IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7101-d835328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Effect of Redundant Resources on Corporate Entrepreneurial Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Lexin Yun

    (Business School, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Xiaolin Yao

    (Business School, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Wenlong Zhu

    (Business School, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

  • Zishan Zhang

    (Business School, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China)

Abstract

Redundant resources are indispensable resources in corporate entrepreneurship. Nowadays, establishing how to evaluate the impact of redundant resources on corporate entrepreneurial performance has become a critical issue considered by managers. However, few studies have addressed this issue. Based on the perspective of resource bricolage and corporate resource interaction, this work constructs a theoretical model to analyze the influence of redundant resources on corporate entrepreneurial performance. Data were collected in Chinese enterprises. A structural equation modeling (SEM) technique was used. We obtained four valuable conclusions. First, redundant resources have a significant positive effect on corporate entrepreneurial performance. Second, redundant resources exert a significant positive influence on resource bricolage. Third, resource bricolage has a significant positive influence on corporate entrepreneurial performance. Fourth, resource bricolage plays a partial mediation effect between redundant resources and corporate entrepreneurial performance. The insights can provide theoretical and practical guidance for enterprises that intend to use redundant resources to carry out entrepreneurial activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Lexin Yun & Xiaolin Yao & Wenlong Zhu & Zishan Zhang, 2022. "Evaluating the Effect of Redundant Resources on Corporate Entrepreneurial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7101-:d:835328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7101/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7101/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simsek, Zeki & Lubatkin, Michael H. & Veiga, John F. & Dino, Richard N., 2009. "The role of an entrepreneurially alert information system in promoting corporate entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(8), pages 810-817, August.
    2. Zeki Simsek & John F. Veiga & Michael H. Lubatkin, 2007. "The Impact of Managerial Environmental Perceptions on Corporate Entrepreneurship: Towards Understanding Discretionary Slack's Pivotal Role," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(8), pages 1398-1424, December.
    3. Shaker A. Zahra, 1993. "A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior: A Critique and Extension," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 17(4), pages 5-21, July.
    4. Rigtering, J.P.C. (Coen) & Weitzel, G.U. (Utz) & Muehlfeld, K. (Katrin), 2019. "Increasing quantity without compromising quality: How managerial framing affects intrapreneurship," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 224-241.
    5. Justin Tan & Mike W. Peng, 2003. "Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: two studies from an emerging economy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(13), pages 1249-1263, December.
    6. Zeki Simsek & Michael Lubatkin & John F. Veiga & Richard N. Dino, 2009. "The role of an entrepreneurially alert information system in promoting corporate entrepreneurship," Post-Print hal-02312548, HAL.
    7. Xiaoyu Yu & Jiangyong Lu & Xiaomin Liu & Yihan Wang & Yilin Jia & Yi Su, 2021. "Fractal Characteristics of Discontinuous Growth of Digital Company: An Entrepreneurial Bricolage Perspective," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-9, February.
    8. Suk Bong Choi & Wang Ro Lee & Seung-Wan Kang, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Orientation, Resource Orchestration Capability, Environmental Dynamics and Firm Performance: A Test of Three-Way Interaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Ai-xiang Zheng, 2021. "Applying resource bricolage theory to the city integration of new-generation migrant workers in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Li, Yanhong & Kou, Gang & Li, Guangxu & Peng, Yi, 2022. "Consensus reaching process in large-scale group decision making based on bounded confidence and social network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 790-802.
    11. Christian Busch & Harry Barkema, 2021. "From necessity to opportunity: Scaling bricolage across resource‐constrained environments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 741-773, April.
    12. Carlier, Jacques & Neron, Emmanuel, 2007. "Computing redundant resources for the resource constrained project scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1452-1463, February.
    13. Lanza, Andrea & Simone, Giuseppina & Bruno, Randolph, 2016. "Resource orchestration in the context of knowledge resources acquisition and divestment. The empirical evidence from the Italian “Serie A” football," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 145-157.
    14. Wu, Jie & Wu, Zefu, 2014. "Local and international knowledge search and product innovation: The moderating role of technology boundary spanning," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 542-551.
    15. Richard Gentry & Clay Dibrell & Jaemin Kim, 2016. "Long–Term Orientation in Publicly Traded Family Businesses: Evidence of a Dominant Logic," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(4), pages 733-757, July.
    16. Yongbo Sun & Shuang Du & Yixin Ding, 2020. "The Relationship between Slack Resources, Resource Bricolage, and Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification—Based on Resource Opportunity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, February.
    17. Wissal Ben Arfi & Lubica Hikkerova, 2021. "Corporate entrepreneurship, product innovation, and knowledge conversion: the role of digital platforms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1191-1204, February.
    18. Tom Vanacker & Veroniek Collewaert & Shaker A. Zahra, 2017. "Slack resources, firm performance, and the institutional context: Evidence from privately held European firms," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 1305-1326, June.
    19. Yang, Man, 2018. "International entrepreneurial marketing strategies of MNCs: Bricolage as practiced by marketing managers," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 1045-1056.
    20. Zhu, Wenlong & Mou, Jian & Benyoucef, Morad, 2019. "Exploring purchase intention in cross-border E-commerce: A three stage model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 320-330.
    21. Suddaby, Roy & Bruton, Garry D. & Si, Steven X., 2015. "Entrepreneurship through a qualitative lens: Insights on the construction and/or discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 1-10.
    22. Marlin Hoffman & Catherina J. Schenck & Frederick Herbst, 2022. "Exploring the Intersection Where Business Models, a Circular Economy and Sustainability Meet in the Waste Economy: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    23. Xiaoyu Yu & Yajie Li & Zhongfeng Su & Yida Tao & Bang Nguyen & Fan Xia, 2019. "Entrepreneurial bricolage and its effects on new venture growth and adaptiveness in an emerging economy," Post-Print hal-02160950, HAL.
    24. Christine Blanka, 2019. "An individual-level perspective on intrapreneurship: a review and ways forward," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 919-961, November.
    25. Juanru Wang & Yajiong Xue & Jin Yang, 2020. "Boundary‐spanning search and firms' green innovation: The moderating role of resource orchestration capability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 361-374, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeyan Miao & Guohao Zhao, 2023. "Impacts of Digital Information Management Systems on Green Transformation of Manufacturing Enterprises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Wang, Kai & Chen, Xi & Wang, Chenye, 2023. "The impact of sustainable development planning in resource-based cities on corporate ESG–Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PA).
    3. Jun Sun & Ying Zhao & Suchun Wu & Yang Zhou, 2023. "How Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy Promotes Part-Time Entrepreneurial Behavior: The Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Changchun Li & Sen Wang, 2022. "Digital Optimization, Green R&D Collaboration, and Green Technological Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Heying Liu & Chan Lyu, 2022. "Can ESG Ratings Stimulate Corporate Green Innovation? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Jiafeng Gu, 2024. "Peer influence, market power, and enterprises' green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 108-121, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongbo Sun & Hong Sun, 2021. "Executives’ Environmental Awareness and Eco-Innovation: An Attention-Based View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Kamal Sakhdari & J. Henri Burgers, 2018. "The moderating role of entrepreneurial management in the relationship between absorptive capacity and corporate entrepreneurship: an attention-based view," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 927-950, December.
    3. Lennart Burger & Ivana Blažková, 2020. "Internal Determinants Promoting Corporate Entrepreneurship in Established Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(2), pages 19-45.
    4. Xiaoxiang Li & Shuhan Zhang, 2021. "Does Slack Buffer? Market Performance after Environmental Shock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Manuel Castriotta & Michela Loi & Elona Marku & Ludovica Moi, 2021. "Disentangling the corporate entrepreneurship construct: conceptualizing through co-words," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 2821-2863, April.
    6. Tabesh, Pooya & Vera, Dusya & Keller, Robert T., 2019. "Unabsorbed slack resource deployment and exploratory and exploitative innovation: How much does CEO expertise matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 65-80.
    7. Yue Vaughan & Yinyoung Rhou & Yoon Koh & Manisha Singal, 2024. "Slack resources and employee-centered corporate social responsibility in restaurant companies," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(3), pages 592-614, May.
    8. Sulu Zhu & Pengqun Gao & Zhen Tang & Ming Tian, 2022. "The Research Venation Analysis and Future Prospects of Organizational Slack," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-23, October.
    9. Ciprian Stan & Mike Peng & Garry Bruton, 2014. "Slack and the performance of state-owned enterprises," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 473-495, June.
    10. Tom Vanacker & Veroniek Collewaert & Ine Paeleman, 2013. "The Relationship between Slack Resources and the Performance of Entrepreneurial Firms: The Role of Venture Capital and Angel Investors," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(6), pages 1070-1096, September.
    11. Vivien Beattie & Robin Roslender & Sarah Jane Smith, 2013. "Balancing on a Tightrope: Customer Relational Capital, Value Creation and Disclosure," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3-4), pages 19-52.
    12. Lanivich, Stephen E. & Smith, Adam & Levasseur, Ludvig & Pidduck, Robert J. & Busenitz, Lowell & Tang, Jintong, 2022. "Advancing entrepreneurial alertness: Review, synthesis, and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1165-1176.
    13. Samina Karim & Chi‐Hyon Lee & Manuela N. Hoehn‐Weiss, 2023. "Task bottlenecks and resource bottlenecks: A holistic examination of task systems through an organization design lens," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(8), pages 1839-1878, August.
    14. Gregory Stock & Noel Greis & William Fischer, 2018. "Organisational Slack And New Product Time To Market Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(04), pages 1-34, May.
    15. Bogatyreva, Karina & Laskovaia, Anastasiia & Osiyevskyy, Oleksiy, 2022. "Entrepreneurial activity, intrapreneurship, and conducive institutions: Is there a connection?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 45-56.
    16. Yongbo Sun & Shuang Du & Yixin Ding, 2020. "The Relationship between Slack Resources, Resource Bricolage, and Entrepreneurial Opportunity Identification—Based on Resource Opportunity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, February.
    17. Mike W. Peng & Joyce C. Wang & Nishant Kathuria & Jia Shen & Miranda J. Welbourne Eleazar, 2023. "Toward an institution-based paradigm," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 353-382, June.
    18. Jun-You Lin & Chih-Hai Yang, 2020. "Heterogeneity in industry–university R&D collaboration and firm innovative performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 1-25, July.
    19. Jeffery S. McMullen & Katrina M. Brownell & Joel Adams, 2021. "What Makes an Entrepreneurship Study Entrepreneurial? Toward A Unified Theory of Entrepreneurial Agency," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(5), pages 1197-1238, September.
    20. Guo, Feng & Zou, Bo & Zhang, Xiaofei & Bo, Qingwen & Li, Kai, 2020. "Financial slack and firm performance of SMMEs in China: Moderating effects of government subsidies and market-supporting institutions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7101-:d:835328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.