IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13625-d948987.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Forest Fire Mapping Using GIS-Based Data Mining Approaches in Western Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Osama Ashraf Mohammed

    (Department of Social Sciences, College of Basic Education, University of Halabja, Kurdistan Region, Halabja 46006, Iraq)

  • Sasan Vafaei

    (Government Employee of Natural Resources and Watershed Organization of Iran, Tehran 1955756113, Iran)

  • Mehdi Mirzaei Kurdalivand

    (Environmental Sciences-Environment Assessment, Islamic Azad University of Hamedan, Hamedan 413565174, Iran)

  • Sabri Rasooli

    (Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Guilan, Someh Sara 419961377, Iran)

  • Chaolong Yao

    (College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Tongxin Hu

    (Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management-Ministry of Education, College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, 26 Hexing Road, Harbin 150040, China)

Abstract

Mapping fire risk accurately is essential for the planning and protection of forests. This study aims to map fire risk (probability of ignition) in Marivan County of Kurdistan province, Iran, using the data mining approaches of the evidential belief function (EBF) and weight of evidence (WOE) models, with an emphasis placed on climatic variables. Firstly, 284 fire incidents in the region were randomly divided into two groups, including the training group (70%, 199 points) and the validation group (30%, 85 points). Given the previous studies and conditions of the region, the variables of slope percentage, slope direction, altitude, distance from rivers, distance from roads, distance from settlements, land use, slope curvature, rainfall, and maximum annual temperature were considered for zoning fire risk. Then, forest fire risk maps were prepared using the EBF and WOE models. The performance of each model was examined using the Relative Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. The results showed that WOE and EBF are effective tools for mapping forest fire risks in the study area. However, the WOE model shows a slightly higher Area Under the Curve value (0.896) compared to that of the EBF model (0.886), indicating a slightly better performance. The results of this study can provide valuable information for preventing forest fires in the study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Osama Ashraf Mohammed & Sasan Vafaei & Mehdi Mirzaei Kurdalivand & Sabri Rasooli & Chaolong Yao & Tongxin Hu, 2022. "A Comparative Study of Forest Fire Mapping Using GIS-Based Data Mining Approaches in Western Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13625-:d:948987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13625/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13625/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghafar Salavati & Ebrahim Saniei & Ebrahim Ghaderpour & Quazi K. Hassan, 2022. "Wildfire Risk Forecasting Using Weights of Evidence and Statistical Index Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Hamed Adab & Kasturi Kanniah & Karim Solaimani, 2013. "Modeling forest fire risk in the northeast of Iran using remote sensing and GIS techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(3), pages 1723-1743, February.
    3. Shruti Sachdeva & Tarunpreet Bhatia & A. K. Verma, 2018. "GIS-based evolutionary optimized Gradient Boosted Decision Trees for forest fire susceptibility mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1399-1418, July.
    4. Naderpour, Mohsen & Rizeei, Hossein Mojaddadi & Khakzad, Nima & Pradhan, Biswajeet, 2019. "Forest fire induced Natech risk assessment: A survey of geospatial technologies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghafar Salavati & Ebrahim Saniei & Ebrahim Ghaderpour & Quazi K. Hassan, 2022. "Wildfire Risk Forecasting Using Weights of Evidence and Statistical Index Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Sarkawt G. Salar & Arsalan Ahmed Othman & Sabri Rasooli & Salahalddin S. Ali & Zaid T. Al-Attar & Veraldo Liesenberg, 2022. "GIS-Based Modeling for Vegetated Land Fire Prediction in Qaradagh Area, Kurdistan Region, Iraq," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-31, May.
    3. Dingli Liu & Zhisheng Xu & Chuangang Fan, 2019. "Predictive analysis of fire frequency based on daily temperatures," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(3), pages 1175-1189, July.
    4. Saeedeh Eskandari & Mahdis Amiri & Nitheshnirmal Sãdhasivam & Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, 2020. "Comparison of new individual and hybrid machine learning algorithms for modeling and mapping fire hazard: a supplementary analysis of fire hazard in different counties of Golestan Province in Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 305-327, October.
    5. Ricci, Federica & Misuri, Alessio & Scarponi, Giordano Emrys & Cozzani, Valerio & Demichela, Micaela, 2024. "Vulnerability Assessment of Industrial Sites to Interface Fires and Wildfires," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    6. Naderpour, Mohsen & Rizeei, Hossein Mojaddadi & Khakzad, Nima & Pradhan, Biswajeet, 2019. "Forest fire induced Natech risk assessment: A survey of geospatial technologies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Hamed Adab, 2017. "Landfire hazard assessment in the Caspian Hyrcanian forest ecoregion with the long-term MODIS active fire data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(3), pages 1807-1825, July.
    8. Wang, Ning & Zhao, Shiyue & Wang, Sutong, 2024. "A novel clustering-based resampling with cost-sensitive boosting method to model and map wildfire susceptibility," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    9. Wang, Ning & Xu, Yan & Wang, Sutong, 2022. "Interpretable boosting tree ensemble method for multisource building fire loss prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    10. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    11. José Francisco de Oliveira-Júnior & Munawar Shah & Ayesha Abbas & Washington Luiz Félix Correia Filho & Carlos Antonio da Silva Junior & Dimas de Barros Santiago & Paulo Eduardo Teodoro & David Mendes, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Fire Foci and Environmental Degradation in the Biomes of Northeastern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Shruti Sachdeva & Tarunpreet Bhatia & A. K. Verma, 2018. "GIS-based evolutionary optimized Gradient Boosted Decision Trees for forest fire susceptibility mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1399-1418, July.
    13. Ebrahim Ghaderpour & Paolo Mazzanti & Francesca Bozzano & Gabriele Scarascia Mugnozza, 2024. "Trend Analysis of MODIS Land Surface Temperature and Land Cover in Central Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, June.
    14. Olimpia Smaranda Mintaș & Daniel Mierliță & Octavian Berchez & Alina Stanciu & Alina Osiceanu & Adrian Gheorghe Osiceanu, 2022. "Analysis of the Sustainability of Livestock Farms in the Area of the Southwest of Bihor County to Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-32, July.
    15. José Manuel Zúñiga-Vásquez & Marín Pompa-García, 2019. "The occurrence of forest fires in Mexico presents an altitudinal tendency: a geospatial analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(1), pages 213-224, March.
    16. Mohamad Khoirun Najib & Sri Nurdiati & Ardhasena Sopaheluwakan, 2022. "Multivariate fire risk models using copula regression in Kalimantan, Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(2), pages 1263-1283, September.
    17. Caratozzolo, Vincenzo & Misuri, Alessio & Cozzani, Valerio, 2022. "A generalized equipment vulnerability model for the quantitative risk assessment of horizontal vessels involved in Natech scenarios triggered by floods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    18. Hamed Adab & Kasturi Devi Kanniah & Karim Solaimani, 2021. "Remote sensing-based operational modeling of fuel ignitability in Hyrcanian mixed forest, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 253-283, August.
    19. Wenjuan Sun & Paolo Bocchini & Brian D. Davison, 2020. "Applications of artificial intelligence for disaster management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 2631-2689, September.
    20. Gianluigi Busico & Elisabetta Giuditta & Nerantzis Kazakis & Nicolò Colombani, 2019. "A Hybrid GIS and AHP Approach for Modelling Actual and Future Forest Fire Risk Under Climate Change Accounting Water Resources Attenuation Role," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13625-:d:948987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.