IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8236-d856625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Key Success Factors for the Operation of SME Cluster Business Ecosystem

Author

Listed:
  • Ming-Kuen Chen

    (Department of Business Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Shih-Wei Wu

    (Department of Business Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Ya-Ping Huang

    (Department of Business Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

  • Feng-Ju Chang

    (Department of Business Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan)

Abstract

With the emphasis on cross-industry cooperation and the increasing complexity of the consumer market, an open and innovative business ecosystem has become a trend, and companies are no longer competing on their own, but rather between systems and systems. This study explores the development of SME cluster operations from a business ecosystem perspective. It summarizes the influencing dimensions and relevant factors of SME cluster ecosystem operation through literature research and expert interviews. We utilize the Fuzzy DEMATEL method and Interpretive Structural Model and classified by classification of matrix multiplication method. At the same time, this study figures out the factors’ correlation and characteristics and further develops their management implications to provide a reference for enterprises and subsequent research. The results reveal that robustness and niche creation with significant influence and low dependence are considered critical factors to influence other factors. Therefore, decision-makers should consider prioritizing control over factors in this category.

Suggested Citation

  • Ming-Kuen Chen & Shih-Wei Wu & Ya-Ping Huang & Feng-Ju Chang, 2022. "The Key Success Factors for the Operation of SME Cluster Business Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8236-:d:856625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8236/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8236/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ming-Kuen Chen & Chung-Min Wu & Lee-Shing Chen & Ya-Ping Huang, 2021. "The Influential Factors of Taiwan SMEs’ Clustering Keystone Business Strategy—The Perspective of Business Ecosystem Using FAHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-35, September.
    2. Ying Han & Guohong Chen & Elena Poh, 2018. "Effects of Informal Contracts on Innovative Cooperation among Enterprises in Industrial Clusters: An Evolutionary Game Analysis," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-10, October.
    3. Pingali Venugopal & Ritu Malhotra & Balamurugan Annamalai, 2018. "The determinants for sustainability in a low-technology SME textile cluster in an emerging economy," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(3), pages 340-356.
    4. Patrick Cohendet & Laurent Simon & Chahira Mehouachi, 2021. "From business ecosystems to ecosystems of innovation: the case of the video game industry in Montréal," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(8), pages 1046-1076, September.
    5. Anatolie Caraganciu & Fabio Musso & Barbara Francioni, 2018. "The Influence of Business Ecosystems on Innovation-Based Industries: A Research on the Mechanical Sector in Italy," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Silvia Cristina Mărginean & Claudia Ogrean & Ramona Orăștean (ed.), Emerging Issues in the Global Economy, chapter 0, pages 101-111, Springer.
    6. Riquelme-Medina, Marta & Stevenson, Mark & Barrales-Molina, Vanesa & Llorens-Montes, Francisco Javier, 2022. "Coopetition in business Ecosystems: The key role of absorptive capacity and supply chain agility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 464-476.
    7. Ferreira, Jorge & Coelho, Arnaldo & Moutinho, Luiz, 2020. "Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    8. Gary Gereffi & Joonkoo Lee, 2016. "Economic and Social Upgrading in Global Value Chains and Industrial Clusters: Why Governance Matters," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 25-38, January.
    9. Junic Kim, 2016. "The platform business model and business ecosystem: quality management and revenue structures," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(12), pages 2113-2132, December.
    10. Jingjing Zeng & Dingjie Liu & Hongtao Yi, 2019. "Agglomeration, Structural Embeddedness, and Enterprises’ Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study of Wuhan Biopharmaceutical Industrial Cluster Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-15, July.
    11. Jia, Peng & Diabat, Ali & Mathiyazhagan, K., 2015. "Analyzing the SSCM practices in the mining and mineral industry by ISM approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P1), pages 76-85.
    12. Rong, Ke & Li, Boyi & Peng, Wan & Zhou, Di & Shi, Xinwei, 2021. "Sharing economy platforms: creating shared value at a business ecosystem level," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    13. Ian R. Gordon & Philip McCann, 2000. "Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 513-532, March.
    14. Nordman, Emilia Rovira & Tolstoy, Daniel, 2016. "The impact of opportunity connectedness on innovation in SMEs’ foreign-market relationships," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 57, pages 47-57.
    15. Furman, Jeffrey L. & Porter, Michael E. & Stern, Scott, 2002. "The determinants of national innovative capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 899-933, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Shouheng & Wang, Zhenqin & Wang, Weicai, 2023. "The impact of regulatory policy on the growth of ride-hailing platform: System dynamics perspective," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 632(P2).
    2. Koliousis, Ioannis G. & Papadimitriou, Stratos & Riza, Elena & Stavroulakis, Peter J. & Tsioumas, Vangelis, 2019. "Strategic correlations for maritime clusters," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 43-57.
    3. Peng Wang & Xiaoyan Lin & Dajun Dai, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Agglomeration of Real-Estate Industry in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Kumar, Sanjesh & Singh, Baljeet, 2019. "Barriers to the international diffusion of technological innovations," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 74-86.
    5. Sari Pekkala Kerr & William R. Kerr & William F. Lincoln, 2015. "Skilled Immigration and the Employment Structures of US Firms," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(S1), pages 147-186.
    6. Herzer Dierk, 2022. "Semi-endogenous Versus Schumpeterian Growth Models: A Critical Review of the Literature and New Evidence," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 73(1), pages 1-55, April.
    7. Catherine Casey & Helen Delaney & Antje Fiedler, 2021. "Recalling the moral dimension: Transnational labour interests and corporate social responsibilities," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 389-405, September.
    8. Sapir, Andre & Aghion, Philippe & Bertola, Giuseppe & Hellwig, Martin & Pisani-Ferry, Jean & Rosati, Dariusz & Vinals, Jose & Wallace, Helen, 2004. "An Agenda for a Growing Europe: The Sapir Report," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199271498.
    9. Tavassoli, Sam, 2015. "Innovation determinants over industry life cycle," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 18-32.
    10. Margareet Visser & Matthew Alford, 2024. "Governance and Power Across Intersecting Value Chains: The Case of South African Apples," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 69-86, January.
    11. Arie Y Lewin & Silvia Massini & Carine Peeters, 2020. "Absorptive capacity, socially enabling mechanisms, and the role of learning from trial and error experiments: A tribute to Dan Levinthal’s contribution to international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(9), pages 1568-1579, December.
    12. de Rassenfosse, Gaétan & Schoen, Anja & Wastyn, Annelies, 2014. "Selection bias in innovation studies: A simple test," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 287-299.
    13. Jinqiu He & Huiwen Su, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Anil K. Gupta & Paul E. Tesluk & M. Susan Taylor, 2007. "Innovation At and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 885-897, December.
    15. Rodionova Irina & Krejdenko Tatiana & Mądry Cezary, 2018. "Cluster Policy in the Russian Federation: A Сase Study of Industrial Clusters," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 37(2), pages 61-75, June.
    16. Alison Ashby, 2016. "From global to local: reshoring for sustainability," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 75-88, December.
    17. Chen, Jian-xun & Zhang, Bo & Zhan, Wu & Sharma, Piyush & Budhwar, Pawan & Tan, Hui, 2022. "Demystifying the non-linear effect of high commitment work systems (HCWS) on firms’ strategic intention of exploratory innovation: An extended resource-based view," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    18. Hongyi Mao & Zongjun Wang & Lin Yi, 2021. "Does Entrepreneurial Orientation Lead to Successful Sustainable Innovation? The Evidence from Chinese Environmentally Friendly Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    19. Hunt, Jennifer & Garant, Jean-Philippe & Herman, Hannah & Munroe, David J., 2012. "Why Don't Women Patent?," IZA Discussion Papers 6886, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    20. Sikandar Ali Qalati & Dragana Ostic & Gu Shuibin & Fan Mingyue, 2022. "A mediated–moderated model for social media adoption and small and medium‐sized enterprise performance in emerging countries," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(3), pages 846-861, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8236-:d:856625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.