IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14137-d957373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Scope of Public Participation for Risk Sensitive Land Use Planning in Nepal: A Policy Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ashrika Sharma

    (School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK)

  • Katherine Donovan

    (School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK)

  • Sukanya Krishnamurthy

    (School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK)

  • Maggie Creed

    (James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK)

Abstract

Risk Sensitive Land Use Planning (RSLUP), a process that has implications for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) as well as Urban Planning and Development, requires the participation of the public and wider stakeholders. Public participation has been conceptualized in Nepal’s disaster governance after the country transitioned into a federal democracy. It has undergone decentralization as part of the federal reform process, including its undertakings towards DRR. However, it remains unclear what this redistribution of authority means for public participation in relation to RSLUP. It is important to ask whether the current institutional set up and policy instruments are conducive for public participation. Therefore, this article examines how participation is construed within relevant federal and local policies in Nepal. The article presents a thematic analysis of leading policy instruments. The research reveals that participation emerges as a constitutional principle but the concept of participation itself is characterised by definitional ambiguity. Although most policies encourage the creation of spaces for public participation, this research reveals that these spaces are limited in implementation and impact. Lack of clear guidelines on how to design and implement public participation can hinder effective practice. Non-binding language within policy documents makes it difficult to understand the intended outcome of participation. This paper illustrates the extent to which participation has become a malleable construct that can have repercussions for ways in which RSLUP is enacted and enforced, in both Nepal and other countries who share similar socio-political context.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashrika Sharma & Katherine Donovan & Sukanya Krishnamurthy & Maggie Creed, 2022. "Exploring the Scope of Public Participation for Risk Sensitive Land Use Planning in Nepal: A Policy Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14137-:d:957373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14137/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14137/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gwendolyn Blue & Marit Rosol & Victoria Fast, 2019. "Justice as Parity of Participation," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 85(3), pages 363-376, July.
    2. Ahmad Farhan Roslan & Terrence Fernando & Sara Biscaya & Noralfishah Sulaiman, 2021. "Transformation towards Risk-Sensitive Urban Development: A Systematic Review of the Issues and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Michal Hrivnák & Peter Moritz & Katarína Melichová & Oľga Roháčiková & Lucia Pospišová, 2021. "Designing the Participation on Local Development Planning: From Literature Review to Adaptive Framework for Practice," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Löschner, Lukas & Nordbeck, Ralf & Scherhaufer, Patrick & Seher, Walter, 2016. "Scientist–stakeholder workshops: A collaborative approach for integrating science and decision-making in Austrian flood-prone municipalities," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(P2), pages 345-352.
    5. Abhas K. Jha & Todd W. Miner & Zuzana Stanton-Geddes, 2013. "Building Urban Resilience : Principles, Tools, and Practice," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13109.
    6. Dil B. Khatri & Andrea J. Nightingale & Hemant Ojha & Gyanu Maskey & Pema Norbu Lama ‘Tsumpa’, 2022. "Multi-scale politics in climate change: the mismatch of authority and capability in federalizing Nepal," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 1084-1096, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Uttama Barua & Mehedi Ahmed Ansary & Ishrat Islam & Hafiz Suliman Munawar & Mohammad Mojtahedi, 2023. "Multi-Criteria Earthquake Risk Sensitivity Mapping at the Local Level for Sustainable Risk-Sensitive Land Use Planning (RSLUP)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-24, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Upham, Dr Paul & Sovacool, Prof Benjamin & Ghosh, Dr Bipashyee, 2022. "Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: A framework for innovation, participation, and justice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Robert Osei-Kyei & Vivian W. Y. Tam & Ursa Komac & Godslove Ampratwum, 2023. "Review of the Relationship Management Strategies for Building Flood Disaster Resilience through Public–Private Partnership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Lu Liu & Yun Luo & Jingjing Pei & Huiquan Wang & Jixia Li & Ying Li, 2021. "Temporal and Spatial Differentiation in Urban Resilience and Its Influencing Factors in Henan Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Elisa Gavari-Starkie & María-Francisca Casado-Claro & Inmaculada Navarro-González, 2021. "The Japanese Educational System as an International Model for Urban Resilience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Nagamani Subramanian & M. Suresh, 2022. "Social Sustainability Factors Influencing the Implementation of Sustainable HRM in Manufacturing SMEs," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 469-507, December.
    6. Bipashyee Ghosh & Saurabh Arora, 2022. "Smart as (un)democratic? The making of a smart city imaginary in Kolkata, India," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 318-339, February.
    7. Fred Saunders & Michael Gilek & Anda Ikauniece & Ralph Voma Tafon & Kira Gee & Jacek Zaucha, 2020. "Theorizing Social Sustainability and Justice in Marine Spatial Planning: Democracy, Diversity, and Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Chenchen Shi & Naliang Guo & Xiaoping Zhu & Feng Wu, 2022. "Assessing Urban Resilience from the Perspective of Scaling Law: Evidence from Chinese Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
    9. Yoshiki Ogawa & Yoshihide Sekimoto & Ryosuke Shibasaki, 2021. "Estimation of earthquake damage to urban environments using sparse modeling," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1075-1090, June.
    10. Corinne Curt & Jean‐Marc Tacnet, 2018. "Resilience of Critical Infrastructures: Review and Analysis of Current Approaches," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2441-2458, November.
    11. Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Baležentis & Artiom Volkov & Mangirdas Morkūnas & Agnė Žičkienė & Justas Streimikis, 2021. "Barriers and Drivers of Renewable Energy Penetration in Rural Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    12. Chuan Wang & Xinhua Li & Siheng Li, 2021. "How Does the Concept of Resilient City Work in Practice? Planning and Achievements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Yu Chen & Mengke Zhu & Qian Zhou & Yurong Qiao, 2021. "Research on Spatiotemporal Differentiation and Influence Mechanism of Urban Resilience in China Based on MGWR Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-26, January.
    14. Chen Liu & Jia Liu, 2023. "Resilience of Living Streets in Small and Medium-Sized Towns: A Grounded Theory Study of Yixing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, August.
    15. Azam Ghezelbash & Jay Liu & Seyed Hamed Fahimifard & Vahid Khaligh, 2024. "Exploring the Influence of the Digital Economy on Energy, Economic, and Environmental Resilience: A Multinational Study across Varied Carbon Emission Groups," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, April.
    16. Kaiping Jiang & Kaichao Li & Nan Cong & Siyu Wu & Fei Peng, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Variation Characteristics and Obstacle Factors of Resilience in Border Cities of Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Muxi Yang & Guofang Zhai, 2024. "Measurement and Influencing Factors of Economic Resilience over a Long Duration of COVID-19: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Stelios Grafakos & Alberto Gianoli & Alexandra Tsatsou, 2016. "Towards the Development of an Integrated Sustainability and Resilience Benefits Assessment Framework of Urban Green Growth Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-33, May.
    19. Liang Wang & Jingye Li & Ligang Lv, 2023. "Urban Resilience and Its Links to City Size: Evidence from the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Md Shahab Uddin & Mokbul Morshed Ahmad & Pennung Warnitchai, 2018. "Surge dynamics of disaster displaced populations in temporary urban shelters: future challenges and management issues," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 94(1), pages 201-225, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14137-:d:957373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.