IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v17y2021i4p815-850_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Invest in Innovation or Not? How Managerial Cognition and Attention Allocation Shape Corporate Responses to Performance Shortfalls

Author

Listed:
  • He, Lerong
  • Huang, Liying
  • Yang, Guangqing

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of managerial cognition and attention allocation on firms’ responses to negative performance feedback. We explore how managerial cognition, as shaped by managers’ experiences, connections, positions, and industry environments, affects underperforming firms’ attention allocation and, consequently, their decisions to invest in innovation. Utilizing a longitudinal sample of Chinese high-tech firms from 2009 to 2017, we find that firms increase investment in research and development (R&D) when performance falls below aspiration levels. We also document that underperforming firms are associated with an even larger R&D investment increase when their CEOs have an R&D or engineering background, serve simultaneously as the board chair, or are not politically connected. In addition, we highlight the moderating effects of industry competition and industry norms on the relationship between firm underperformance and R&D intensity. We conclude that managerial cognition affects firms’ allocation of attention to innovation as a solution for closing performance gaps and shapes corporate responses to negative performance feedback. 本文研究高管认知与注意力分配对企业面临负面绩效反馈时所采取的反应。具体而言,本文探讨了高管的认知能力—由其经历、关系、职位和行业环境所塑造的-- 对绩效下滑企业的管理者注意力分配以及企业创新投资行为的影响。作者对2009年至2017年期间在深圳创业板上市的高新技术企业数据进行了分析,发现当业绩低于期望水平时,企业会增加研发投入。而且,创新研发投入在CEO本人兼任董事长、有工程或研发背景、或者没有政治联系时,幅度更大。此外,行业竞争强度以及行业研发投入强度对企业在业绩下滑时的研发投入也具有调节作用。总而言之,高管认知会直接影响企业是否把注意力放在创新上作为应对企业业绩下滑的解决方法。

Suggested Citation

  • He, Lerong & Huang, Liying & Yang, Guangqing, 2021. "Invest in Innovation or Not? How Managerial Cognition and Attention Allocation Shape Corporate Responses to Performance Shortfalls," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 17(4), pages 815-850, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:17:y:2021:i:4:p:815-850_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877621000589/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Liangyong & Liu, Yu & Hu, Sanman & Zhang, Sai, 2022. "Perception of organizational politics and innovative behavior in the workplace: The roles of knowledge-sharing hostility and mindfulness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 268-276.
    2. Marco Cucculelli & Riccardo Cappelli & Jasmine Mondolo, 2024. "Does market power drive business model innovation? Evidence from Italian family manufacturing firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 447-475, June.
    3. Jingbei Wang & Yafei Nie & Min Guo & Hui Liu, 2024. "Performance feedback as a determinant of ego-network stability in collaboration networks," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 789-821, June.
    4. Mengzhi Xu & Jixia Li & Zeyu Ping & Qianming Zhang & Tengfei Liu & Can Zhang & Huachun Wang, 2022. "Can Local Government’s Attention Allocated to Green Innovation Improve the Green Innovation Efficiency?—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:17:y:2021:i:4:p:815-850_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.