IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8549-d861403.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labour Implications on Agricultural Production in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Constanta Tudor

    (Faculty of Management and Rural Development, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 010961 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Toma Adrian Dinu

    (Faculty of Management and Rural Development, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 010961 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Marius Vladu

    (Department of Agricultural and Forestry Technology, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Craiova, 19 “Libertăţii” Street, 200583 Craiova, Romania)

  • Dragoș Smedescu

    (Faculty of Management and Rural Development, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 010961 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ionela Mituko Vlad

    (Faculty of Management and Rural Development, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 010961 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Eduard Alexandru Dumitru

    (Office for Rural Development, Research Institute for Agriculture Economy and Rural Development, 010961 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cristina Maria Sterie

    (Office for Rural Development, Research Institute for Agriculture Economy and Rural Development, 010961 Bucharest, Romania
    Doctoral School of Economics II, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Carmen Luiza Costuleanu

    (Department of Agroeconomy, Faculty of Agriculture, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad Iasi” University of Life Sciences, 700490 Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

Throughout this paper, the theoretical concepts from the above areas were combined with the analysis and interpretation of statistical data from the same areas of interest, resulting in a detailed analysis of how the agricultural labour force influences the yields of the five most important crops in the Romanian agricultural sector, namely, wheat, maize, sunflower, rapeseed and soybean. The analysis was carried out within the eight NUTS-listed development regions. A bibliometric analysis of the importance of the academic environment for agricultural labour force research was previously carried out using VOSviewer software. The content of this document aims to determine the impact that the agricultural labour force has on the productivity of the five main crops cultivated in Romania over large areas during the period 2015–2019, where, although the population employed in agriculture has decreased, the yields of these crops have increased due to the technological development process started in agriculture. As of 2019, only 9% of the total Romanian population is represented by the population employed in agriculture and 39.41% and 61.37% of the total area of the country are represented by arable/agricultural area, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Constanta Tudor & Toma Adrian Dinu & Marius Vladu & Dragoș Smedescu & Ionela Mituko Vlad & Eduard Alexandru Dumitru & Cristina Maria Sterie & Carmen Luiza Costuleanu, 2022. "Labour Implications on Agricultural Production in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8549-:d:861403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hausmann, Ricardo & Nedelkoska, Ljubica, 2018. "Welcome home in a crisis: Effects of return migration on the non-migrants' wages and employment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 101-132.
    2. Maria Nica, 2018. "Study on Labour Force in Romanian Agriculture," International Journal of Sustainable Economies Management (IJSEM), IGI Global, vol. 7(2), pages 36-44, April.
    3. Bisrat Kinfemichael, 2019. "The rise of services and convergence in labor productivity among countries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(21), pages 1749-1755, December.
    4. Nataliia Patyka & Olena Gryschenko & Anatolii Kucher & Maria Hełdak & Beata Raszka, 2021. "Assessment of the Degree of Factors Impact on Employment in Ukraine’s Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Lena Fredriksson & Marian Rizov & Sophia Davidova & Alastair Bailey, 2021. "Smallholder Farms in Bulgaria and Their Contributions to Food and Social Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Restuccia, Diego & Yang, Dennis Tao & Zhu, Xiaodong, 2008. "Agriculture and aggregate productivity: A quantitative cross-country analysis," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 234-250, March.
    7. Martin Nordin, 2014. "Does the Decoupling Reform Affect Agricultural Employment in Sweden? Evidence from an Exogenous Change," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(3), pages 616-636, September.
    8. Antonella Samoggia & Chiara Perazzolo & Piroska Kocsis & Margherita Del Prete, 2019. "Community Supported Agriculture Farmers’ Perceptions of Management Benefits and Drawbacks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Tiberiu Iancu & Ionuț Laurențiu Petre & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Marius Mihai Micu & Ana Ursu & Florina-Ruxandra Teodorescu & Eduard Alexandru Dumitru, 2022. "A Difficult Pattern to Change in Romania, the Perspective of Socio-Economic Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, February.
    10. Muhammad Amjed Iqbal & Muhammad Rizwan & Azhar Abbas & Muhammad Sohail Amjad Makhdum & Rakhshanda Kousar & Muhammad Nazam & Abdus Samie & Nasir Nadeem, 2021. "A Quest for Livelihood Sustainability? Patterns, Motives and Determinants of Non-Farm Income Diversification among Agricultural Households in Punjab, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Cristina Balaceanu & Diana Apostol, 2012. "The Sustainability Approach of Romanian Agriculture," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 2(Special 1), pages 103-107, May.
    12. Jehangir Arshad & Musharraf Aziz & Asma A. Al-Huqail & Muhammad Hussnain uz Zaman & Muhammad Husnain & Ateeq Ur Rehman & Muhammad Shafiq, 2022. "Implementation of a LoRaWAN Based Smart Agriculture Decision Support System for Optimum Crop Yield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Yoan Molinero-Gerbeau & Ana López-Sala & Monica Șerban, 2021. "On the Social Sustainability of Industrial Agriculture Dependent on Migrant Workers. Romanian Workers in Spain’s Seasonal Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    14. Martina Novotná & Tomáš Volek, 2016. "The Significance of Farm Size in the Evaluation of Labour Productivity in Agriculture," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(1), pages 333-340.
    15. Francesca Giarè & Gabriella Ricciardi & Patrizia Borsotto, 2020. "Migrants Workers and Processes of Social Inclusion in Italy: The Possibilities Offered by Social Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Ricardo Chalmeta & Nestor J. Santos-deLeón, 2020. "Sustainable Supply Chain in the Era of Industry 4.0 and Big Data: A Systematic Analysis of Literature and Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, May.
    17. Matías Mayor & Raul Ramos, 2020. "Regions and Economic Resilience: New Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-4, June.
    18. Marius Mihai Micu & Eduard Alexandru Dumitru & Catalin Razvan Vintu & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Gina Fintineru, 2022. "Models Underlying the Success Development of Family Farms in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Eduard Alexandru Dumitru & Ana Ursu & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Marius Mihai Micu, 2021. "Sustainable Development of the Rural Areas from Romania: Development of a Digital Tool to Generate Adapted Solutions at Local Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Yuanying Chi & Wenbing Zhou & Zhenyu Wang & Yu Hu & Xiao Han, 2021. "The Influence Paths of Agricultural Mechanization on Green Agricultural Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    21. Vijaya Ramachandran, 2021. "Convergence, Development, and Energy-Intensive Infrastructure in Africa: A Review of the Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.
    22. Justin George & Adesoji Adelaja, 2021. "Forced Displacement and Agriculture: Implications for Host Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, May.
    23. Ning Yin & Yapeng Wang, 2017. "Impacts of Rural Labor Resource Change on the Technical Efficiency of Crop Production in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beatrice-Simona MANOLACHE & Silviu-Cristian SIMIONESCU & Mihaela PILA & Silvius STANCIU, 2023. "Labor Costs in Agriculture: Brief Analysis of the Romanian Sector," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 33-40.
    2. Zăpucioiu Luiza-Florentina & Sterie Maria-Cristina & Dimitriu Theodor Anton, 2023. "The Relevance of the Circular Economy in the Context of Sustainable Development," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1534-1543, July.
    3. Stoica Gabriela-Dalila, 2023. "The Evolution of Agricultural Holdings – Bibliometric Analysis," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 581-589, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yulmardi, Yulmardi & Junaidi, Junaidi & Nugraha Putra, Dios, 2023. "Is the second generation of transmigrants more prosperous? A study of intergenerational welfare in ex-transmigration settlements," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(1), March.
    2. Marius Mihai Micu & Toma Adrian Dinu & Gina Fintineru & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Elena Stoian & Eduard Alexandru Dumitru & Paula Stoicea & Adina Iorga, 2022. "Climate Change—Between “Myth and Truth” in Romanian Farmers’ Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Eduard Alexandru Dumitru & Cristina Maria Sterie & Steliana Rodino & Marian Butu, 2023. "Consumer Preferences in the Purchase of Agri-Food Products: Implications for the Development of Family Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Zăpucioiu Luiza-Florentina & Sterie Maria-Cristina & Dimitriu Theodor Anton, 2023. "The Relevance of the Circular Economy in the Context of Sustainable Development," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1534-1543, July.
    5. Ionuț-Adrian Drăguleasa & Amalia Niță & Mirela Mazilu & Gheorghe Curcan, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Distribution and Trends of Major Agricultural Crops in Romania Using Interactive Geographic Information System Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-25, October.
    6. Simeon D. Alder, 2016. "In the Wrong Hands: Complementarities, Resource Allocation, and TFP," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(1), pages 199-241, January.
    7. Dietrich Vollrath, 2009. "The dual economy in long-run development," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 287-312, December.
    8. Storesletten, Kjetil & Zhao, Bo & Zilibotti, Fabrizio, 2020. "Business Cycle during Structural Change: Arthur Lewis’ Theory from a Neoclassical Perspective," CEPR Discussion Papers 14964, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Chaoran Chen, 2017. "Untitled Land, Occupational Choice, and Agricultural Productivity," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 91-121, October.
    10. Mike Waugh & David Lagakos & Doug Gollin, 2011. "The Agricultural Productivity Gap in Developing Countries," 2011 Meeting Papers 1397, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    11. Gottlieb Charles & Grobovšek Jan & Poschke Markus & Saltiel Fernando, 2022. "Lockdown Accounting," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 22(1), pages 197-210, January.
    12. Herrendorf, Berthold & Rogerson, Richard & Valentinyi, Ákos, 2014. "Growth and Structural Transformation," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 6, pages 855-941, Elsevier.
    13. Annapia Ferrara & Concetta Ferrara & Sabrina Tomasi & Gigliola Paviotti & Giovanna Bertella & Alessio Cavicchi, 2023. "Exploring the Potential of Social Farmers’ Networking as a Leverage for Inclusive Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Daniel Agness & Travis Baseler & Sylvain Chassang & Pascaline Dupas & Erik Snowberg, 2022. "Valuing the Time of the Self-Employed," CESifo Working Paper Series 9567, CESifo.
    15. Aragón, Fernando M. & Restuccia, Diego & Rud, Juan Pablo, 2022. "Are small farms really more productive than large farms?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    16. Jonathan Colmer & David Lagakos & Martin Shu, 2023. "Is the Electricity Sector a Weak Link in Development?," CESifo Working Paper Series 10874, CESifo.
    17. Paula Bustos & Juan Manuel Castro Vincenzi & Joan Monras & Jacopo Ponticelli, 2019. "Structural Transformation, Industrial Specialization, and Endogenous Growth," Working Papers wp2019_1906, CEMFI.
    18. Jana Lososová & Jaroslav Svoboda & Radek Zdeněk, 2016. "Comparison of Operational Subsidies on Less Favoured Areas in EU Countries," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(3), pages 979-992.
    19. Ibale, Douglas Amuli & Docquier, Frédéric & Iftikhar, Zainab, 2024. "Spatial Inequality, Poverty and Informality in the Democratic Republic of the Congo," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    20. Ferreira, Pedro Cavalcanti & Pessôa, Samuel de Abreu & Veloso, Fernando A., 2010. "The evolution of TFP in Latin America: high productivity when distortions were high?," FGV EPGE Economics Working Papers (Ensaios Economicos da EPGE) 699, EPGE Brazilian School of Economics and Finance - FGV EPGE (Brazil).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8549-:d:861403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.