IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7678-d846114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Efficient Approach to Investigate the Tradeoff between Double Handling and Needed Capacity in Automated Distribution Centers

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Alnahhal

    (Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, American University of Ras Al Khaimah, Ras Al Khaimah P.O. Box 10021, United Arab Emirates)

  • Bashir Salah

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, King Saud University, P.O. Box 800, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mohammed Ruzayqat

    (Transport Systems and Logistics, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, University of Duisburg-Essen, Keetmanstraße 3-9, 47058 Duisburg, Germany)

Abstract

Sustainable techniques in distribution centers, such as automation that reduces the land area needed, can be utilized. Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (AS/RS) are used to efficiently manage the flow of pallets and carton cases in distribution centers. There are two types of AS/RS: one for pallets and another type for cases that are depalletized from pallets. Further enhancements on the system are obtained by investigating both warehouses together. This paper investigates an efficient approach that directly affects the conceptual design of automated distribution centers for the purpose of reducing the total costs. The tradeoff between the throughput (defined by the level of double handling) and warehouse capacity is investigated in this study by finding the best lot sizing rules for different classes of products (A, B, and C). These rules are to determine the method of moving carton cases from the first warehouse to the second one. The number of stacker cranes is determined based on the found throughput. The effect of double handling of pallets on the design is considered for the first time in this study. Analytical formulas and simulation were used to find the throughput and capacity based on the mentioned lot sizing rules. Then, an integer nonlinear model was developed to optimize the system. According to the results of the assumed data, the model can save up to 19.5%. The costs of stacker cranes were found to account for approximately 78.7% of the total costs in the best solution found. A decision support system has been developed to help decision makers find an efficient design of distribution center.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Alnahhal & Bashir Salah & Mohammed Ruzayqat, 2022. "An Efficient Approach to Investigate the Tradeoff between Double Handling and Needed Capacity in Automated Distribution Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7678-:d:846114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7678/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7678/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Young Hae & Hwan Lee, Moon & Hur, Sun, 2005. "Optimal design of rack structure with modular cell in AS/RS," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 172-178, November.
    2. Chen, Gang & Feng, Haolin & Luo, Kaiyi & Tang, Yanli, 2021. "Retrieval-oriented storage relocation optimization of an automated storage and retrieval system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    3. Ye Shi & Xiaolong Guo & Yugang Yu, 2018. "Dynamic warehouse size planning with demand forecast and contract flexibility," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 1313-1325, February.
    4. Özalp Özer & Wei Wei, 2004. "Inventory Control with Limited Capacity and Advance Demand Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 988-1000, December.
    5. Jianming Cai & Xiaokang Li & Yue Liang & Shan Ouyang, 2021. "Collaborative Optimization of Storage Location Assignment and Path Planning in Robotic Mobile Fulfillment Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Dessouky, Maged M. & Wilson, James R., 1991. "Minimizing production costs for a robotic assembly system," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 81-92, February.
    7. Jingjing Hao & Haoming Shi & Victor Shi & Chenchen Yang, 2020. "Adoption of Automatic Warehousing Systems in Logistics Firms: A Technology–Organization–Environment Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Konrad Lewczuk & Michał Kłodawski & Paweł Gepner, 2021. "Energy Consumption in a Distributional Warehouse: A Practical Case Study for Different Warehouse Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    9. Fichtinger, J. & Ries, J. M. & Grosse, E. H. & Baker, P., 2015. "Assessing the environmental impact of integrated inventory and warehouse management," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 74211, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    10. Fichtinger, Johannes & Ries, Jörg M. & Grosse, Eric H. & Baker, Peter, 2015. "Assessing the environmental impact of integrated inventory and warehouse management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PC), pages 717-729.
    11. Yavuz A. Bozer & John A. White, 1990. "Design and Performance Models for End-of-Aisle Order Picking Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(7), pages 852-866, July.
    12. Mohammed Alnahhal & Mosab I. Tabash & Diane Ahrens, 2021. "Optimal selection of third-party logistics providers using integer programming: a case study of a furniture company storage and distribution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 302(1), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xuan Zhang & Tiantian Mo & Yougong Zhang, 2023. "Optimization of Storage Location Assignment for Non-Traditional Layout Warehouses Based on the Firework Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Yi Li & Zhiyang Li, 2022. "Shuttle-Based Storage and Retrieval System: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miljenko Mustapić & Maja Trstenjak & Petar Gregurić & Tihomir Opetuk, 2023. "Implementation and Use of Digital, Green and Sustainable Technologies in Internal and External Transport of Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Mohammed Alnahhal & Bashir Salah & Rafiq Ahmad, 2022. "Increasing Throughput in Warehouses: The Effect of Storage Reallocation and the Location of Input/Output Station," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Jianming Cai & Xiaokang Li & Yue Liang & Shan Ouyang, 2021. "Collaborative Optimization of Storage Location Assignment and Path Planning in Robotic Mobile Fulfillment Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Battini, Daria & Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H. & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2017. "Reprint of “Ergo-lot-sizing: An approach to integrate ergonomic and economic objectives in manual materials handling”," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 32-42.
    5. Konur, Dinçer & Campbell, James F. & Monfared, Sepideh A., 2017. "Economic and environmental considerations in a stochastic inventory control model with order splitting under different delivery schedules among suppliers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 46-65.
    6. Le-Duc, T. & de Koster, M.B.M. & Yu, Y., 2006. "Optimal Storage Rack Design for a 3-dimensional Compact AS/RS," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2006-027-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    7. Shi, Ye & Yu, Yugang & Dong, Yuxuan, 2021. "Warehousing platform’s revenue management: A dynamic model of coordinating space allocation for self-use and rent," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 167-176.
    8. Ghulam Naseer Shah & Muhammad Asim, 2019. "Impact of E-Logistics on Warehousing Management Performance at English Biscuit Manufacturing," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 132-162, December.
    9. Fan Liu & Ning Ma, 2019. "Multicriteria ABC Inventory Classification Using the Social Choice Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Govindan, Kannan & Kilic, Merve & Uyar, Ali & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2021. "Drivers and value-relevance of CSR performance in the logistics sector: A cross-country firm-level investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    11. Atashi Khoei, Arsham & Süral, Haldun & Tural, Mustafa Kemal, 2023. "Energy minimizing order picker forklift routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 604-626.
    12. P. Mala & M. Palanivel & S. Priyan & N. Anbazhagan & Srijana Acharya & Gyanendra Prasad Joshi & Joohan Ryoo, 2021. "Sustainable Decision-Making Approach for Dual-Channel Manufacturing Systems under Space Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Nidhi Handa & S. R. Singh & Neha Punetha, 2022. "Impact of carbon emission in two-echelon supply chain inventory decision with controllable deterioration and two-level trade-credit period," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(4), pages 1555-1586, December.
    14. Brandenburg, Marcus, 2017. "A hybrid approach to configure eco-efficient supply chains under consideration of performance and risk aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 58-76.
    15. Julia Freis & Philipp Vohlidka & Willibald A. Günthner, 2016. "Low-Carbon Warehousing: Examining Impacts of Building and Intra-Logistics Design Options on Energy Demand and the CO 2 Emissions of Logistics Centers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-36, May.
    16. Valentin Carlan & David Ceulemans & Edwin Hassel & Stijn Derammelaere & Thierry Vanelslander, 2023. "Automation in cargo loading/unloading processes: do unmanned loading technologies bring benefits when both purchase and operational cost are considered?," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, December.
    17. Roodbergen, Kees Jan & Vis, Iris F.A., 2009. "A survey of literature on automated storage and retrieval systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(2), pages 343-362, April.
    18. Sara Perotti & Lorenzo Bruno Prataviera & Marco Melacini, 2022. "Assessing the environmental impact of logistics sites through CO2eq footprint computation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1679-1694, May.
    19. Eleonora Bottani & Giorgia Casella & Majcol Nobili & Letizia Tebaldi, 2022. "An Analytic Model for Estimating the Economic and Environmental Impact of Food Cold Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    20. Marco Giacomelli & Francesco Pilati & Matteo Brunelli, 2024. "Bi-Objective Inventory Policy with Comprehensive Environmental Factors Formulation and Service Level Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7678-:d:846114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.