IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7871-d1474591.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bi-Objective Inventory Policy with Comprehensive Environmental Factors Formulation and Service Level Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Giacomelli

    (Deparment of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Francesco Pilati

    (Deparment of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy)

  • Matteo Brunelli

    (Deparment of Industrial Engineering, University of Trento, 38123 Trento, Italy)

Abstract

As firms and consumers engage with environmental issues, decisions for inventory control need to entail this perspective of sustainability. Most green inventory models employ methods such as carbon caps or taxes for dealing with environmental sustainability. This problem can be more generally tackled via an explicit estimation of the environmental drivers of maintaining inventory in a warehouse, paired with the economic perspective within a transparent multi-objective optimization framework. With this goal, this paper builds on a detailed estimation of environmental and cost factors for a continuous-review inventory policy. The bi-objective problem is tackled by keeping the objective functions separate. In particular, the modeling of greenhouse gas emission or cost performance factors for the inventory encompasses factors that can depend on the decision variables, taking into account aspects such as warehouse location, building characterization, energy usage, and transport requirements. The effects of the emission drivers on the multi-objective optimization decisions are analyzed, considering that the problem can be constrained by multiple service level measures. Stockout response can be multifaceted and different service level measures capture different aspects of inventory shortages, affecting the resulting efficient solutions differently. The results highlight the impact of aspects such as warehouse location and supply capacity on solutions for the multi-objective inventory problem. Managerial decisions are thus influenced by warehousing and supply attributes via a traceable link to specific cost and emission determinants.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Giacomelli & Francesco Pilati & Matteo Brunelli, 2024. "Bi-Objective Inventory Policy with Comprehensive Environmental Factors Formulation and Service Level Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7871-:d:1474591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7871/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7871/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hovelaque, Vincent & Bironneau, Laurent, 2015. "The carbon-constrained EOQ model with carbon emission dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 285-291.
    2. Chiu, Huan Neng, 1995. "An approximation to the continuous review inventory model with perishable items and lead times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 93-108, November.
    3. Bozorgi, Ali & Pazour, Jennifer & Nazzal, Dima, 2014. "A new inventory model for cold items that considers costs and emissions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 114-125.
    4. Grubbstrom, Robert W. & Erdem, Asli, 1999. "The EOQ with backlogging derived without derivatives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 529-530, March.
    5. Bijvank, Marco & Vis, Iris F.A., 2012. "Lost-sales inventory systems with a service level criterion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 610-618.
    6. Zied Jemai & Y Bouchery & Asma Ghaffari & Yves Dallery, 2012. "Including sustainability criteria into inventory models," Post-Print hal-01672398, HAL.
    7. Bonney, Maurice & Jaber, Mohamad Y., 2011. "Environmentally responsible inventory models: Non-classical models for a non-classical era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 43-53, September.
    8. Jörg M. Ries & Eric H. Grosse & Johannes Fichtinger, 2017. "Environmental impact of warehousing: a scenario analysis for the United States," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(21), pages 6485-6499, November.
    9. Fleischmann, Moritz & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & Dekker, Rommert & van der Laan, Erwin & van Nunen, Jo A. E. E. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1997. "Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Fichtinger, J. & Ries, J. M. & Grosse, E. H. & Baker, P., 2015. "Assessing the environmental impact of integrated inventory and warehouse management," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 74211, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    11. Demir, Emrah & Bektaş, Tolga & Laporte, Gilbert, 2014. "A review of recent research on green road freight transportation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 775-793.
    12. Bouchery, Yann & Ghaffari, Asma & Jemai, Zied & Dallery, Yves, 2012. "Including sustainability criteria into inventory models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 229-240.
    13. Pilati, Francesco & Giacomelli, Marco & Brunelli, Matteo, 2024. "Environmentally sustainable inventory control for perishable products: A bi-objective reorder-level policy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    14. Chen, Frank Y. & Krass, Dmitry, 2001. "Inventory models with minimal service level constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 120-140, October.
    15. Fichtinger, Johannes & Ries, Jörg M. & Grosse, Eric H. & Baker, Peter, 2015. "Assessing the environmental impact of integrated inventory and warehouse management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PC), pages 717-729.
    16. Ries, J. M. & Grosse, E. H. & Fichtinger, J., 2017. "Environmental impact of warehousing: A scenario analysis for the United States," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 82128, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    17. Katherinne Salas-Navarro & Paula Serrano-Pájaro & Holman Ospina-Mateus & Ronald Zamora-Musa, 2022. "Inventory Models in a Sustainable Supply Chain: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pilati, Francesco & Giacomelli, Marco & Brunelli, Matteo, 2024. "Environmentally sustainable inventory control for perishable products: A bi-objective reorder-level policy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    2. Konur, Dinçer & Campbell, James F. & Monfared, Sepideh A., 2017. "Economic and environmental considerations in a stochastic inventory control model with order splitting under different delivery schedules among suppliers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 46-65.
    3. Suchitra Pattnaik & Mitali Madhusmita Nayak & Stefano Abbate & Piera Centobelli, 2021. "Recent Trends in Sustainable Inventory Models: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Battini, Daria & Glock, Christoph H. & Grosse, Eric H. & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2017. "Reprint of “Ergo-lot-sizing: An approach to integrate ergonomic and economic objectives in manual materials handling”," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 32-42.
    5. Tang, Shaolong & Wang, Wenjie & Cho, Stella & Yan, Hong, 2018. "Reducing emissions in transportation and inventory management: (R, Q) Policy with considerations of carbon reduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 327-340.
    6. Yann Bouchery & Asma Ghaffari & Zied Jemai & Jan Fransoo, 2016. "Sustainable transportation and order quantity: insights from multiobjective optimization," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 367-396, September.
    7. Sara Perotti & Lorenzo Bruno Prataviera & Marco Melacini, 2022. "Assessing the environmental impact of logistics sites through CO2eq footprint computation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1679-1694, May.
    8. Dye, Chung-Yuan & Yang, Chih-Te, 2015. "Sustainable trade credit and replenishment decisions with credit-linked demand under carbon emission constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 187-200.
    9. Y Bouchery & Asma Ghaffari & Zied Jemai & Jan C Fransoo, 2016. "Sustainable transportation and order quantity: insights from multiobjective optimization," Post-Print hal-01954465, HAL.
    10. Jasmina Žic & Samir Žic & Goran Đukić & Svetlana Dabić-Miletić, 2024. "Exploring Green Inventory Management through Periodic Review Inventory Systems—A Comprehensive Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Zhimiao Tao & Jiuping Xu, 2019. "Carbon-Regulated EOQ Models with Consumers’ Low-Carbon Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Raffaele Carli & Mariagrazia Dotoli & Salvatore Digiesi & Francesco Facchini & Giorgio Mossa, 2020. "Sustainable Scheduling of Material Handling Activities in Labor-Intensive Warehouses: A Decision and Control Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, April.
    13. Schaefer, Brian & Konur, Dinçer, 2015. "Economic and environmental considerations in a continuous review inventory control system with integrated transportation decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 142-165.
    14. Bozorgi, Ali, 2016. "Multi-product inventory model for cold items with cost and emission consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 123-142.
    15. Battini, Daria & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2014. "A sustainable EOQ model: Theoretical formulation and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 145-153.
    16. Bouchery, Yann & Ghaffari, Asma & Jemai, Zied & Tan, Tarkan, 2017. "Impact of coordination on costs and carbon emissions for a two-echelon serial economic order quantity problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 520-533.
    17. Daria Battini & Martina Calzavara & Ilaria Isolan & Fabio Sgarbossa & Francesco Zangaro, 2018. "Sustainability in Material Purchasing: A Multi-Objective Economic Order Quantity Model under Carbon Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    18. Harpreet Kaur & Surya Prakash Singh, 2019. "Sustainable procurement and logistics for disaster resilient supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 309-354, December.
    19. Jin-Kyung Kwak, 2021. "An Order-Up-to Inventory Model with Sustainability Consideration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-8, December.
    20. Andriolo, Alessandro & Battini, Daria & Persona, Alessandro & Sgarbossa, Fabio, 2015. "Haulage sharing approach to achieve sustainability in material purchasing: New method and numerical applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 308-318.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7871-:d:1474591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.