IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7530-d843714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Carbon Footprint of Fruit Storage: A Case Study of the Energy and Emission Intensity of Cold Stores

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Johannes du Plessis

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa)

  • Joubert van Eeden

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa)

  • Leila Louise Goedhals-Gerber

    (Department of Logistics, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa)

Abstract

Despite their importance in all transportation chains, logistical sites—and in particular refrigerated facilities—are the weakest link in current emissions literature. This is largely due to a lack of quantitative research that focuses on these facilities. This article is the first of its kind to assess the emissions of eight refrigerated facilities that handle and store fresh fruit. In 2020, the analyzed facilities moved a total of 646,572 pallets of fresh fruit and emitted 32,225 t of CO 2 e. Five of the largest facilities were responsible for handling 18.83% of the total fresh fruit exported from South Africa during 2020. The results revealed that storing and handling a pallet of fruit in a large-scale commercial cold store requires 7.62 kWh of electricity per day. Storing and handling fresh fruit is carbon intensive since each pallet stored translates to 7.52 kg CO 2 e d −1 . However, other factors such as the seasonality and volume of fruit handled, facility characteristics and the availability of solar electricity systems, among others, all have a significant impact on the emissions value of the facility and on the emission intensity per pallet moved through the facility.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Johannes du Plessis & Joubert van Eeden & Leila Louise Goedhals-Gerber, 2022. "The Carbon Footprint of Fruit Storage: A Case Study of the Energy and Emission Intensity of Cold Stores," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7530-:d:843714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7530/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7530/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jörg M. Ries & Eric H. Grosse & Johannes Fichtinger, 2017. "Environmental impact of warehousing: a scenario analysis for the United States," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(21), pages 6485-6499, November.
    2. Konrad Lewczuk & Michał Kłodawski & Paweł Gepner, 2021. "Energy Consumption in a Distributional Warehouse: A Practical Case Study for Different Warehouse Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Ries, J. M. & Grosse, E. H. & Fichtinger, J., 2017. "Environmental impact of warehousing: A scenario analysis for the United States," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 82128, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Majid Eskandarpour & Pierre Dejax & Olivier Péton, 2019. "Multi-Directional Local Search for Sustainable Supply Chain Network Design," Post-Print hal-02407741, HAL.
    2. Tiziana Modica & Sara Perotti & Marco Melacini, 2021. "Green Warehousing: Exploration of Organisational Variables Fostering the Adoption of Energy-Efficient Material Handling Equipment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Kateryna Czerniachowska & Radosław Wichniarek & Krzysztof Żywicki, 2023. "A Model for an Order-Picking Problem with a One-Directional Conveyor and Buffer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Rasih Boztepe & Onur Çetin, 2020. "Sustainable Warehousing: Selecting The Best Warehouse for Solar Transformation," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 8(1), pages 97-110, June.
    5. Sara Perotti & Lorenzo Bruno Prataviera & Marco Melacini, 2022. "Assessing the environmental impact of logistics sites through CO2eq footprint computation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1679-1694, May.
    6. Marco Giacomelli & Francesco Pilati & Matteo Brunelli, 2024. "Bi-Objective Inventory Policy with Comprehensive Environmental Factors Formulation and Service Level Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Tzu-An Chiang & Zhen-Hua Che & Chao-Wei Hung, 2023. "A K-Means Clustering and the Prim’s Minimum Spanning Tree-Based Optimal Picking-List Consolidation and Assignment Methodology for Achieving the Sustainable Warehouse Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Raffaele Carli & Mariagrazia Dotoli & Salvatore Digiesi & Francesco Facchini & Giorgio Mossa, 2020. "Sustainable Scheduling of Material Handling Activities in Labor-Intensive Warehouses: A Decision and Control Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Anchal Patil & Vipulesh Shardeo & Ashish Dwivedi & Md. Abdul Moktadir & Surajit Bag, 2024. "Examining the interactions among smart supply chains and carbon reduction strategies: To attain carbon neutrality," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1227-1246, February.
    10. Mohammed Alnahhal & Bashir Salah & Mohammed Ruzayqat, 2022. "An Efficient Approach to Investigate the Tradeoff between Double Handling and Needed Capacity in Automated Distribution Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-25, June.
    11. Daria Minashkina & Ari Happonen, 2023. "Warehouse Management Systems for Social and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-33, July.
    12. Jarosław Łukasiak & Adam Rosiński & Michał Wiśnios, 2022. "The Issue of Evaluating the Effectiveness of Miniature Safety Fuses as Anti-Damage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Jacek Paś, 2023. "Issues Related to Power Supply Reliability in Integrated Electronic Security Systems Operated in Buildings and Vast Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-22, April.
    14. Sina Abbasi & Babek Erdebilli, 2023. "Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks’ Response to Various Carbon Policies during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    15. Valentin Carlan & David Ceulemans & Edwin Hassel & Stijn Derammelaere & Thierry Vanelslander, 2023. "Automation in cargo loading/unloading processes: do unmanned loading technologies bring benefits when both purchase and operational cost are considered?," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, December.
    16. Miljenko Mustapić & Maja Trstenjak & Petar Gregurić & Tihomir Opetuk, 2023. "Implementation and Use of Digital, Green and Sustainable Technologies in Internal and External Transport of Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    17. Mohammed Alnahhal & Bashir Salah & Rafiq Ahmad, 2022. "Increasing Throughput in Warehouses: The Effect of Storage Reallocation and the Location of Input/Output Station," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7530-:d:843714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.