IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i6p3345-d519512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Criteria Approach for Prioritizing and Managing Public Investment in Urban Spaces. A Case Study in the Triple Frontier

Author

Listed:
  • Noé Villegas Flores

    (Latin American Institute of Technology, Infrastructure and Territory, Federal University of Latin American Integration, Foz do Iguaçu 85866-000, Brazil)

  • Yelinca Saldeño Madero

    (Civil Engineering Program of the Faculty of Engineering, Catholic University of Colombia, Bogota, Colombia)

  • Camilo Alberto Torres Parra

    (Civil Engineering Program of the Faculty of Engineering, Catholic University of Colombia, Bogota, Colombia)

  • Isidoro Fasolino

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy)

  • Hugo Alexander Rondón Quintana

    (Facultad del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá, Colombia)

Abstract

The aspirations of public administrations to meet quality parameters and standards in urban spaces have fostered new strategies and tools that allow users to give safety and well-being. The participation and interaction of different actors during decision-making in the context of allocation of public resources implies a significant degree of complexity when prioritizing actions in public works. The objective of the study focuses on obtaining an urban street condition index (USCI) that allows an efficient diagnosis of urban infrastructure. The study provides an innovation component for decision-making through the construction of guidelines to prioritize spending on investment in urban infrastructure. The case study has been developed in three countries, Brazil, Paraguay and Argentina (Triple Border) with the aim of drawing management guidelines during the process in public entities. The results for Brazil and Argentina present streets with satisfactory USCI. Paraguay reflects a significant lack of urban infrastructure and compliance of accessibility regulations. Regarding the city of Foz de Iguazú, it has been observed that 50% of the roads require prevailing actions to improve the mobility of the roads; 40% of these reflect reduced mobility and deterioration of urban components, configured as an urgent action, and only 10% of the roads studied reflect adequate mobility conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Noé Villegas Flores & Yelinca Saldeño Madero & Camilo Alberto Torres Parra & Isidoro Fasolino & Hugo Alexander Rondón Quintana, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Approach for Prioritizing and Managing Public Investment in Urban Spaces. A Case Study in the Triple Frontier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3345-:d:519512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3345/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3345/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harley Amado & Sara Ferreira & José Pedro Tavares & Paulo Ribeiro & Elisabete Freitas, 2020. "Pedestrian–Vehicle Interaction at Unsignalized Crosswalks: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Asplund, Disa & Pyddoke, Roger, 2020. "Optimal fares and frequencies for bus services in a small city," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Shruti Shruti & Prabhat Kumar Singh & Anurag Ohri, 2020. "Evaluating the Environmental Sustainability of Smart Cities in India: The Design and Application of the Indian Smart City Environmental Sustainability Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Younis, Fizza, 2014. "Significance of Infrastructure Investment for Economic Growth," MPRA Paper 72659, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Jun 2015.
    5. Romano Fistola & Mariano Gallo & Rosa Anna La Rocca & Francesca Russo, 2020. "The Effectiveness of Urban Cycle Lanes: From Dyscrasias to Potential Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Elena Cigu & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Anca Florentina Gavriluță (Vatamanu) & Elena Toader, 2018. "Transport Infrastructure Development, Public Performance and Long-Run Economic Growth: A Case Study for the Eu-28 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Marull, Joan & Farré, Mercè & Boix, Rafael & Palacio, Alan Bernardo & Ruiz-Forés, Núria, 2019. "Modelling urban networks sustainable progress," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 73-91.
    8. Gibson John & Rioja Felix, 2020. "The welfare effects of infrastructure investment in a heterogeneous agents economy," The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Guido Marseglia & Carlo Maria Medaglia & Francisco A. Ortega & Juan A. Mesa, 2019. "Optimal Alignments for Designing Urban Transport Systems: Application to Seville," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Arellana, Julián & Saltarín, María & Larrañaga, Ana Margarita & González, Virginia I. & Henao, César Augusto, 2020. "Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritise bicycle infrastructure investments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 310-334.
    11. Canitez, Fatih, 2020. "Transferring sustainable urban mobility policies: An institutional perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 1-12.
    12. Wu, Zhen & Chen, Ruishan & Meadows, Michael E. & Sengupta, Dhritiraj & Xu, Di, 2019. "Changing urban green spaces in Shanghai: trends, drivers and policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. D’Adamo, Idiano & Gastaldi, Massimo & Ioppolo, Giuseppe & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2022. "An analysis of Sustainable Development Goals in Italian cities: Performance measurements and policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abreo, Merlyn Natasha & Prasad, Prashant & Surin, Anila S., 2024. "Re-claiming urban neighbourhood streets for active transport – Evidence from Vasai, Maharashtra," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Villegas Flores, Noé & Cruz Salvador, Liliana Cristina & Parapinski dos Santos, Ana Carolina & Madero, Yelinca Saldeño, 2021. "A proposal to compare urban infrastructure using multi-criteria analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Investing in power grid infrastructure as a flexibility option: A DSGE assessment for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Altaf & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Muhammad Faisal Javed & Amir Mosavi, 2021. "Systematic Review of Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavement and a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-38, April.
    5. Jin Wang & Zhengyuan Shi, 2021. "Multi-Reconstruction from Points Cloud by Using a Modified Vector-Valued Allen–Cahn Equation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, June.
    6. Yaoyao Zhu & Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Morphological Transformation of Urban Open Spaces: Drivers, Trends, and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Kamila Bednarz-Okrzynska, 2024. "Transport Policy of European Union Member States in the Period 2008-2023," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1479-1489.
    8. Cai, Yangqian & Moreno, Ana Tsui, 2024. "Identifying non-universal heterogeneity of preferences of leisure cyclists for rural highway environments: A latent-class model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    9. Pyddoke, Roger, 2020. "Analysis of daily variation in bus occupancy rates for city-buses in Uppsala and optimal supply," Working Papers 2020:8, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    10. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao & Chang, Yu-Fang, 2023. "Towards net-zero emissions: Can green bond policy promote green innovation and green space?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    11. Giuseppe Cappelli & Mauro D’Apuzzo & Sofia Nardoianni & Vittorio Nicolosi, 2024. "Exploring the Influences of Safety and Energy Expenditure Parameters on Cycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Bakari, Sayef & Tiba, Sofien, 2020. "Does Agricultural Investment Still Promote Economic Growth in China? Empirical Evidence from ARDL Bounds Testing Model," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 8(4), October.
    13. Ospina, Juan P. & Duque, Juan C. & Botero-Fernández, Verónica & Montoya, Alejandro, 2022. "The maximal covering bicycle network design problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 222-236.
    14. Hua Xia & Shidong Ge & Xinyu Zhang & Gunwoo Kim & Yakai Lei & Yang Liu, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Green Infrastructure in an Agricultural Peri-Urban Area: A Case Study of Baisha District in Zhengzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    15. Zhen Yang & Weijun Gao, 2022. "Evaluating the Coordinated Development between Urban Greening and Economic Growth in Chinese Cities during 2005 to 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-25, August.
    16. Yselle F. Malah Kuete & Simplice A. Asongu, 2023. "Infrastructure Development as a Prerequisite for Structural Change in Africa," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 1386-1412, June.
    17. Enayat Mirzaei & Dominique Mignot, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of Mode Choice Decision for Utilitarian and Hedonic Trips: Evidence from Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Kelei Li & Wenpeng Du & Zhiqi Yang & Huimin Yan & Yutong Mu, 2024. "Spatio-Temporal Pattern of Urban Green Space in Chengdu Urban Center under Rapid Urbanization: From the Policy-Oriented Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, March.
    19. Chunyu Chen & Linglan Bi & Kuanfan Zhu, 2021. "Study on Spatial-Temporal Change of Urban Green Space in Yangtze River Economic Belt and Its Driving Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Yonggeng Xiong & Min Xu & Yan Zhao, 2024. "Resident Preferences for Urban Green Spaces in Response to Pandemic Public Health Emergency: A Case Study of Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3345-:d:519512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.