IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11491-d914158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Method of Trajectory Selection Based on Bayesian Game Model

Author

Listed:
  • Wen Tian

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

  • Qin Fang

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

  • Xuefang Zhou

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

  • Fan Yang

    (AVIC Leihua Electronic Technology Research Institute, Wuxi 214063, China)

Abstract

To cope with the problem that most of the en-route spatial-temporal resource allocation in the collaborative trajectory options program (CTOP) only considers the air traffic control system command center (ATCSCC) while ignoring the needs of the airlines, which results in the loss of fairness, this study explores resource allocation methods oriented to airline trajectory preferences with optional trajectory and entry slots of flights over the flow constrained area (FCA) as the research object. Using game theory to analyze airline trajectory preference information and a Bayesian game model based on mixed strategies is constructed, the process of incomplete information game among airlines is studied. The equilibrium theory is used to solve the guarantee strategy of airline trajectory selection, which makes the airline trajectory selection strategy robust and provides a basis for the selection of schemes for ATCSCC to implement en-route network resource allocation under the CTOP. Experimental analysis was carried out to verify the feasibility of the method based on the actual operation data of high-altitude sectors of Shanghai. The results show that the solution obtained by the game can provide airlines with flight trajectory and entry slots over the FCA that are more in line with their actual operational needs and which provide data reference for the ATCSCC to select the final plan in multiple global Pareto optimal solutions in the subsequent process of the CTOP so as to better play the decision-making role of airlines in the CTOP while improving the fairness of en-route resource allocation.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen Tian & Qin Fang & Xuefang Zhou & Fan Yang, 2022. "The Method of Trajectory Selection Based on Bayesian Game Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11491-:d:914158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11491/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11491/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harborne W. Stuart Jr. & Hong Hu, 2002. "An epistemic analysis of the Harsanyi transformation," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 30(4), pages 517-525.
    2. Lining Liu & Xiaofei Ye & Tao Wang & Xingchen Yan & Jun Chen & Bin Ran, 2022. "Key Factors Analysis of Severity of Automobile to Two-Wheeler Traffic Accidents Based on Bayesian Network," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Xu, Yan & Dalmau, Ramon & Melgosa, Marc & Montlaur, Adeline & Prats, Xavier, 2020. "A framework for collaborative air traffic flow management minimizing costs for airspace users: Enabling trajectory options and flexible pre-tactical delay management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 229-255.
    4. Kim, Amy & Hansen, Mark, 2015. "Some insights into a sequential resource allocation mechanism for en route air traffic management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Meier & Burkhard Schipper, 2014. "Bayesian games with unawareness and unawareness perfection," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 56(2), pages 219-249, June.
    2. Luis Delgado & G'erald Gurtner & Tatjana Boli'c & Lorenzo Castelli, 2021. "Estimating economic severity of Air Traffic Flow Management regulations," Papers 2112.11263, arXiv.org.
    3. Martin Meier & Burkhard Schipper, 2014. "Bayesian games with unawareness and unawareness perfection," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 56(2), pages 219-249, June.
    4. Chen, Yunxiang & Zhao, Yifei & Wu, Yexin, 2024. "Recent progress in air traffic flow management: A review," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    5. Künnen, Jan-Rasmus & Strauss, Arne K., 2022. "The value of flexible flight-to-route assignments in pre-tactical air traffic management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 76-96.
    6. Ye, Qing Chuan & Zhang, Yingqian & Dekker, Rommert, 2017. "Fair task allocation in transportation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-16.
    7. Silvia Zaoli & Giovanni Scaini & Lorenzo Castelli, 2021. "Community Detection for Air Traffic Networks and Its Application in Strategic Flight Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Yi Yang & Shangwen Yang & Ming Tong & Ying Xu, 2023. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: A novel dynamic en-route and slot allocation method based on receding horizon control," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Bolić, Tatjana & Castelli, Lorenzo & Corolli, Luca & Scaini, Giovanni, 2021. "Flexibility in strategic flight planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Heifetz, Aviad & Meier, Martin & Schipper, Burkhard C., 2013. "Unawareness, beliefs, and speculative trade," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 100-121.
    11. Heifetz, Aviad & Meier, Martin & Schipper, Burkhard C., 2013. "Unawareness, beliefs, and speculative trade," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 100-121.
    12. Ziyu Chen & Xiufeng Chen & Ruicong Wang & Mengyuan Gao, 2022. "Characterization of Pedestrian Crossing Spatial Violations and Safety Impact Analysis in Advance Right-Turn Lane," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Adam Brandenburger, 2007. "The power of paradox: some recent developments in interactive epistemology," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 35(4), pages 465-492, April.
    14. Yong Tian & Bojia Ye & Marc Sáez Estupiñá & Lili Wan, 2018. "Stochastic Simulation Optimization for Route Selection Strategy Based on Flight Delay Cost," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(06), pages 1-24, December.
    15. Xu, Yan & Dalmau, Ramon & Melgosa, Marc & Montlaur, Adeline & Prats, Xavier, 2020. "A framework for collaborative air traffic flow management minimizing costs for airspace users: Enabling trajectory options and flexible pre-tactical delay management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 229-255.
    16. Bahel, Eric & Haller, Hans, 2013. "Cycles with undistinguished actions and extended Rock–Paper–Scissors games," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 588-591.
    17. Zhang, Qiuhan & Le, Meilong & Xu, Yan, 2021. "Collaborative delay management towards demand-capacity balancing within User Driven Prioritisation Process," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Dalmau, Ramon & Gawinowski, Gilles & Anoraud, Camille, 2022. "Comparison of various temporal air traffic flow management models in critical scenarios," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    19. Yasuo Sasaki, 2016. "An Equivalence Result on the Reduction of Games with Unawareness," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-27, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11491-:d:914158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.