IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13100-d688681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enclave-Reinforced Inequality during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from University Campus Lockdowns in Wuhan, China

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng Sun

    (Center of Hubei Cooperative Innovation for Emissions Trading System, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan 430205, China
    School of Low Carbon Economics, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan 430205, China)

  • Yaxuan Xiong

    (School of Low Carbon Economics, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan 430205, China)

  • Zhiqin Wu

    (School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK)

  • Jie Li

    (School of Low Carbon Economics, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan 430205, China)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted urban life and created spatial and social inequalities in cities. The impacts of lifting full lockdown restrictions once fast-spreading and community-acquired infection waves were under control are still not fully understood. This study aims to explore spatial inequality reinforced in the intervals between the waves of infection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Enclave-reinforced inequality resulting from enclave-based lockdown policies in Chinese cities was investigated through an analysis of the impacts of university campus enclave closures on the accessibility and crowdedness of urban green spaces. Using a modified two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) and inversed 2SFCA (i2SFCA) method, accessibility and crowdedness were calculated and compared under two different scenarios. Additionally, the Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient, and Theil index were used to measure and compare intra-city global and local inequalities under each scenario. The results indicate that the lockdown of university campus enclaves decreased the supply of urban green spaces. Campus closures not only exacerbated the unequal distribution of urban green space, but also reduced the inequality of crowdedness in urban parks due to increased crowdedness in parks near the closed enclaves. Moreover, both accessibility and crowdedness worsened when the calculations were weighted for population size and the total supply of green space. Enclave-based lockdown in cities reinforced spatial inequality, and it is highly complex and has multidimensional impacts on urban inequalities and environmental injustice which should be considered by urban planners and decision-makers hoping to create healthy, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable cities in the “new normal” of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng Sun & Yaxuan Xiong & Zhiqin Wu & Jie Li, 2021. "Enclave-Reinforced Inequality during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from University Campus Lockdowns in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13100-:d:688681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13100/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13100/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ugolini, Francesca & Massetti, Luciano & Pearlmutter, David & Sanesi, Giovanni, 2021. "Usage of urban green space and related feelings of deprivation during the COVID-19 lockdown: Lessons learned from an Italian case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. van Wee, Bert, 2016. "Accessible accessibility research challenges," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 9-16.
    3. Tianke Zhu & Xigang Zhu & Jian Jin, 2021. "Grid Governance in China under the COVID-19 Outbreak: Changing Neighborhood Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Delbosc, Alexa & Currie, Graham, 2011. "Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1252-1259.
    5. Fran Tonkiss, 2020. "City government and urban inequalities," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1-2), pages 286-301, March.
    6. Michele Acuto & Shaun Larcom & Roger Keil & Mehrnaz Ghojeh & Tom Lindsay & Chiara Camponeschi & Susan Parnell, 2020. "Seeing COVID-19 through an urban lens," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(12), pages 977-978, December.
    7. Panagiotopoulos, George & Kaliampakos, Dimitris, 2021. "Location quotient-based travel costs for determining accessibility changes," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Lope, Dinah Jane & Dolgun, Anil, 2020. "Measuring the inequality of accessible trams in Melbourne," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Ole B. Jensen, 2021. "Pandemic disruption, extended bodies, and elastic situations - Reflections on COVID-19 and Mobilities," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 66-80, January.
    10. Zhang, Mengzhu & Zhao, Pengjun, 2021. "Literature review on urban transport equity in transitional China: From empirical studies to universal knowledge," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    11. Shauna Brail, 2021. "Patterns amidst the turmoil: COVID-19 and cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 598-603, May.
    12. Mark Kleinman, 2020. "Policy challenges for the post-pandemic city," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(7), pages 1136-1139, September.
    13. Eisenmann, Christine & Nobis, Claudia & Kolarova, Viktoriya & Lenz, Barbara & Winkler, Christian, 2021. "Transport mode use during the COVID-19 lockdown period in Germany: The car became more important, public transport lost ground," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 60-67.
    14. Noel B. Salazar, 2021. "Existential vs. essential mobilities: insights from before, during and after a crisis," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 20-34, January.
    15. David Simon & Angeles Arano & Mariana Cammisa & Beth Perry & Sara Pettersson & Jan Riise & Sandra Valencia & Michael Oloko & Tarun Sharma & Yutika Vora & Warren Smit, 2021. "Cities coping with COVID-19," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1-2), pages 129-170, March.
    16. Myounggu Kang & Yeol Choi & Jeongseob Kim & Kwan Ok Lee & Sugie Lee & In Kwon Park & Jiyoung Park & Ilwon Seo, 2020. "COVID-19 impact on city and region: what’s next after lockdown?," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 297-315, July.
    17. Andy Pike & Stuart Dawley & John Tomaney, 2010. "Resilience, adaptation and adaptability," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 3(1), pages 59-70.
    18. Michael Batty, 2020. "The Coronavirus crisis: What will the post-pandemic city look like?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(4), pages 547-552, June.
    19. Eric J. Miller, 2018. "Accessibility: measurement and application in transportation planning," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 551-555, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuan Sun & Zhu Wang & Zhi Qiu & Congyue Zhou, 2022. "Multi-Impacts of Spatial Self-Policing during COVID-19: Evidence from a Chinese University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shauna Brail, 2021. "Patterns amidst the turmoil: COVID-19 and cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 598-603, May.
    2. Jean Ryan, 2020. "Examining the Process of Modal Choice for Everyday Travel Among Older People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Guo, Shuocheng & Kontou, Eleftheria, 2021. "Disparities and equity issues in electric vehicles rebate allocation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Gabriella Vitorino Guimarães & Tálita Floriano Santos & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes & Jorge Eliécer Córdoba Maquilón & Marcelino Aurélio Vieira da Silva, 2020. "Assessment for the Social Sustainability and Equity under the Perspective of Accessibility to Jobs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Ryan, Jean & Martens, Karel, 2023. "Defining and implementing a sufficient level of accessibility: What’s stopping us?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Li, Aoyong & Huang, Yizhe & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "An approach to imputing destination activities for inclusion in measures of bicycle accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Apantri Peungnumsai & Hiroyuki Miyazaki & Apichon Witayangkurn & Sohee Minsun Kim, 2020. "A Grid-Based Spatial Analysis for Detecting Supply–Demand Gaps of Public Transports: A Case Study of the Bangkok Metropolitan Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-27, December.
    8. Hamidi, Zahra, 2021. "Decomposing cycling potentials employing the motility framework," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Alexandre Moragues & Joana Maria Seguí-Pons & Antoni Colom Fernández & Maurici Ruiz-Pérez, 2023. "Analysis of Road Accessibility by Residents and Tourists to Public Hospitals in Mallorca (Balearic Islands, Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Mingzhu Song & Kaiping Wang & Yi Zhang & Meng Li & He Qi & Yi Zhang, 2020. "Impact Evaluation of Bike-Sharing on Bicycling Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Ryan, Jean & Pereira, Rafael H.M., 2021. "What are we missing when we measure accessibility? Comparing calculated and self-reported accounts among older people," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Alberto Dianin & Elisa Ravazzoli & Georg Hauger, 2021. "Implications of Autonomous Vehicles for Accessibility and Transport Equity: A Framework Based on Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Ryan, Jean & Pereira, Rafael H.M. & Andersson, Magnus, 2023. "Accessibility and space-time differences in when and how different groups (choose to) travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    14. Max Nathan & Henry Overman, 2020. "Will coronavirus cause a big city exodus?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(9), pages 1537-1542, November.
    15. Danial Owen & Daniel Arribas-Bel & Francisco Rowe, 2023. "Tracking the Transit Divide: A Multilevel Modelling Approach of Urban Inequalities and Train Ridership Disparities in Chicago," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Guzman, Luis A. & Oviedo, Daniel & Rivera, Carlos, 2017. "Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogotá region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 236-246.
    17. Hamidi, Zahra & Camporeale, Rosalia & Caggiani, Leonardo, 2019. "Inequalities in access to bike-and-ride opportunities: Findings for the city of Malmö," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 673-688.
    18. Guzman, Luis A. & Oviedo, Daniel, 2018. "Accessibility, affordability and equity: Assessing ‘pro-poor’ public transport subsidies in Bogotá," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 37-51.
    19. Sharma, Ishant & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Golias, Mihalis M. & Welch, Timothy F. & Cherry, Christopher R., 2020. "Equity of transit connectivity in Tennessee cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    20. Caterina Malandri & Luca Mantecchini & Filippo Paganelli & Maria Nadia Postorino, 2021. "Public Transport Network Vulnerability and Delay Distribution among Travelers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13100-:d:688681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.