IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11577-d915768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing the Sustainable Multimodal Freight Transport and Logistics System Based on the Genetic Algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Okyere

    (Procurement and Supply Chain Management Department, Kumasi Technical University, Kumasi P.O. Box 854, Ghana
    School of Transport and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Heping Ave. 1178, Wuhan 430063, China
    Africa Centre of Excellence, Regional Transport Research and Education Centre, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi PMB, Ghana)

  • Jiaqi Yang

    (School of Transport and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Heping Ave. 1178, Wuhan 430063, China)

  • Charles Anum Adams

    (Africa Centre of Excellence, Regional Transport Research and Education Centre, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi PMB, Ghana)

Abstract

Contrasted with the unimodal road mode, multimodal transport is potentially more feasible as it saves cost and lower environmental effect. This paper investigates freight transport and logistics framework to advance sustainable multimodal freight delivery involving road, rail, and waterway in an inland transportation. We consider a genetic algorithm model comprising time, distance, and CO 2 emissions. The optimal design system is modeled by adapting Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Matlab (R2016a) software to improve the existing transport split modes with high shipment cost. An optimal model is formulated to integrate the existing modes to mitigate the prevailing economic, social, and environmental issues. A case investigation of 10 regional capitals in Ghana where freights are transported to and from the main national port was useful to formulate and model an optimized sustainable multimodal freight transport and logistics system (SMFTLS). The Matlab software was used to solve containerized cargo shipment in the optimal system and compare it with the previous system. It was realized that the total cost savings achieved from the optimized system was USD 97.03 million (i.e., 4.5%) lower than the same cargo quantity shipped with the existing system. This SMFTLS model will assist governments, policy makers and investors in deciding the appropriate transport schemes that would manage their overall effects. The study recommends the development of rail and waterway infrastructures to help build the resilient sustainable system (SMFTLS) to manage the rising freight transport demands and related economic, social, and environmental issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Okyere & Jiaqi Yang & Charles Anum Adams, 2022. "Optimizing the Sustainable Multimodal Freight Transport and Logistics System Based on the Genetic Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11577-:d:915768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11577/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11577/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Belle, Jan & Valckenaers, Paul & Cattrysse, Dirk, 2012. "Cross-docking: State of the art," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 827-846.
    2. Magdalena I. Asborno & Sarah Hernandez & Manzi Yves, 2021. "GIS-based identification and visualization of multimodal freight transportation catchment areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 2939-2968, December.
    3. Larranaga, Ana Margarita & Arellana, Julian & Senna, Luiz Afonso, 2017. "Encouraging intermodality: A stated preference analysis of freight mode choice in Rio Grande do Sul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 202-211.
    4. Joseph Chow & Choon Yang & Amelia Regan, 2010. "State-of-the art of freight forecast modeling: lessons learned and the road ahead," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 1011-1030, November.
    5. Zhang, M. & Janic, M. & Tavasszy, L.A., 2015. "A freight transport optimization model for integrated network, service, and policy design," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 61-76.
    6. Antonio Comi & Antonio Polimeni, 2020. "Assessing the Potential of Short Sea Shipping and the Benefits in Terms of External Costs: Application to the Mediterranean Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Tsamboulas, Dimitrios & Vrenken, Huub & Lekka, Anna-Maria, 2007. "Assessment of a transport policy potential for intermodal mode shift on a European scale," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 715-733, October.
    8. Latifah M. Alsarhan & Alhanouf S. Alayyar & Naif B. Alqahtani & Nezar H. Khdary, 2021. "Circular Carbon Economy (CCE): A Way to Invest CO 2 and Protect the Environment, a Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, October.
    9. Christine Tawfik & Sabine Limbourg, 2018. "Pricing Problems in Intermodal Freight Transport: Research Overview and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Behrends, Sönke, 2017. "Burden or opportunity for modal shift? – Embracing the urban dimension of intermodal road-rail transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 10-16.
    11. Fan, Lei & Wilson, William W. & Tolliver, Denver, 2010. "Optimal network flows for containerized imports to the United States," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 735-749, September.
    12. SteadieSeifi, M. & Dellaert, N.P. & Nuijten, W. & Van Woensel, T. & Raoufi, R., 2014. "Multimodal freight transportation planning: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 1-15.
    13. Hu, Qiaolin & Gu, Weihua & Wang, Shuaian, 2022. "Optimal subsidy scheme design for promoting intermodal freight transport," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Fang & Chen, Ting-Yu, 2023. "A hybrid group decision-making approach involving Pythagorean fuzzy uncertainty for green supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    2. Martina Jakara & Nikolina Brnjac, 2023. "Foliated Transport Networks in Intermodal Freight Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Shuyue Peng & Qinming Liu & Jiarui Hu, 2023. "Green Distribution Route Optimization of Medical Relief Supplies Based on Improved NSGA-II Algorithm under Dual-Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Imane Tronnebati & Manal El Yadari & Fouad Jawab, 2022. "A Review of Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection Issues Using MCDM, MP and AI Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Damian Bonk & Sylwia Kowalska, 2020. "Modal Choice Preferences in Inland Container Transport in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 99-109.
    2. Masone, Adriano & Marzano, Vittorio & Simonelli, Fulvio & Sterle, Claudio, 2024. "Exact and heuristic approaches for the Modal Shift Incentive Problem," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Hu, Qiaolin & Gu, Weihua & Wang, Shuaian, 2022. "Optimal subsidy scheme design for promoting intermodal freight transport," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Tamannaei, Mohammad & Zarei, Hamid & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2021. "A game theoretic approach to sustainable freight transportation: Competition between road and intermodal road–rail systems with government intervention," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 272-295.
    5. Qian Dai & Jiaqi Yang & Dong Li, 2018. "Modeling a Three-Mode Hybrid Port-Hinterland Freight Intermodal Distribution Network with Environmental Consideration: The Case of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, August.
    6. Vanajakumari, Manoj & Sun, Haoying & Jones, Ashley & Sriskandarajah, Chelliah, 2022. "Supply chain planning: A case for Hybrid Cross-Docks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Jiang, Xiaodan & Fan, Houming & Luo, Meifeng & Xu, Zhenlin, 2020. "Strategic port competition in multimodal network development considering shippers’ choice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 68-89.
    8. Edward Kim, M. & Schonfeld, Paul & Roche, Austin & Raleigh, Chelsie, 2022. "Optimal service zones and frequencies for flexible-route freight deliveries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 182-199.
    9. Gohari, Adel & Ahmad, Anuar Bin & Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard & Gohari, Ali & Hasan, Razi & Sholagberu, Abdulkadir Taofeeq, 2022. "Significance of intermodal freight modal choice criteria: MCDM-based decision support models and SP-based modal shift policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 46-60.
    10. Reis, Vasco, 2014. "Analysis of mode choice variables in short-distance intermodal freight transport using an agent-based model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 100-120.
    11. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    12. Bart Van Riessen & Judith Mulder & Rudy R. Negenborn & Rommert Dekker, 2021. "Revenue management with two fare classes in synchromodal container transportation," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 623-662, September.
    13. Bouchery, Yann & Woxenius, Johan & Fransoo, Jan C., 2020. "Identifying the market areas of port-centric logistics and hinterland intermodal transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 599-611.
    14. Kalahasthi, Lokesh & Holguín-Veras, José & Yushimito, Wilfredo F., 2022. "A freight origin-destination synthesis model with mode choice," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    15. Kurtuluş, Ercan & Çetin, İsmail Bilge, 2020. "Analysis of modal shift potential towards intermodal transportation in short-distance inland container transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 24-37.
    16. Francesco Corman & Francesco Viti & Rudy R. Negenborn, 2017. "Equilibrium models in multimodal container transport systems," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 125-153, March.
    17. Rodrigo J. Tapia & Gerard Jong & Ana M. Larranaga & Helena B. Bettella Cybis, 2021. "Exploring Multiple‐discreteness in Freight Transport. A Multiple Discrete Extreme Value Model Application for Grain Consolidators in Argentina," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 581-608, September.
    18. Joris Wagenaar & Ioannis Fragkos & Rob Zuidwijk, 2021. "Integrated Planning for Multimodal Networks with Disruptions and Customer Service Requirements," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 196-221, 1-2.
    19. Kelle, Peter & Song, Jinglu & Jin, Mingzhou & Schneider, Helmut & Claypool, Christopher, 2019. "Evaluation of operational and environmental sustainability tradeoffs in multimodal freight transportation planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 411-420.
    20. Kumar, Aalok & Anbanandam, Ramesh, 2020. "Evaluating the interrelationships among inhibitors to intermodal railroad freight transport in emerging economies: A multi-stakeholder perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 559-581.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11577-:d:915768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.