Lozza, 2020. "New Trends and Patterns in Sustainable Consumption: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-25, July.
    6. Yi-Chih Lee, 2021. "Replacing Work with Study: A Sustainable Development Strategy for Economically or Culturally Disadvantaged Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Mario Pagliacci & Adriana Manolica & Teodora Roman & Gabriela Boldureanu, 2019. "The Consumers of Green Products. The Case of Romanian Moldavia Counties," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(S13), pages 830-830, November.
    8. Mattia Rapa & Salvatore Ciano & Andrea Rocchi & Fabrizio D’Ascenzo & Roberto Ruggieri & Giuliana Vinci, 2019. "Hempseed Oil Quality Parameters: Optimization of Sustainable Methods by Miniaturization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Li Bai & Mingliang Wang & Shunlong Gong, 2019. "Understanding the Antecedents of Organic Food Purchases: The Important Roles of Beliefs, Subjective Norms, and Identity Expressiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Gratiela Dana Boca, 2021. "Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior in Sustainable Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Maramures County, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Moser, Riccarda & Raffaelli, Roberta & Thilmany, Dawn D., 2011. "Consumer Preferences for Fruit and Vegetables with Credence-Based Attributes: A Review," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 14(2), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Souleymane Zio & Yves Traore & Aly Savadogo & Hama Cisse & Oumarou Zongo & Flibert Guira & Francois Tapsoba & Siourime Somda & Fatoumata Hama-Ba & Laurencia Toulsoumde Songre-Ouattara & Cheikna Zongo, 2020. "The Oils Refining Process and Contaminants in Edible Oils: A Review," Journal of Food Technology Research, Conscientia Beam, vol. 7(1), pages 9-47.
    13. Agnieszka Sagan & Agata Blicharz-Kania & Marek Szmigielski & Dariusz Andrejko & Paweł Sobczak & Kazimierz Zawiślak & Agnieszka Starek, 2019. "Assessment of the Properties of Rapeseed Oil Enriched with Oils Characterized by High Content of α-linolenic Acid," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-11, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gratiela Dana Boca, 2021. "Factors Influencing Consumer Behavior in Sustainable Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Maramures County, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Kamil Czwartkowski & Arkadiusz Wierzbic & Wojciech Golimowski, 2022. "Quality, Key Production Factors, and Consumption Volume of Niche Edible Oils Marketed in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Giuseppina Migliore & Giuseppina Rizzo & Giorgio Schifani & Giuseppe Quatrosi & Luigi Vetri & Riccardo Testa, 2021. "Ethnocentrism Effects on Consumers’ Behavior during COVID-19 Pandemic," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Cai, Xiang & Adjei, Mavis & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Obuobi, Bright, 2022. "Citizens’ intention to invest in municipal solid waste to energy projects in Ghana: The impact of direct and indirect effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    5. Robinson, Chadelle, . "Exploring the Hierarchy of Product Attributes in U.S. Pecan Consumption," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 51(2).
    6. Barlagne, Carla & Bazoche, Pascale & Thomas, Alban & Ozier-Lafontaine, Harry & Causeret, François & Blazy, Jean-Marc, 2015. "Promoting local foods in small island states: The role of information policies," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 62-72.
    7. Salvatore Ciano & S?verine Goscinny & Giuliana Vinci, 2020. "Hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.): Sustainability and challenges for the food sector," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(1), pages 179-194.
    8. Sharifi, Roya & Kheiri, Bahram & Ghofrani, Yalda Rahmati, 2021. "Presenting the Behavioral Model of Real Buyers of Organic Products in Guilan Province," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 11(2), June.
    9. Mireia Ercilla-Montserrat & David Sanjuan-Delmás & Esther Sanyé-Mengual & Laura Calvet-Mir & Karla Banderas & Joan Rieradevall & Xavier Gabarrell, 2019. "Analysis of the consumer’s perception of urban food products from a soilless system in rooftop greenhouses: a case study from the Mediterranean area of Barcelona (Spain)," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(3), pages 375-393, September.
    10. Dávid Szakos & László Ózsvári & Gyula Kasza, 2020. "Perception of Older Adults about Health-Related Functionality of Foods Compared with Other Age Groups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Yaprak Kurtsal & Davide Viaggi, 2020. "Exploring Collaboration and Consumer Behavior in Food Community Networks and Constraints Preventing Active Participation: The Case of Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    12. Lauri Leppäkoski & Miika P. Marttila & Ville Uusitalo & Jarkko Levänen & Vilma Halonen & Mirja H. Mikkilä, 2021. "Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Biochar from Willow Grown on Marginal Lands in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Aluisio Goulart Silva & Maurizio Canavari & Alcido Elenor Wander, 2018. "Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for integrated production label on common beans," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 20(1), pages 11-28.
    14. Dominic Lemken & Mandy Knigge & Stephan Meyerding & Achim Spiller, 2017. "The Value of Environmental and Health Claims on New Legume Products: A Non-Hypothetical Online Auction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Adhikari, Rajendra Prasad & Collins, Ray & Sun, Ximing, 2012. "Segmenting Consumers to Inform Agrifood Value Chain Development in Nepal," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Vesselin Blagoev & Elena Shustova & Inna Mischenko, 2021. "Buyer Behaviour in the Case of Organic Agricultural Products," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 124-139.
    17. Shiela Mae C. Ilagan & Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Josephine D. German & Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Kyla Marie P. Pabalan, 2024. "Holistic Antecedent Analysis of Behavioral Intention among Green Consumers in the Philippines: A Sustainability Theory of the Planned Behavior Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    18. Parkhomets, Mykola & Uniiat, Liudmyla & Chornyi, Roman & Chorna, Nelia & Hradovyi, Vasyl, 2023. "Efficiency of production and processing of rapeseed for biodiesel in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(2), June.
    19. Ildikó Kovács & Marietta Balázsné Lendvai & Judit Beke, 2022. "The Importance of Food Attributes and Motivational Factors for Purchasing Local Food Products: Segmentation of Young Local Food Consumers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    20. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Brândușa Mariana Bejan & Claudiu Pușcaș, 2020. "A Qualitative Approach to the Sustainable Orientation of Generation Z in Retail: The Case of Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14239-:d:959475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.