IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13609-d698734.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Short-Term Unit Commitment by Using Machine Learning to Cover the Uncertainty of Wind Power Forecasting

Author

Listed:
  • Diaa Salman

    (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Cyprus International University, Nicosia, Northern Cyprus, Mersin 99258, Turkey)

  • Mehmet Kusaf

    (Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Cyprus International University, Nicosia, Northern Cyprus, Mersin 99258, Turkey)

Abstract

Unit Commitment (UC) is a complicated integrational optimization method used in power systems. There is previous knowledge about the generation that has to be committed among the available ones to satisfy the load demand, reduce the generation cost and run the system smoothly. However, the UC problem has become more monotonous with the integration of renewable energy in the power network. With the growing concern towards utilizing renewable sources for producing power, this task has become important for power engineers today. The uncertainty of forecasting the output power of renewable energy will affect the solution of the UC problem and may cause serious risks to the operation and control of the power system. In power systems, wind power forecasting is an essential issue and has been studied widely so as to attain more precise wind forecasting results. In this study, a recurrent neural network (RNN) and a support vector machine (SVM) are used to forecast the day-ahead performance of the wind power which can be used for planning the day-ahead performance of the generation system by using UC optimization techniques. The RNN method is compared with the SVM approach in forecasting the wind power performance; the results show that the RNN method provides more accurate and secure results than SVM, with an average error of less than 5%. The suggested approaches are tested by applying them to the standard IEEE-30 bus test system. Moreover, a hybrid of a dynamic programming optimization technique and a genetic algorithm (DP-GA) are compared with different optimization techniques for day ahead, and the proposed technique outperformed the other methods by 93,171$ for 24 h. It is also found that the uncertainty of the RNN affects only 0.0725% of the DP-GA-optimized UC performance. This study may help the decision-makers, particularly in small power-generation firms, in planning the day-ahead performance of the electrical networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Diaa Salman & Mehmet Kusaf, 2021. "Short-Term Unit Commitment by Using Machine Learning to Cover the Uncertainty of Wind Power Forecasting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13609-:d:698734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13609/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13609/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pang, Zhihong & Niu, Fuxin & O’Neill, Zheng, 2020. "Solar radiation prediction using recurrent neural network and artificial neural network: A case study with comparisons," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 279-289.
    2. Bedi, Jatin & Toshniwal, Durga, 2019. "Deep learning framework to forecast electricity demand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1312-1326.
    3. Zhang, Yachao & Liu, Yan & Shu, Shengwen & Zheng, Feng & Huang, Zhanghao, 2021. "A data-driven distributionally robust optimization model for multi-energy coupled system considering the temporal-spatial correlation and distribution uncertainty of renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. McLarty, Dustin & Panossian, Nadia & Jabbari, Faryar & Traverso, Alberto, 2019. "Dynamic economic dispatch using complementary quadratic programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 755-764.
    5. Wei-Tzer Huang & Kai-Chao Yao & Ming-Ku Chen & Feng-Ying Wang & Cang-Hui Zhu & Yung-Ruei Chang & Yih-Der Lee & Yuan-Hsiang Ho, 2018. "Derivation and Application of a New Transmission Loss Formula for Power System Economic Dispatch," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Abdi, Hamdi, 2021. "Profit-based unit commitment problem: A review of models, methods, challenges, and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Ming, Bo & Liu, Pan & Guo, Shenglian & Cheng, Lei & Zhou, Yanlai & Gao, Shida & Li, He, 2018. "Robust hydroelectric unit commitment considering integration of large-scale photovoltaic power: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1341-1352.
    8. Furukakoi, Masahiro & Adewuyi, Oludamilare Bode & Matayoshi, Hidehito & Howlader, Abdul Motin & Senjyu, Tomonobu, 2018. "Multi objective unit commitment with voltage stability and PV uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 618-623.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Jingwei & Qin, Hui & Shen, Keyan & Yang, Yuqi & Jia, Benjun, 2024. "Study on hierarchical model of hydroelectric unit commitment based on similarity schedule and quadratic optimization approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    2. Adam Krechowicz & Maria Krechowicz & Katarzyna Poczeta, 2022. "Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Electricity Production from Renewable Energy Sources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-41, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiang, Sufan & Gao, Shan & Pan, Guangsheng & Zhao, Xin & Liu, Yu & Guo, Yasen & Wang, Sicheng, 2020. "A novel robust security constrained unit commitment model considering HVDC regulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    2. Gao, Yuan & Miyata, Shohei & Akashi, Yasunori, 2022. "Interpretable deep learning models for hourly solar radiation prediction based on graph neural network and attention," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    3. Wadim Strielkowski & Andrey Vlasov & Kirill Selivanov & Konstantin Muraviev & Vadim Shakhnov, 2023. "Prospects and Challenges of the Machine Learning and Data-Driven Methods for the Predictive Analysis of Power Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-31, May.
    4. Lei, Kaixuan & Chang, Jianxia & Wang, Xuebin & Guo, Aijun & Wang, Yimin & Ren, Chengqing, 2023. "Peak shaving and short-term economic operation of hydro-wind-PV hybrid system considering the uncertainty of wind and PV power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    5. Zepter, Jan Martin & Weibezahn, Jens, 2019. "Unit commitment under imperfect foresight – The impact of stochastic photovoltaic generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C), pages 336-349.
    6. Qing, Ke & Huang, Qi & Du, Yuefang & Jiang, Lin & Bamisile, Olusola & Hu, Weihao, 2023. "Distributionally robust unit commitment with an adjustable uncertainty set and dynamic demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    7. Hu, Jinhong & Yang, Jiebin & He, Xianghui & Zhao, Zhigao & Yang, Jiandong, 2023. "Transient analysis of a hydropower plant with a super-long headrace tunnel during load acceptance: Instability mechanism and measurement verification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    8. Feng, Zhong-kai & Niu, Wen-jing & Wang, Wen-chuan & Zhou, Jian-zhong & Cheng, Chun-tian, 2019. "A mixed integer linear programming model for unit commitment of thermal plants with peak shaving operation aspect in regional power grid lack of flexible hydropower energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 618-629.
    9. Younes Zahraoui & Tarmo Korõtko & Argo Rosin & Saad Mekhilef & Mehdi Seyedmahmoudian & Alex Stojcevski & Ibrahim Alhamrouni, 2024. "AI Applications to Enhance Resilience in Power Systems and Microgrids—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-35, June.
    10. Lim, Juin Yau & Safder, Usman & How, Bing Shen & Ifaei, Pouya & Yoo, Chang Kyoo, 2021. "Nationwide sustainable renewable energy and Power-to-X deployment planning in South Korea assisted with forecasting model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    11. Saima Akhtar & Sulman Shahzad & Asad Zaheer & Hafiz Sami Ullah & Heybet Kilic & Radomir Gono & Michał Jasiński & Zbigniew Leonowicz, 2023. "Short-Term Load Forecasting Models: A Review of Challenges, Progress, and the Road Ahead," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-29, May.
    12. Zhou, Yuzhou & Zhao, Jiexing & Zhai, Qiaozhu, 2021. "100% renewable energy: A multi-stage robust scheduling approach for cascade hydropower system with wind and photovoltaic power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    13. Loau Al-Bahrani & Mehdi Seyedmahmoudian & Ben Horan & Alex Stojcevski, 2021. "Solving the Real Power Limitations in the Dynamic Economic Dispatch of Large-Scale Thermal Power Units under the Effects of Valve-Point Loading and Ramp-Rate Limitations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, January.
    14. Lu, Hongfang & Ma, Xin & Ma, Minda, 2021. "A hybrid multi-objective optimizer-based model for daily electricity demand prediction considering COVID-19," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    15. Ahmad, Tanveer & Chen, Huanxin, 2019. "Deep learning for multi-scale smart energy forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 98-112.
    16. Kong, Xiangfei & Du, Xinyu & Xue, Guixiang & Xu, Zhijie, 2023. "Multi-step short-term solar radiation prediction based on empirical mode decomposition and gated recurrent unit optimized via an attention mechanism," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    17. Mohammad Masih Sediqi & Mohammed Elsayed Lotfy & Abdul Matin Ibrahimi & Tomonobu Senjyu & Narayanan. K, 2019. "Stochastic Unit Commitment and Optimal Power Trading Incorporating PV Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Cheng, Qian & Liu, Pan & Xia, Qian & Cheng, Lei & Ming, Bo & Zhang, Wei & Xu, Weifeng & Zheng, Yalian & Han, Dongyang & Xia, Jun, 2023. "An analytical method to evaluate curtailment of hydro–photovoltaic hybrid energy systems and its implication under climate change," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    19. Jin, Xiaoyu & Liu, Benxi & Liao, Shengli & Cheng, Chuntian & Zhang, Yi & Zhao, Zhipeng & Lu, Jia, 2022. "Wasserstein metric-based two-stage distributionally robust optimization model for optimal daily peak shaving dispatch of cascade hydroplants under renewable energy uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    20. Ibrahim, Muhammad Sohail & Dong, Wei & Yang, Qiang, 2020. "Machine learning driven smart electric power systems: Current trends and new perspectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13609-:d:698734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.