IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v9y2021i6p113-d570813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Identification, Evaluation and Treatment of Risks in Smart Homes: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Raphael Iten

    (Institute for Risk & Insurance, ZHAW School of Management and Law, Technoparkstrasse 2, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
    Department of Actuarial Science, Faculty of Business and Economics (HEC), University of Lausanne, Extranef, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Joël Wagner

    (Department of Actuarial Science, Faculty of Business and Economics (HEC), University of Lausanne, Extranef, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
    Swiss Finance Institute, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Angela Zeier Röschmann

    (Institute for Risk & Insurance, ZHAW School of Management and Law, Technoparkstrasse 2, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

The emergence of smart technologies in homes comes with various services and functions for everyday life. While a smart home (SH) is associated with great potential in terms of comfort and risk treatment, it also introduces new and alters existing risks. Despite a growing number of academic studies on SH risks, research is fragmented with regard to its focus on certain disciplines and is still rather technology-focused. In this paper, we fill this gap by providing a comprehensive understanding of relevant risks through a systematic literature review. Following the guidelines of the PRISMA reporting protocol, we search 1196 academic and practitioners’ publications related to household risks or risk perceptions of SH users. A final set of 59 records results in three main themes. They include (1) a synthesis of pre-existing and emerging risks sketching the new risk landscape of SH households, (2) a discussion of the prevailing risk evaluation methods, and (3) a presentation of SH-related risk treatment options with a particular emphasis on insurance. We specify the influence of SH on risks and risk perception, and highlight the relevance of analyzing the interconnection of risks in complex systems, such as SH. Our review lays the basis for assessing SH risks and for enabling more comprehensive and effective risk management optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphael Iten & Joël Wagner & Angela Zeier Röschmann, 2021. "On the Identification, Evaluation and Treatment of Risks in Smart Homes: A Systematic Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-30, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:6:p:113-:d:570813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/6/113/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/6/113/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hans-Martin von Gaudecker & Radost Holler & Lena Janys & Bettina Siflinger & Christian Zimpelmann, 2020. "Labour supply in the early stages of the CoViD-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence on hours, home office, and expectations," ECONtribute Policy Brief Series 005, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    2. Andrew Clark & Jessica Smith & Carole Conroy, 2015. "Domestic fire risk: a narrative review of social science literature and implications for further research," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(9), pages 1113-1129, October.
    3. Pechon, Florian & Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien, 2021. "Home and Motor insurance joined at a household level using multivariate credibility," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 82-114, March.
    4. Chabane Mazri, 2017. "(Re) Defining Emerging Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(11), pages 2053-2065, November.
    5. Marikyan, Davit & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Alamanos, Eleftherios, 2019. "A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 139-154.
    6. Hong, Areum & Nam, Changi & Kim, Seongcheol, 2020. "What will be the possible barriers to consumers’ adoption of smart home services?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    7. Hosseini, Sayed Saeed & Agbossou, Kodjo & Kelouwani, Sousso & Cardenas, Alben, 2017. "Non-intrusive load monitoring through home energy management systems: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1266-1274.
    8. Hong, Areum & Nam, Changi & Kim, Seongcheol, 2017. "Analysis of the barriers that consumers encounter when smart home service is introduced in South Korea," 14th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Kyoto 2017: Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society 168486, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    9. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D., 2020. "Smart home technologies in Europe: A critical review of concepts, benefits, risks and policies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Pechon, Florian & Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien, 2021. "Home and Motor insurance joined at a household level using multivariate credibility," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2021007, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    11. Wilson, Charlie & Hargreaves, Tom & Hauxwell-Baldwin, Richard, 2017. "Benefits and risks of smart home technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 72-83.
    12. Ehrenhard, Michel & Kijl, Bjorn & Nieuwenhuis, Lambert, 2014. "Market adoption barriers of multi-stakeholder technology: Smart homes for the aging population," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 306-315.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ohlan, Ramphul & Ohlan, Anshu, 2022. "A comprehensive bibliometric analysis and visualization of smart home research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Elena Korneeva & Nina Olinder & Wadim Strielkowski, 2021. "Consumer Attitudes to the Smart Home Technologies and the Internet of Things (IoT)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Andrea Bencsik & Dávid Máté Hargitai & Anastasia Kulachinskaya, 2022. "Trust in and Risk of Technology in Organizational Digitalization," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Flavio Martins & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili & Agatha Oliveira, 2020. "Design Thinking Applied to Smart Home Projects: A User-Centric and Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Tu, Gengyang & Faure, Corinne & Schleich, Joachim & Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte, 2021. "The heat is off! The role of technology attributes and individual attitudes in the diffusion of Smart thermostats – findings from a multi-country survey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Birgul Basarir-Ozel & Hande Bahar Turker & Vesile Aslihan Nasir, 2022. "Identifying the Key Drivers and Barriers of Smart Home Adoption: A Thematic Analysis from the Business Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    5. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Martiskainen, Mari & Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D., 2021. "Knowledge, energy sustainability, and vulnerability in the demographics of smart home technology diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. Große-Kreul, Felix, 2022. "What will drive household adoption of smart energy? Insights from a consumer acceptance study in Germany," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Pal, Debajyoti & Zhang, Xiangmin & Siyal, Saeed, 2021. "Prohibitive factors to the acceptance of Internet of Things (IoT) technology in society: A smart-home context using a resistive modelling approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    8. Furszyfer Del Rio, D.D., 2022. "Smart but unfriendly: Connected home products as enablers of conflict," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Ohlan, Ramphul & Ohlan, Anshu, 2022. "A comprehensive bibliometric analysis and visualization of smart home research," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Elodie Attié & Lars Meyer-Waarden, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Post-Print hal-04065165, HAL.
    11. Marikyan, Davit & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Alamanos, Eleftherios, 2019. "A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 139-154.
    12. Chen, Chien-fei & Nelson, Hannah & Xu, Xiaojing & Bonilla, Gregory & Jones, Nicholas, 2021. "Beyond technology adoption: Examining home energy management systems, energy burdens and climate change perceptions during COVID-19 pandemic," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    13. Attour, Amel & Baudino, Marco & Krafft, Jackie & Lazaric, Nathalie, 2020. "Determinants of energy tracking application use at the city level: Evidence from France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    14. Rohde, Friederike & Quitzow, Leslie, 2021. "Digitale Energiezukünfte und ihre Wirkungsmacht: Visionen der smarten Energieversorgung zwischen Technikoptimismus und Nachhaltigkeit," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 189-211.
    15. Su-Yen Chen & Chiachun Lee, 2019. "Perceptions of the Impact of High-Level-Machine-Intelligence from University Students in Taiwan: The Case for Human Professions, Autonomous Vehicles, and Smart Homes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Serap Turkyilmaz & Erkut Altindað, 2022. "Analysis of Smart Home Systems in the Context of the Internet of Things in Terms of Consumer Experience," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 12(1), pages 19-31.
    17. Tzougas, George & Makariou, Despoina, 2022. "The multivariate Poisson-Generalized Inverse Gaussian claim count regression model with varying dispersion and shape parameters," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117197, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Calver, Philippa & Simcock, Neil, 2021. "Demand response and energy justice: A critical overview of ethical risks and opportunities within digital, decentralised, and decarbonised futures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    19. Daniel J. Mallinson & Saahir Shafi, 2022. "Smart home technology: Challenges and opportunities for collaborative governance and policy research," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(3), pages 330-352, May.
    20. Baudier, Patricia & Ammi, Chantal & Deboeuf-Rouchon, Matthieu, 2020. "Smart home: Highly-educated students' acceptance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:6:p:113-:d:570813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.