IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i24p13588-d698136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Techno-Economic Evaluation of Hydrogen Production via Gasification of Vacuum Residue Integrated with Dry Methane Reforming

Author

Listed:
  • Fayez Nasir Al-Rowaili

    (Chemical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
    Saudi Aramco, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia)

  • Siddig S. Khalafalla

    (Chemical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

  • Aqil Jamal

    (Saudi Aramco, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia)

  • Dhaffer S. Al-Yami

    (Saudi Aramco, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia)

  • Umer Zahid

    (Chemical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
    Interdisciplinary Research Center for Membranes & Water Security, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

  • Eid M. Al-Mutairi

    (Chemical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
    Interdisciplinary Research Center for Refining and Advanced Chemicals, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

The continuous rise of global carbon emissions demands the utilization of fossil fuels in a sustainable way. Owing to various forms of emissions, our environment conditions might be affected, necessitating more focus of scientists and researchers to upgrade oil processing to more efficient manner. Gasification is a potential technology that can convert fossil fuels to produce clean and environmentally friendly hydrogen fuel in an economical manner. Therefore, this study analyzed and examined it critically. In this study, two different routes for the produc-tion of high-purity hydrogen from vacuum residue while minimizing the carbon emissions were proposed. The first route (Case I) studied the gasification of heavy vacuum residue (VR) in series with dry methane reforming (DMR). The second route studied the gasification of VR in parallel integration with DMR (Case II). After investigating both processes, a brief comparison was made between the two routes of hydrogen production in terms of their CO 2 emissions, en-ergy efficiency, energy consumption, and environmental and economic impacts. In this study, the two vacuum-residue-to-hydrogen (VRTH) processes were simulated using Aspen Plus for a hydrogen production capacity of 50 t/h with 99.9 wt.% purity. The results showed that Case II offered a process energy efficiency of 57.8%, which was slightly higher than that of Case I. The unit cost of the hydrogen product for Case II was USD 15.95 per metric ton of hydrogen, which was almost 9% lower than that of Case I. In terms of the environmental analysis, both cases had comparably low carbon emissions of around 8.3 kg of CO 2 /kg of hydrogen produced; with such high purity, the hydrogen could be used for production of other products further downstream or for industrial applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Fayez Nasir Al-Rowaili & Siddig S. Khalafalla & Aqil Jamal & Dhaffer S. Al-Yami & Umer Zahid & Eid M. Al-Mutairi, 2021. "Techno-Economic Evaluation of Hydrogen Production via Gasification of Vacuum Residue Integrated with Dry Methane Reforming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-11, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13588-:d:698136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13588/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/24/13588/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siddig S. Khalafalla & Umer Zahid & Abdul Gani Abdul Jameel & Usama Ahmed & Feraih S. Alenazey & Chul-Jin Lee, 2020. "Conceptual Design Development of Coal-to-Methanol Process with Carbon Capture and Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Ishaq, H. & Dincer, I., 2021. "Comparative assessment of renewable energy-based hydrogen production methods," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Rudra, Souman & Tesfagaber, Yohannes Kifle, 2019. "Future district heating plant integrated with municipal solid waste (MSW) gasification for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 881-892.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdur Rawoof, Salma Aathika & Kumar, P. Senthil & Vo, Dai-Viet N. & Devaraj, Thiruselvi & Subramanian, Sivanesan, 2021. "Biohythane as a high potential fuel from anaerobic digestion of organic waste: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Pashchenko, Dmitry, 2023. "Hydrogen-rich gas as a fuel for the gas turbines: A pathway to lower CO2 emission," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Mika Fabricius & Daniel Øland Tarp & Thomas Wehl Rasmussen & Ahmad Arabkoohsar, 2020. "Utilization of Excess Production of Waste-Fired CHP Plants for District Cooling Supply, an Effective Solution for a Serious Challenge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Song, Yuhang & Tian, Ye & Zhou, Xiong & Liang, Shimang & Li, Xuanyu & Yang, Yu & Yuan, Liang, 2021. "Simulation of air-steam gasification of pine sawdust in an updraft gasification system for production of hydrogen-rich producer gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Sanjay Kumar Kar & Akhoury Sudhir Kumar Sinha & Sidhartha Harichandan & Rohit Bansal & Marriyappan Sivagnanam Balathanigaimani, 2023. "Hydrogen economy in India: A status review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), January.
    6. Čespiva, J. & Skřínský, J. & Vereš, J. & Wnukowski, M. & Serenčíšová, J. & Ochodek, T., 2023. "Solid recovered fuel gasification in sliding bed reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    7. Bhandari, Ramchandra & Shah, Ronak Rakesh, 2021. "Hydrogen as energy carrier: Techno-economic assessment of decentralized hydrogen production in Germany," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 915-931.
    8. Majed A. Alotaibi & Ali M. Eltamaly, 2021. "A Smart Strategy for Sizing of Hybrid Renewable Energy System to Supply Remote Loads in Saudi Arabia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, October.
    9. Mustapha D. Ibrahim & Fatima A. S. Binofai & Maha O. A. Mohamad, 2022. "Transition to Low-Carbon Hydrogen Energy System in the UAE: Sector Efficiency and Hydrogen Energy Production Efficiency Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Wu, Yunna & Liu, Fangtong & Wu, Junhao & He, Jiaming & Xu, Minjia & Zhou, Jianli, 2022. "Barrier identification and analysis framework to the development of offshore wind-to-hydrogen projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    11. Tabibian, Seyed Shayan & Sharifzadeh, Mahdi, 2023. "Statistical and analytical investigation of methanol applications, production technologies, value-chain and economy with a special focus on renewable methanol," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    12. Hunt, Julian David & Nascimento, Andreas & Nascimento, Nazem & Vieira, Lara Werncke & Romero, Oldrich Joel, 2022. "Possible pathways for oil and gas companies in a sustainable future: From the perspective of a hydrogen economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    13. Hren, Robert & Vujanović, Annamaria & Van Fan, Yee & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Krajnc, Damjan & Čuček, Lidija, 2023. "Hydrogen production, storage and transport for renewable energy and chemicals: An environmental footprint assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    14. Willie Doaemo & Sahil Dhiman & Alexander Borovskis & Wenlan Zhang & Sumedha Bhat & Srishti Jaipuria & Mirzi Betasolo, 2021. "Assessment of municipal solid waste management system in Lae City, Papua New Guinea in the context of sustainable development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18509-18539, December.
    15. Su, Yue & Li, Jingfa & Yu, Bo & Zhao, Yanlin, 2022. "Numerical investigation on the leakage and diffusion characteristics of hydrogen-blended natural gas in a domestic kitchen," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 899-916.
    16. Olabi, A.G. & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali, 2022. "Renewable energy and climate change," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    17. Nielsen, Tore Bach & Lund, Henrik & Østergaard, Poul Alberg & Duic, Neven & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2021. "Perspectives on energy efficiency and smart energy systems from the 5th SESAAU2019 conference," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    18. Lin, Haiyang & Wu, Qiuwei & Chen, Xinyu & Yang, Xi & Guo, Xinyang & Lv, Jiajun & Lu, Tianguang & Song, Shaojie & McElroy, Michael, 2021. "Economic and technological feasibility of using power-to-hydrogen technology under higher wind penetration in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 569-580.
    19. Tokmurzin, Diyar & Kuspangaliyeva, Botagoz & Aimbetov, Berik & Abylkhani, Bexultan & Inglezakis, Vassilis & Anthony, Edward J. & Sarbassov, Yerbol, 2020. "Characterization of solid char produced from pyrolysis of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste, high volatile coal and their blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    20. Song, Haoran & Zhong, Zheng & Lin, Baiquan, 2023. "Chemical dissolution of minerals in anthracite after supercritical carbon dioxide immersion: Considering mechanical damage and enhanced porosity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:24:p:13588-:d:698136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.