IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7144-d836002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymmetric Effects of Economic Development, Agroforestry Development, Energy Consumption, and Population Size on CO 2 Emissions in China

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    Institute of Ecological Civilization Construction and Forestry Development with Chinese Characteristics, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Jiwei Liu

    (School of Applied Economics, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China)

  • Qun Li

    (School of Applied Economics, University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 102488, China
    Institute of Ecological Development, China ECO Development Association, Beijing 100013, China)

Abstract

The COVID-19 epidemic and the Russian–Ukrainian conflict have led to a global food and energy crisis, making the world aware of the importance of agroforestry development for a country. Modern agriculture mechanization leads to massive energy consumption and increased CO 2 emissions. At the same time, China is facing serious demographic problems and a lack of consumption in the domestic market. The Chinese government is faced with the dilemma of balancing environmental protection with economic development in the context of the “double carbon” strategy. This article uses annual World Bank statistics from 1990 to 2020 to study the asymmetric relationships between agroforestry development, energy consumption, population size, and economic development on CO 2 emissions in China using the partial least squares path model (PLS-PM), the autoregressive VAR vector time series model, and the Granger causality test. The results are as follows: (1) The relationship between economic development and carbon dioxide emissions, agroforestry development and carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions, and population size and carbon dioxide emissions are both direct and indirect, with an overall significant positive effect. There is a direct negative relationship between population size and carbon dioxide emissions. (2) The results of the Granger causality test show that economic development, energy consumption, and CO 2 emissions are the causes of the development of agroforestry; economic development, agroforestry development, population size, and CO 2 emissions are the causes of energy consumption; energy consumption is the cause of economic development and CO 2 emissions; and agroforestry development is the cause of population size and energy consumption. (3) In the next three years, China’s agroforestry development will be influenced by the impulse response of economic development, energy consumption, and CO 2 emission factors, showing a decreasing development trend. China’s energy consumption will be influenced by the impulse response of economic development, agroforestry development, population size, and CO 2 emission factors, showing a decreasing development trend, followed by an increasing development trend. China’s CO 2 emission will be influenced by the impulse response of energy consumption and agroforestry development. China’s CO 2 emissions will be influenced by the impulse response of energy consumption and agroforestry development factors, showing a downward and then an upward development trend.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Liu & Jiwei Liu & Qun Li, 2022. "Asymmetric Effects of Economic Development, Agroforestry Development, Energy Consumption, and Population Size on CO 2 Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-34, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7144-:d:836002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7144/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7144/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xing Luo & Kangning Xiong & Juan Zhang & Dong Chen, 2021. "A Study on Optimal Agroforestry Planting Patterns in the Buffer Zone of World Natural Heritage Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Sims, Christopher A, 1980. "Comparison of Interwar and Postwar Business Cycles: Monetarism Reconsidered," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(2), pages 250-257, May.
    3. Heather E. Schier & Kathrin A. Eliot & Sterling A. Herron & Lauren K. Landfried & Zoë Migicovsky & Matthew J. Rubin & Allison J. Miller, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of Perennial and Annual Phaseolus Seed Nutrient Concentrations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Yong Yang & Junsong Jia & Chundi Chen, 2020. "Residential Energy-Related CO 2 Emissions in China’s Less Developed Regions: A Case Study of Jiangxi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, March.
    5. Huihui Wang & Weihua Zeng, 2019. "Revealing Urban Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Emission Characteristics and Influencing Mechanisms from the Perspective of Commuting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Noémie Hotelier-Rous & Geneviève Laroche & Ève Durocher & David Rivest & Alain Olivier & Fabien Liagre & Alain Cogliastro, 2020. "Temperate Agroforestry Development: The Case of Québec and of France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Shi, Huiting & Chai, Jian & Lu, Quanying & Zheng, Jiali & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "The impact of China's low-carbon transition on economy, society and energy in 2030 based on CO2 emissions drivers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    8. Hanxiong Zhu & Kexi Pan & Yong Liu & Zheng Chang & Ping Jiang & Yongfu Li, 2019. "Analyzing Temporal and Spatial Characteristics and Determinant Factors of Energy-Related CO 2 Emissions of Shanghai in China Using High-Resolution Gridded Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Chulin Pan & Huayi Wang & Hongpeng Guo & Hong Pan, 2021. "How Do the Population Structure Changes of China Affect Carbon Emissions? An Empirical Study Based on Ridge Regression Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Huali Xiang & Jun Yang & Xi Liu & Jay Lee, 2019. "Balancing Population Distribution and Sustainable Economic Development in Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Ming Qi & Jing Xu & Nnenna Bridget Amuji & Shumingrui Wang & Fengqian Xu & Huan Zhou, 2022. "The Nexus among Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Trade Openness: Evidence from West Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Maxwell Kongkuah & Hongxing Yao & Veli Yilanci, 2022. "The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions in China: the role of urbanisation and international trade," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 4684-4708, April.
    13. Christopher A. Sims, 1982. "Policy Analysis with Econometric Models," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 13(1), pages 107-164.
    14. Wen Guo & Tao Sun & Hongjun Dai, 2016. "Effect of Population Structure Change on Carbon Emission in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Bolson, Natanael & Yutkin, Maxim & Patzek, Tadeusz, 2021. "Energy efficiency and sustainability assessment for methane harvesting from Lake Kivu," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    16. Christina Schaffer & Karin Eksvärd & Johanna Björklund, 2019. "Can Agroforestry Grow beyond Its Niche and Contribute to a Transition towards Sustainable Agriculture in Sweden?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-14, June.
    17. Dimitrios P. Platis & Christos D. Anagnostopoulos & Aggeliki D. Tsaboula & Georgios C. Menexes & Kiriaki L. Kalburtji & Andreas P. Mamolos, 2019. "Energy Analysis, and Carbon and Water Footprint for Environmentally Friendly Farming Practices in Agroecosystems and Agroforestry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-11, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard H. Clarida & Benjamin M. Friedman, 1986. "The Behavior of U.S. Short-Term Interest Rates Since 1979-10," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 695, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    2. Terrence Kinal & Jonathan Ratner, 1986. "A VAR Forecasting Model of a Regional Economy: Its Construction and Comparative Accuracy," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 113-126, August.
    3. Don Bredin & Gerard O'Reilly, 2004. "An analysis of the transmission mechanism of monetary policy in Ireland," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 49-58.
    4. Ford, Stephen A., 1986. "A Beginner'S Guide To Vector Autoregression," Staff Papers 13527, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    5. Leeper, Eric M. & Gordon, David B., 1992. "In search of the liquidity effect," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 341-369, June.
    6. Duo Qin, 2006. "VAR Modelling Approach and Cowles Commission Heritage," Working Papers 557, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    7. Hiro Y. Toda & Peter C.B. Phillips, 1991. "The Spurious Effect of Unit Roots on Exogeneity Tests in Vector Autoregressions: An Analytical Study," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 978, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    8. Monticello, Carlo & Tristani, Oreste, 1999. "What does the single monetary policy do? A SVAR benchmark for the European Central Bank," Working Paper Series 2, European Central Bank.
    9. Bennett T. McCallum, 1985. "Monetary vs. Fiscal Policy Effects: A Review of the Debate," NBER Working Papers 1556, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Ahmed, Habib, 1998. "Responses in output to monetary shocks and the interest rate: a rational expectations model with working capital," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 351-358, December.
    11. Apergis, Nicholas & Bouras, Christos & Christou, Christina & Hassapis, Christis, 2018. "Multi-horizon wealth effects across the G7 economies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 165-176.
    12. Raihan, Asif & Mainul Bari, A.B.M., 2024. "Energy-economy-environment nexus in China: The role of renewable energies toward carbon neutrality," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    13. Monticello, Carlo & Tristani, Oreste, 1999. "What does the single monetary policy do? A SVAR benchmark for the European Central Bank," Working Paper Series 0002, European Central Bank.
    14. Wang, Ling, 2016. "Unconventional monetary policy and aggregate bank lending: Does financial structure matter?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 1060-1077.
    15. Gallo, Lindsey A. & Hann, Rebecca N. & Li, Congcong, 2016. "Aggregate earnings surprises, monetary policy, and stock returns," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 103-120.
    16. Antonio Aznar & Mª Teresa Aparicio & Francisco Javier Trivez, 1991. "Modelo LSW versus modelo NRH-GAP, aplicación de una nueva metodología de selección de modelos," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 15(3), pages 575-599, September.
    17. Liyuan Fu & Qing Wang, 2022. "Spatial and Temporal Distribution and the Driving Factors of Carbon Emissions from Urban Production Energy Consumption," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-29, September.
    18. Barthélemy, Jean & Marx, Magali, 2017. "Solving endogenous regime switching models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 1-25.
    19. Ahmed, M. Iqbal & Cassou, Steven P., 2021. "Asymmetries in the effects of unemployment expectation shocks as monetary policy shifts with economic conditions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    20. Zijun Wang & Andrew J. Rettenmaier, 2008. "Deficits, Explicit Debt, Implicit Debt, and Interest Rates: Some Empirical Evidence," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 75(1), pages 208-222, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7144-:d:836002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.