IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12059-d923597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Local Government’s Attention Allocated to Green Innovation Improve the Green Innovation Efficiency?—Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Mengzhi Xu

    (School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Jixia Li

    (School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Zeyu Ping

    (School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Qianming Zhang

    (School of Management and Economics, Chuxiong Normal University, Chuxiong 675000, China)

  • Tengfei Liu

    (School of Business Administration, The Open University of China, Beijing 100039, China)

  • Can Zhang

    (School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Huachun Wang

    (School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

Green innovation is an important way to integrate China’s innovation-driven strategy with sustainable development strategy. Adopting the attention-based view in policy implementation analysis, this paper constructs an analytical framework of how the local government’s attention paid to green innovation (LGA-GI) affects green innovation efficiency (GIE). Using the panel data of 30 provincial administrative regions in China from 2009 to 2020, we describe the temporal and spatial characteristics of LGA-GI, empirically test the impact of LGA-GI on GIE through two-way fixed effects models, and then compare the effects in the three stages of green innovation. The major findings are as follows: (1) the LGA-GI in China from 2009 to 2020 shows an upward trend with mild fluctuations, and peaks three times in 2012, 2016, and 2018. The spatial distribution of LGA-GI has changed from a pattern of “low in the middle” (low LGA-GI in the central region) to “continuous highs with scattered lows”. (2) LGA-GI has a significant positive effect on the overall GIE, but the effect is concentrated in the stage of knowledge absorption and commercialization, rather than in the stage of knowledge innovation. The implication of these results is that local governments need to allocate more attention to green innovation and maintain its continuity, and governments at all levels should distribute policy implementation resources based on the characteristics of different green innovation stages.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengzhi Xu & Jixia Li & Zeyu Ping & Qianming Zhang & Tengfei Liu & Can Zhang & Huachun Wang, 2022. "Can Local Government’s Attention Allocated to Green Innovation Improve the Green Innovation Efficiency?—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12059-:d:923597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12059/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12059/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He, Lerong & Huang, Liying & Yang, Guangqing, 2021. "Invest in Innovation or Not? How Managerial Cognition and Attention Allocation Shape Corporate Responses to Performance Shortfalls," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(4), pages 815-850, October.
    2. Miguel Angel Esquivias & Lilik Sugiharti & Hilda Rohmawati & Omar Rojas & Narayan Sethi, 2022. "Nexus between Technological Innovation, Renewable Energy, and Human Capital on the Environmental Sustainability in Emerging Asian Economies: A Panel Quantile Regression Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Ha, Yoo Jung, 2021. "Attention green aliens? Activities of multinational enterprises in host countries and eco-innovation diffusion," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 32-43.
    4. Li, Xing & Hu, Zhigao & Cao, Jianhua & Xu, Xing, 2022. "The impact of environmental accountability on air pollution: A public attention perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Bai, Xue-Jie & Li, Zhen-Yang & Zeng, Jin, 2020. "Performance evaluation of China's innovation during the industry-university-research collaboration process—an analysis basis on the dynamic network slacks-based measurement model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    6. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel & Bart Clarysse, 2015. "Attention allocation to multiple goals: The case of for-profit social enterprises," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(7), pages 1006-1016, July.
    7. Shan Huang & Yan Ding & Pierre Failler, 2022. "Does the Government’s Environmental Attention Affect Ambient Pollution? Empirical Research on Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Kneller, Richard & Manderson, Edward, 2012. "Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 211-235.
    9. Tone, Kaoru, 2001. "A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 498-509, May.
    10. Brad R. Taylor, 2017. "The Lack of Competition in Governance as an Impediment to Regional Development in Australia," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 21-30.
    11. William Ocasio, 1997. "Towards An Attention‐Based View Of The Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(S1), pages 187-206, July.
    12. Gerard Breeman & Peter Scholten & Arco Timmermans, 2015. "Analysing Local Policy Agendas: How Dutch Municipal Executive Coalitions Allocate Attention," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 20-43, January.
    13. Frank R. Baumgartner & Christian Breunig & Christoffer Green‐Pedersen & Bryan D. Jones & Peter B. Mortensen & Michiel Nuytemans & Stefaan Walgrave, 2009. "Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(3), pages 603-620, July.
    14. Kevin M. Quinn & Burt L. Monroe & Michael Colaresi & Michael H. Crespin & Dragomir R. Radev, 2010. "How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 209-228, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vijay Prakash Sharma & Surya Prakash & Ranbir Singh, 2022. "What Prevents Sustainable Last-Mile Delivery in Industry 4.0? An Analysis and Decision Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Liu, Xiaoqian & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier & Zhao, Shikuan & Wang, Long, 2023. "Government environmental attention and carbon emissions governance: Firm-level evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 121-142.
    3. Liu, Xiaoqian & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier & Zhao, Shikuan & Wang, Long, 2024. "The impact of government environmental attention on firms’ ESG performance: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Hui & Qi, Shaozhou & Chen, Yuanzhi, 2023. "Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Lorenzo Ardito, 2023. "The influence of firm digitalization on sustainable innovation performance and the moderating role of corporate sustainability practices: An empirical investigation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5252-5272, December.
    3. María-Celia López-Penabad & José Manuel Maside-Sanfiz & Juan Torrelles-Manent & Carmen López-Andión, 2021. "Performance Evaluation of Sheltered Workshops. Does Legal Status Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Zhe Zhang & Xin Wang & Ming Jia, 2021. "Echoes of CEO Entrepreneurial Orientation: How and When CEO Entrepreneurial Orientation Influences Dual CSR Activities," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(4), pages 609-629, April.
    5. Zhang, Yaxin & Zeng, Shibo & Wu, Qiaosheng & Fu, Junyi & Li, Tongping, 2023. "A study on the impact of the carbon emissions trading policy on the mining industry based on Porter hypothesis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    6. Jingbei Wang & Yafei Nie & Min Guo & Hui Liu, 2024. "Performance feedback as a determinant of ego-network stability in collaboration networks," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 789-821, June.
    7. Theodor Vladasel & Simon C. Parker & Randolph Sloof & Mirjam van Praag, 2024. "Revenue drift, incentives, and effort allocation in social enterprises," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 630-651, August.
    8. Shinkle, George A. & Hodgkinson, Gerard P. & Gary, Michael Shayne, 2021. "Government policy changes and organizational goal setting: Extensions to the behavioral theory of the firm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 406-417.
    9. Liu, Xiaoqian & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier & Zhao, Shikuan & Wang, Long, 2023. "Government environmental attention and carbon emissions governance: Firm-level evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 121-142.
    10. Tohyun Kim & Daegyu Yang, 2020. "Multiple Goals, Attention Allocation, and the Intention-Achievement Gap in Energy Efficiency Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    11. Fengyu Wang & Mi Zhou & Huansheng Yu, 2024. "Is More Always Better? Government Attention and Environmental Governance Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Shihao Wei & Christopher J. Boudreaux & Zhongfeng Su & Zhan Wu, 2024. "Natural disasters, personal attributes, and social entrepreneurship: an attention-based view," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1409-1427, April.
    13. Mintao Nie, 2023. "IOs’ selective adoption of NGO information: Evidence from the Universal Periodic Review," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 27-59, January.
    14. Chia-Chin Chang, 2015. "Influences of knowledge spillover and utilization on the NIS performance: a multi-stage efficiency perspective," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(5), pages 1945-1967, September.
    15. Vivienne Born & Lee Warren Brown & Dinesh Hasija, 2024. "Who obtains political exemptions? An attention-based analysis of steel tariff exclusion requests," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(2), pages 166-180, June.
    16. Luca Berchicci & Murat Tarakci, 2022. "Aspiration formation and attention rules," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(8), pages 1575-1601, August.
    17. Srivastava, Smita & Sahaym, Arvin & Allison, Thomas H., 2021. "Alert and Awake: Role of alertness and attention on rate of new product introductions," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(4).
    18. Jing Sun & Jienan Hu & Hongmei Wang & Yinfeng Shi & Ziru Wei & Tangzhe Cao, 2023. "The Government’s Environmental Attention and the Sustainability of Environmental Protection Expenditure: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-12, July.
    19. Wang, Xincheng & Li, Yuan & Tian, Longwei & Hou, Ye, 2023. "Government digital initiatives and firm digital innovation: Evidence from China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Xu Dong & Wensi Fu & Yali Yang & Chenguang Liu & Guizhi Xue, 2022. "Study on the Evaluation of Green Technology Innovation Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors in the Central Plains City Cluster of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12059-:d:923597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.