IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6863-d831566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Official Website as an Essential E-Governance Tool: A Comparative Analysis of the Romanian Cities’ Websites in 2019 and 2022

Author

Listed:
  • Nicu Gavriluță

    (Department of Sociology and Social Work, “Al.I.Cuza” University of Iași, 700506 Iași, Romania)

  • Virgil Stoica

    (Department of Political Sciences, International Relations and European Studies, “Al.I.Cuza” University of Iași, 700506 Iași, Romania)

  • Gheorghe-Ilie Fârte

    (Department of Communication Sciences and Public Relations, “Al.I.Cuza” University of Iași, 700506 Iași, Romania)

Abstract

This paper aims to measure the quality of all Romanian cities’ websites in 2019 and 2022, before and after the disruptive event of COVID-19. Since the official websites are the core instrument of e-governance, the changes in the quality of Romanian cities’ websites reflect the changes in the development of urban e-governance in Romania. The COVID-19 lockdowns and contact restrictions and the moving of most activities into the online environment had the potential to impact the performance of Romanian cities’ websites significantly and catalyze the progress of local e-governance. The quality of Romanian cities’ official websites was measured using an adapted survey instrument proposed by Holzer and Kim and Manoharan, Melitski, and Holzer. The tool covers five critical criteria of website quality or performance: personal data security, usability, content, services, and citizen participation. The research results may seem contrary to expectations: the improvements of websites have been incremental rather than transformational. Although our research provides only a case study, we may assert that the reform of traditional administration remains a step-by-step process. Our study’s main contribution consists in showing that the progress of e-governance is an incremental process even in a situation of emergency that requires the moving of most activities into the online environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicu Gavriluță & Virgil Stoica & Gheorghe-Ilie Fârte, 2022. "The Official Website as an Essential E-Governance Tool: A Comparative Analysis of the Romanian Cities’ Websites in 2019 and 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6863-:d:831566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6863/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6863/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. Sadashivam, 2010. "A New Paradigm in Governance: Is It True for E-Governance?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 1(4), pages 303-317, December.
    2. Zhang, Yi & Kimathi, Flora A., 2022. "Exploring the stages of E-government development from public value perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. Nagy K. Hanna, 2010. "e-Transformation: Enabling New Development Strategies," Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, Springer, number 978-1-4419-1185-8, December.
    4. Malodia, Suresh & Dhir, Amandeep & Mishra, Mahima & Bhatti, Zeeshan Ahmed, 2021. "Future of e-Government: An integrated conceptual framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Yu, Sarah Yanyue, 2021. "A review of the accessibility of ACT COVID-19 information portals," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qihui Xie & Yanan Xue & Zhuojun Zhao, 2022. "Understanding the Scientific Topics in the Chinese Government’s Communication about COVID-19: An LDA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Equey, Catherine & Priftis, Athanasios & Trabichet, Jean-Philippe & Hutzli, Vanissla, 2024. "Designing a digital citizen-centered service," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Farooq, Ali & Laato, Samuli & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Isoaho, Jouni, 2021. "Understanding the impact of information sources on COVID-19 related preventive measures in Finland," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    3. Huiying Zhang & Zijian Zhu, 2024. "Mobile Government Service Promotion Strategies: Exploring Sustainable Development Pathways Based on Provincial Government Practices in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Osama Abied & Othman Ibrahim & Siti Nuur-Ila Mat Kamal & Ibrahim M. Alfadli & Weam M. Binjumah & Norafida Ithnin & Maged Nasser, 2022. "Probing Determinants Affecting Intention to Adopt Cloud Technology in E-Government Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, November.
    5. Ibrahim Mutambik, 2024. "Culturally Informed Technology: Assessing Its Importance in the Transition to Smart Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.
    6. Guan, Weili & Li, Yuming & Liu, Jun & Ullah, Sana & Metawa, Noura, 2024. "How does digital government affect natural resource sustainability? A global perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Patricia Acosta-Vargas & Sylvia Novillo-Villegas & Belén Salvador-Acosta & Manuel Calvopina & Nikolaos Kyriakidis & Esteban Ortiz-Prado & Luis Salvador-Ullauri, 2022. "Accessibility Analysis of Worldwide COVID-19-Related Information Portals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, September.
    8. N.G. Vovchenko & A.V. Andreeva & A.S. Orobinskiy & Y.M. Filippov, 2017. "Competitive Advantages of Financial Transactions on the Basis of the Blockchain Technology in Digital Economy," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 193-212.
    9. Ana-Maria Apostol & Mari-Isabella Stan, 2021. "Comparative study on the analysis of digital governance in Romania and Bulgaria," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 24(1), pages 38-53, October.
    10. Asaad Alzayed, 2024. "Evaluating the Role of Requirements Engineering Practices in the Sustainability of Electronic Government Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Ciesielska, Magdalena & Rizun, Nina & Chabik, Jakub, 2022. "Assessment of E-government inclusion policies toward seniors: A framework and case study," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7).
    12. Maura Campra & Paolo Esposito & Valerio Brescia, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and technological perspectives in healthcare: An exploratory analysis of the evolution of the anti‐corruption system through multiple case studies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2816-2829, November.
    13. Camilleri, Mark Anthony & Camilleri, Adriana Caterina, 2022. "Remote learning via video conferencing technologies: Implications for research and practice," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Bansal, Anjali & Panchal, Tanvi & Jabeen, Fauzia & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Singh, Gurmeet, 2023. "A study of human resource digital transformation (HRDT): A phenomenon of innovation capability led by digital and individual factors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    15. Juan Erasmo Gomez-Morantes & Richard Heeks & Richard Duncombe, 2022. "Conceptualising Digital Platforms in Developing Countries as Socio-Technical Transitions: A Multi-level Perspective Analysis of EasyTaxi in Colombia," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(2), pages 978-1002, April.
    16. Asta Valackiene & Jovita Giedraitiene, 2024. "A Model of Public Sector E-Services Development Efficiency as a Sustainable Competitive Advantage," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Georgios Kontogeorgis & Nikolaos Varotsis, 2021. "Reinstating Greek E-Governance: A Framework For E-Government Benchmarking, Improvement And Government Policies," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 6, pages 103-127.
    18. Guido Migliaccio, 2019. "Disabled People in the Stakeholder Theory: a Literature Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(4), pages 1657-1678, December.
    19. Gao, Pengfei & Li, Zhiyi & Shi, Rubiao, 2024. "Impact of natural resource dependence on green technology development: Role of digital governance in mitigating resource-curse using big data," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Lechman, Ewa & Kaur, Harleen, 2016. "Social development and ICT adoption. Developing world perspective," MPRA Paper 69354, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6863-:d:831566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.