IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/apjorx/v35y2018i06ns0217595918500458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stochastic Simulation Optimization for Route Selection Strategy Based on Flight Delay Cost

Author

Listed:
  • Yong Tian

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, P. R. China2National Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Flow Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, P. R. China)

  • Bojia Ye

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, P. R. China2National Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Flow Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, P. R. China)

  • Marc Sáez Estupiñá

    (The School of Industrial, Aerospace and Audiovisual Engineering of Terrassa, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Terrassa, Barcelona 08222, Spain)

  • Lili Wan

    (College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, P. R. China2National Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Flow Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211100, P. R. China)

Abstract

The continuous and strong growth of the civil aviation in the world combined with the severe adverse weather problem have made necessary the collaboration between the different civil aviation agents to improve the management of the capacity-demand imbalances in the airspace. In this paper, we consider a stochastic simulation optimization problem for air route selection strategy based on flight delay cost. The problem takes consideration of airspace capacity and demand uncertainty, three strategies, including collaborative reroute strategy (CRS), full information reroute strategy (FIRS) and hybrid stated route preference strategy (HSR), are employed to mitigate the flight delay cost. To find the best strategy, a discrete event simulation model is built by Arena Software, and the Monte Carlo method combined with the OCBA simulation optimization technique is employed for assessing a common severe convective weather scenario in the Central and Southern China airspace. Simulation results imply that HSR schemes show better system-wide performance than CRS and FIRS, these benefits are supposed to come from the batch allocations method. Although the airline can receive full information in advance, FIRS does not show obvious advantage in reducing the total airborne waiting time than CRS. For the system-wide performance FIRS is better than CRS, but not as good as HSR.

Suggested Citation

  • Yong Tian & Bojia Ye & Marc Sáez Estupiñá & Lili Wan, 2018. "Stochastic Simulation Optimization for Route Selection Strategy Based on Flight Delay Cost," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(06), pages 1-24, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:apjorx:v:35:y:2018:i:06:n:s0217595918500458
    DOI: 10.1142/S0217595918500458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217595918500458
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0217595918500458?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bertsimas, Dimitris & Gupta, Shubham & Lulli, Guglielmo, 2014. "Dynamic resource allocation: A flexible and tractable modeling framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 14-26.
    2. Ivanov, Nikola & Netjasov, Fedja & Jovanović, Radosav & Starita, Stefano & Strauss, Arne, 2017. "Air Traffic Flow Management slot allocation to minimize propagated delay and improve airport slot adherence," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 183-197.
    3. Mukherjee, Avijit & Hansen, Mark, 2009. "A dynamic rerouting model for air traffic flow management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 159-171, January.
    4. Kim, Amy & Hansen, Mark, 2015. "Some insights into a sequential resource allocation mechanism for en route air traffic management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-15.
    5. Balázs Kotnyek & Octavio Richetta, 2006. "Equitable Models for the Stochastic Ground-Holding Problem Under Collaborative Decision Making," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 133-146, May.
    6. Sibdari, Soheil & Mohammadian, Iman & Pyke, David F., 2018. "On the impact of jet fuel cost on airlines’ capacity choice: Evidence from the U.S. domestic markets," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1-17.
    7. Hanif D. Sherali & Justin M. Hill & Michael V. McCrea & Antonio A. Trani, 2011. "Integrating Slot Exchange, Safety, Capacity, and Equity Mechanisms Within an Airspace Flow Program," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 271-284, May.
    8. Jie Xu & Edward Huang & Chun-Hung Chen & Loo Hay Lee, 2015. "Simulation Optimization: A Review and Exploration in the New Era of Cloud Computing and Big Data," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 32(03), pages 1-34.
    9. Chun-Hung Chen & Donghai He & Michael Fu & Loo Hay Lee, 2008. "Efficient Simulation Budget Allocation for Selecting an Optimal Subset," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 579-595, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2015. "Inequity averse optimization in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 343-359.
    2. Li, Max Z. & Ryerson, Megan S., 2019. "Reviewing the DATAS of aviation research data: Diversity, availability, tractability, applicability, and sources," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 111-130.
    3. Xu, Yan & Dalmau, Ramon & Melgosa, Marc & Montlaur, Adeline & Prats, Xavier, 2020. "A framework for collaborative air traffic flow management minimizing costs for airspace users: Enabling trajectory options and flexible pre-tactical delay management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 229-255.
    4. Yi Yang & Shangwen Yang & Ming Tong & Ying Xu, 2023. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: A novel dynamic en-route and slot allocation method based on receding horizon control," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Siyang Gao & Weiwei Chen & Leyuan Shi, 2017. "A New Budget Allocation Framework for the Expected Opportunity Cost," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 787-803, June.
    6. Samà, Marcella & D’Ariano, Andrea & D’Ariano, Paolo & Pacciarelli, Dario, 2017. "Scheduling models for optimal aircraft traffic control at busy airports: Tardiness, priorities, equity and violations considerations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 81-98.
    7. Shen, Ching-Cheng & Yeh, Chien-Chi & Lin, Chun-Nan, 2022. "Using the perspective of business information technology technicians to explore how information technology affects business competitive advantage," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Donghai Wang & Qiuhong Zhao, 2020. "A Simultaneous Optimization Model for Airport Network Slot Allocation under Uncertain Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Linlin Chen & Shuihua Han & Chaokan Du & Zongwei Luo, 2022. "A real-time integrated optimization of the aircraft holding time and rerouting under risk area," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 7-26, March.
    10. Seebacher, Gottfried & Winkler, Herwig, 2014. "Evaluating flexibility in discrete manufacturing based on performance and efficiency," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 340-351.
    11. Murça, Mayara Condé Rocha, 2018. "Collaborative air traffic flow management: Incorporating airline preferences in rerouting decisions," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 97-107.
    12. Shuang Xiao & Guo Li & Yunjing Jia, 2017. "Estimating the Constant Elasticity of Variance Model with Data-Driven Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(01), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Argyris, Nikolaos & Karsu, Özlem & Yavuz, Mirel, 2022. "Fair resource allocation: Using welfare-based dominance constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 560-578.
    14. Luis Delgado & G'erald Gurtner & Tatjana Boli'c & Lorenzo Castelli, 2021. "Estimating economic severity of Air Traffic Flow Management regulations," Papers 2112.11263, arXiv.org.
    15. Andreatta, Giovanni & Dell'Olmo, Paolo & Lulli, Guglielmo, 2011. "An aggregate stochastic programming model for air traffic flow management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 215(3), pages 697-704, December.
    16. Mohammad H. Almomani & Mahmoud H. Alrefaei, 2016. "Ordinal Optimization with Computing Budget Allocation for Selecting an Optimal Subset," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(02), pages 1-17, April.
    17. Kim, Amy & Hansen, Mark, 2013. "Deconstructing delay: A non-parametric approach to analyzing delay changes in single server queuing systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 119-133.
    18. Pedro Jose Gudiel Pineda & Chao-Che Hsu & James J. H. Liou & Huai-Wei Lo, 2018. "A Hybrid Model for Aircraft Type Determination Following Flight Cancellation," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1147-1172, July.
    19. Jiajun Xu & Suvrajeet Sen, 2024. "Ensemble Variance Reduction Methods for Stochastic Mixed-Integer Programming and their Application to the Stochastic Facility Location Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 587-599, March.
    20. Yi Liu & Mark Hansen, 2016. "Incorporating Predictability Into Cost Optimization for Ground Delay Programs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 132-149, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:apjorx:v:35:y:2018:i:06:n:s0217595918500458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/apjor/apjor.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.