IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p5848-d813626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Whether Increasing Maize Planting Density Increases the Total Water Use Depends on Soil Water in the 0–60 cm Soil Layer in the North China Plain

Author

Listed:
  • Jingtao Qin

    (Key Laboratory of Water Saving Irrigation Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453002, China
    Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Xiaosen Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Water Saving Irrigation Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453002, China)

  • Xichao Fan

    (Key Laboratory of Water Saving Irrigation Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453002, China
    Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Mingliang Jiang

    (Key Laboratory of Water Saving Irrigation Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453002, China)

  • Mouchao Lv

    (Key Laboratory of Water Saving Irrigation Engineering, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453002, China)

Abstract

Increasing planting density generally increases total water use by maize ( Zea mays L.), but there are contrasting conclusions as well. To determine whether increasing planting density would increase total water use by maize, a 3-year field experiment was conducted in the North China Plain. In 2018, maize was planted at the four densities of 57,100, 66,700, 80,000, and 100,000 plants ha −1 . In 2019 and 2020, another four planting densities of 27,800, 41,700, 66,700, and 111,100 plants ha −1 were selected. The results showed that increasing planting density increased leaf area index but decreased leaf stomatal conductance; maize grain yield reached the maximum at about 80,000 plants ha −1 . At the VE-V6 and R3-R6 stage, soil water use occurred mainly in the 0–60 cm soil layer, and planting density showed no effect on total soil water use by maize. At the V6-R3 stage, when soil water in the 0–60 cm soil layer was sufficient to meet the evapotranspiration demand, soil water use occurred mainly in the 0–60 cm soil layer; increasing planting density did not increase total soil water use. When soil water in the 0–60 cm soil layer was insufficient and could not meet the demand of evapotranspiration, soil water use in the 60–100 cm soil layer increased greatly and kept rising with increased planting density, resulting in elevated total soil water use. Therefore, we conclude that the effect of planting density on water use by maize varies with soil water content in the 0–60 cm soil layer in the North China Plain.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingtao Qin & Xiaosen Wang & Xichao Fan & Mingliang Jiang & Mouchao Lv, 2022. "Whether Increasing Maize Planting Density Increases the Total Water Use Depends on Soil Water in the 0–60 cm Soil Layer in the North China Plain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5848-:d:813626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5848/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5848/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhou, Shiwei & Hu, Xiaotao & Ran, Hui & Wang, Wenè & Hansen, Neil & Cui, Ningbo, 2020. "Optimization of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer management for spring maize in northwestern China using RZWQM2," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Nyakudya, Innocent Wadzanayi & Stroosnijder, Leo, 2014. "Effect of rooting depth, plant density and planting date on maize (Zea mays L.) yield and water use efficiency in semi-arid Zimbabwe: Modelling with AquaCrop," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 280-296.
    3. Greaves, Geneille E. & Wang, Yu-Min, 2017. "Effect of regulated deficit irrigation scheduling on water use of corn in southern Taiwan tropical environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 115-125.
    4. Chen, Zhijun & Sun, Shijun & Zhu, Zhenchuang & Jiang, Hao & Zhang, Xudong, 2019. "Assessing the effects of plant density and plastic film mulch on maize evaporation and transpiration using dual crop coefficient approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    5. Zhang, Yuanhong & Wang, Rui & Wang, Shulan & Ning, Fang & Wang, Hao & Wen, Pengfei & Li, Ao & Dong, Zhaoyang & Xu, Zonggui & Zhang, Yujiao & Li, Jun, 2019. "Effect of planting density on deep soil water and maize yield on the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Kang, Shaozhong & Gu, Binjie & Du, Taisheng & Zhang, Jianhua, 2003. "Crop coefficient and ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration of winter wheat and maize in a semi-humid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 239-254, April.
    7. Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Zhang, Lu, 2008. "Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of spring maize with plastic mulch using eddy covariance in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1214-1222, November.
    8. Wang, Yueyue & Horton, Robert & Xue, Xuzhang & Ren, Tusheng, 2021. "Partitioning evapotranspiration by measuring soil water evaporation with heat-pulse sensors and plant transpiration with sap flow gauges," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    9. Jiang, Xuelian & Kang, Shaozhong & Tong, Ling & Li, Fusheng & Li, Donghao & Ding, Risheng & Qiu, Rangjian, 2014. "Crop coefficient and evapotranspiration of grain maize modified by planting density in an arid region of northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 135-143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qin, Shujing & Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Wang, Yahui & Guo, Hui, 2019. "Transpiration of female and male parents of seed maize in northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 397-409.
    2. Feng, Yu & Hao, Weiping & Gao, Lili & Li, Haoru & Gong, Daozhi & Cui, Ningbo, 2019. "Comparison of maize water consumption at different scales between mulched and non-mulched croplands," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 315-324.
    3. Jiang, Xuelian & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Comas, Louise, 2016. "Evapotranspiration partitioning and variation of sap flow in female and male parents of maize for hybrid seed production in arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 132-141.
    4. Zhao, Yin & Mao, Xiaomin & Shukla, Manoj K. & Tian, Fei & Hou, Mengjie & Zhang, Tong & Li, Sien, 2021. "How does film mulching modify available energy, evapotranspiration, and crop coefficient during the seed–maize growing season in northwest China?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    5. Feng, Yu & Gong, Daozhi & Mei, Xurong & Hao, Weiping & Tang, Dahua & Cui, Ningbo, 2017. "Energy balance and partitioning in partial plastic mulched and non-mulched maize fields on the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 193-206.
    6. Gong, Daozhi & Mei, Xurong & Hao, Weiping & Wang, Hanbo & Caylor, Kelly K., 2017. "Comparison of ET partitioning and crop coefficients between partial plastic mulched and non-mulched maize fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 23-34.
    7. Zheng, Jing & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Zhuang, Qianlai, 2021. "Evapotranspiration partitioning and water productivity of rainfed maize under contrasting mulching conditions in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    8. Alberto, Ma. Carmelita R. & Quilty, James R. & Buresh, Roland J. & Wassmann, Reiner & Haidar, Sam & Correa, Teodoro Q. & Sandro, Joseph M., 2014. "Actual evapotranspiration and dual crop coefficients for dry-seeded rice and hybrid maize grown with overhead sprinkler irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1-12.
    9. Liu, Yi & Li, Shiqing & Chen, Fang & Yang, Shenjiao & Chen, Xinping, 2010. "Soil water dynamics and water use efficiency in spring maize (Zea mays L.) fields subjected to different water management practices on the Loess Plateau, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(5), pages 769-775, May.
    10. Zhang, Fan & Zhang, Chenglong & Yan, Zehao & Guo, Shanshan & Wang, Youzhi & Guo, Ping, 2018. "An interval nonlinear multiobjective programming model with fuzzy-interval credibility constraint for crop monthly water allocation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 123-133.
    11. Qiu, Rangjian & Liu, Chunwei & Cui, Ningbo & Wu, Youjie & Wang, Zhenchang & Li, Gen, 2019. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified Priestley-Taylor model in a rice-wheat rotation system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Jiang, Xuelian & Kang, Shaozhong & Tong, Ling & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng & Du, Taisheng, 2019. "Modeling evapotranspiration and its components of maize for seed production in an arid region of northwest China using a dual crop coefficient and multisource models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 105-117.
    13. Tang, Yikuan & Zhang, Fan & Wang, Sufen & Zhang, Xiaodong & Guo, Shanshan & Guo, Ping, 2019. "A distributed interval nonlinear multiobjective programming approach for optimal irrigation water management in an arid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 13-26.
    14. Shao, Guomin & Han, Wenting & Zhang, Huihui & Zhang, Liyuan & Wang, Yi & Zhang, Yu, 2023. "Prediction of maize crop coefficient from UAV multisensor remote sensing using machine learning methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    15. Yang, Pengju & Hu, Hongchang & Tian, Fuqiang & Zhang, Zhi & Dai, Chao, 2016. "Crop coefficient for cotton under plastic mulch and drip irrigation based on eddy covariance observation in an arid area of northwestern China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 21-30.
    16. Jiang, Shouzheng & Liang, Chuan & Cui, Ningbo & Zhao, Lu & Du, Taisheng & Hu, Xiaotao & Feng, Yu & Guan, Jing & Feng, Yi, 2019. "Impacts of climatic variables on reference evapotranspiration during growing season in Southwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 365-378.
    17. Li, Xiaojie & Kang, Shaozhong & Li, Fusheng & Jiang, Xuelian & Tong, Ling & Ding, Risheng & Li, Sien & Du, Taisheng, 2016. "Applying segmented Jarvis canopy resistance into Penman-Monteith model improves the accuracy of estimated evapotranspiration in maize for seed production with film-mulching in arid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 314-324.
    18. Rotili, Diego Hernán & Giorno, Agustín & Tognetti, Pedro Maximiliano & Maddonni, Gustavo Ángel, 2019. "Expansion of maize production in a semi-arid region of Argentina: Climatic and edaphic constraints and their implications on crop management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    19. Wang, Yunfei & Cai, Huanjie & Yu, Lianyu & Peng, Xiongbiao & Xu, Jiatun & Wang, Xiaowen, 2020. "Evapotranspiration partitioning and crop coefficient of maize in dry semi-humid climate regime," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    20. Zhang, Kefeng & Hilton, Howard W. & Greenwood, Duncan J. & Thompson, Andrew J., 2011. "A rigorous approach of determining FAO56 dual crop coefficient using soil sensor measurements and inverse modeling techniques," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 1081-1090, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5848-:d:813626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.