IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p8030-d853002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delving Deeper into Market Concentration of Poultry Feed and the Driving Factors for Brand Switching: Evidence from Commercial Egg Producers in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Fatai Abiola Sowunmi

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200005, Nigeria)

  • Abeeb Adetunji Bello

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan 200005, Nigeria)

  • Adebayo Isaiah Ogunniyi

    (United Nations International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), Abuja 900211, Nigeria)

  • Abiodun Olusola Omotayo

    (Food Security and Safety Niche Area, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North West University, Mmabatho 2735, South Africa)

Abstract

An increase in the price of branded feed has been a major problem for the poultry subsector of Nigerian agriculture, and brand switching for a cheap feed at the expense of quality is a common strategy used by egg-producing farmers. Using descriptive statistics, the Markov chain model and the logistic regression model, our study shows that almost 96% of the egg producers use branded feed while 43.1% switched feed brands because of the increase in the price of their preferred brands. Most farmers used Chikun (39.3%) and Top feed (23.2%) six months before data collection and during data collection, respectively. Our study found that approximately 37% of the feed sellers sold at least 10–50 bags per day. We revealed great inequality regarding market concentration: 50% of the feed sellers accounted for 89.5% of the total bags of feed sold per day. Hybrid had the highest customer loyalty. The study shows that Chikun gained 23.7% and 7.1% from Hybrid and Top feed, respectively, while Hybrid gained 36.0% and 35.7% from Chikun and Top feed (change in loyalty by egg producers), respectively. Membership of an association, distance to feed sellers, flock size and the average price of feed per bag were factors that influenced brand switching of poultry feed among egg producers. The study recommends that the government assists in subsidizing the price of critical ingredients (maize and soya bean) in feed production to prevent the price of eggs (the cheap source of protein) from becoming out of reach for most Nigerians.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatai Abiola Sowunmi & Abeeb Adetunji Bello & Adebayo Isaiah Ogunniyi & Abiodun Olusola Omotayo, 2022. "Delving Deeper into Market Concentration of Poultry Feed and the Driving Factors for Brand Switching: Evidence from Commercial Egg Producers in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8030-:d:853002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8030/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8030/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Willy Arafah & Thoby Mutis, 2018. "The Research of Customer Switching Behavior at Some Leasing Companies," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 8(1), pages 115-118.
    2. Sobia Shujaat & Dr. Nadeem A. Syed & Usama Ahmed, 2015. "Factors Behind Brand Switching In Telecommunication Industry Of Pakistan," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 11(2), pages 11-13.
    3. Michael J. Roberts & Wolfram Schlenker, 2009. "World Supply and Demand of Food Commodity Calories," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1235-1242.
    4. Dennis Epple & Bennett T. Mccallum, 2006. "Simultaneous Equation Econometrics: The Missing Example," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 44(2), pages 374-384, April.
    5. Sobia Shujaat & Dr.Nadeem A.Syed & Usama Ahmed, 2015. "Factors Behind Brand Switching In Telecommunication Industry Of Pakistan," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 11(2), pages 29-40.
    6. Jonah Busch & Jens Engelmann & Susan C. Cook-Patton & Bronson W. Griscom & Timm Kroeger & Hugh Possingham & Priya Shyamsundar, 2019. "Potential for low-cost carbon dioxide removal through tropical reforestation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(6), pages 463-466, June.
    7. Heise, Heinke & Crisan, Alexandra & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2015. "The Poultry Market in Nigeria: Market Structures and Potential for Investment in the Market," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(A), pages 1-26, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aaron Kinyu Hoshide, 2023. "Sustainable Development Agricultural Economics and Policy: Intensification versus Diversification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-4, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wajeeha Aslam & Imtiaz Arif & Kashif Farhat & Marium Khursheed, 2018. "The Role of Customer Trust, Service Quality and Value Dimensions in Determining Satisfaction and Loyalty: An Empirical Study of Mobile Telecommunication Industry in Pakistan," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 30(2), pages 177-194.
    2. Nicolas Legrand, 2023. "War in Ukraine: The rational “wait‐and‐see” mode of global food markets," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(2), pages 626-644, June.
    3. Haile, M.G. & Kalkuhl, M., 2014. "Volatility in the international food markets: implications for global agricultural supply and for market and price policy," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 49, March.
    4. Susan C. Cook-Patton & C. Ronnie Drever & Bronson W. Griscom & Kelley Hamrick & Hamilton Hardman & Timm Kroeger & Pablo Pacheco & Shyla Raghav & Martha Stevenson & Chris Webb & Samantha Yeo & Peter W., 2021. "Protect, manage and then restore lands for climate mitigation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(12), pages 1027-1034, December.
    5. Cai, Guixin & Zhang, Hao & Chen, Ziyue, 2019. "Comovement between commodity sectors," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 1247-1258.
    6. Xin Zhao & Bryan K. Mignone & Marshall A. Wise & Haewon C. McJeon, 2024. "Trade-offs in land-based carbon removal measures under 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Valin, Hugo & Havlik, Petr & Mosnier, Aline & Obersteiner, Michael, 2012. "Impacts of Alternative Climate Change Mitigation Policies on Food Consumption under various Diet Scenarios," Conference papers 332253, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Magrini, Emiliano & Morales-Opazo, Cristian & Balie, Jean, 2014. "Supply response along the value chain in selected SSA countries: the case of grains," 2014: Food, Resources and Conflict, December 7-9, 2014. San Diego, California 197193, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    9. Umanath Malaiarasan & R. Paramasivam & K. Thomas Felix & S. J. Balaji, 2020. "Simultaneous equation model for Indian sugar sector," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 22(1), pages 113-141, June.
    10. Nicolas Legrand, 2019. "The Empirical Merit Of Structural Explanations Of Commodity Price Volatility: Review And Perspectives," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 639-664, April.
    11. Peter Maniloff, 2013. "Ethanol and Energy Security," Working Papers 2013-10, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    12. Donald F. Larson & Julian Lampietti & Christophe Gouel & Carlo Cafiero & John Roberts, 2014. "Food Security and Storage in the Middle East and North Africa," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 28(1), pages 48-73.
    13. Lenis Saweda O. Liverpool-Tasie & Awa Sanou & Justice A. Tambo, 2019. "Climate change adaptation among poultry farmers: evidence from Nigeria," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 527-544, December.
    14. Golub, Alexander & Herrera, Diego & Leslie, Gabriela & Pietracci, Breno & Lubowski, Ruben, 2021. "A real options framework for reducing emissions from deforestation: Reconciling short-term incentives with long-term benefits from conservation and agricultural intensification," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    15. Mekbib G. Haile & Matthias Kalkuhl & Joachim Braun, 2014. "Inter- and intra-seasonal crop acreage response to international food prices and implications of volatility," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(6), pages 693-710, November.
    16. Parkhi, Charuta M. & Liverpool-Tasie, Saweda & Reardon, Thomas A., 2022. "Food systems transformation and changing demand for animal proteins: Evidence from Nigeria," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322594, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Ewubare Dennis Brown & Ozar, Vivian, 2018. "Effect of Poultry Production on Agricultural Production in Nigeria," Economy, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 5(1), pages 8-16.
    18. Jane Kabubo-Mariara & Richard Mulwa, 2019. "Adaptation to climate change and climate variability and its implications for household food security in Kenya," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(6), pages 1289-1304, December.
    19. Juan David Alonso-Sanabria & Luis Fernando Melo-Velandia & Daniel Parra-Amado, 2023. "Unveiling the critical role of forest areas amidst climate change: The Latin American case," Borradores de Economia 1254, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    20. Haile, Mekbib G. & Kalkuhl, Matthias & von Braun, Joachim, 2013. "Short-term global crop acreage response to international food prices and implications of volatility," Discussion Papers 145308, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8030-:d:853002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.