IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i18p10075-d631738.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Romanian Mobile Commerce Companies on Developing Green Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Violeta Mihaela Dincă

    (UNESCO Department for Business Administration, Faculty of Business Administration in Foreign Languages, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010375 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Anca Bogdan

    (UNESCO Department for Business Administration, Faculty of Business Administration in Foreign Languages, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010375 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cristinel Vasiliu

    (Department of Business, Consumer Sciences and Quality Management, Faculty of Business and Tourism, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010374 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Francisca Zamfir

    (Doctoral School in Business Administration, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, 010371 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Lately, concern for green innovation has expanded in the business environment and many companies see it as a helpful element to gain competitive advantage. Due to the strains of maintaining sustainable businesses, mobile commerce companies are propelled to build up their own green innovation programs and harmonize them with the firm’s management programs. The central scope of this research is to examine the drivers for green innovation within a range of Romania-based mobile commerce companies that operate in different industries. With the aim of identifying the factors that determine the development of green innovation, a conceptual model has been conceived. The dependent variable within the model is the action of the company’s management to develop green innovation. Four independent types of variable structures that have an impact on the development of green innovation in mobile commerce firms were distinguished. The four categories of constructs are business environmental factors (1), green training (2), green supplier development (3), and technological factors (4). An online survey tested the model based on the responses of senior level management representatives from 182 Romanian mobile commerce companies from Bucharest. The validity of the model was fulfilled though factor analysis and reliability tests for the data; a logistic regression analysis was also used to test the research hypotheses. The research revealed that green training embodies the fundamental element enhancing green innovation among Romanian mobile commerce companies. This article benefits both academia and business. Firms could be inspired by the results of this paper to broaden the level of green innovation throughout the Romanian business environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Violeta Mihaela Dincă & Anca Bogdan & Cristinel Vasiliu & Francisca Zamfir, 2021. "The Influence of Romanian Mobile Commerce Companies on Developing Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10075-:d:631738
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10075/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/18/10075/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Truong, Yann & McColl, Rod, 2011. "Intrinsic motivations, self-esteem, and luxury goods consumption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 555-561.
    2. B. Ageron & A. Gunasekaran & A. Spalanzani, 2012. "Sustainable supply management : an empirical study," Post-Print halshs-00740499, HAL.
    3. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    4. Vasile Dinu & Sorin Paul Lazar & Iustin Atanasiu Pop, 2021. "Factors That Influence the Adoption of the Internet of Things in Tourism by Romanian Consumers," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(57), pages 360-360.
    5. Alina-Mihaela Dima & Claudia-Elena Țuclea & Diana-Maria Vrânceanu & Gabriela Țigu, 2019. "Sustainable Social and Individual Implications of Telework: A New Insight into the Romanian Labor Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-12, June.
    6. Albort-Morant, Gema & Leal-Millán, Antonio & Cepeda-Carrión, Gabriel, 2016. "The antecedents of green innovation performance: A model of learning and capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4912-4917.
    7. Chieh-Yu Lin & Yi-Hui Ho, 2011. "Determinants of Green Practice Adoption for Logistics Companies in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 67-83, January.
    8. Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Giudice, Manlio Del & Chierici, Roberto & Graziano, Domenico, 2020. "Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    9. Ageron, Blandine & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Spalanzani, Alain, 2012. "Sustainable supply management: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 168-182.
    10. Ertz, Myriam & Karakas, Fahri & Sarigöllü, Emine, 2016. "Exploring pro-environmental behaviors of consumers: An analysis of contextual factors, attitude, and behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 3971-3980.
    11. Tjur, Tue, 2009. "Coefficients of Determination in Logistic Regression Models—A New Proposal: The Coefficient of Discrimination," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 63(4), pages 366-372.
    12. Elena‐Mădălina Vătămănescu & Vlad‐Andrei Alexandru & Violeta Mihaela Dincă & Bogdan Gabriel Nistoreanu, 2018. "A Social Systems Approach to Self‐assessed Health and Its Determinants in the Digital Era," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 357-368, July.
    13. Pascal Paillé & Yang Chen & Olivier Boiral & Jiafei Jin, 2014. "The Impact of Human Resource Management on Environmental Performance: An Employee-Level Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 451-466, May.
    14. Cristinel Vasiliu & Mihai Felea & Irina Albastroiu & Mihaela Dobrea, 2016. "Exploring Multi-Channel Shopping Behavior Towards It & C Products, Based on Business Students Opinions," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(41), pages 184-184, February.
    15. Alexandra ZBUCHEA & Elena-Madalina VĂTĂMĂNESCU & Florina PÎNZARU, 2016. "M-commerce – Facts and Forecasts. A Comparative Analysis within a Triad Framework: India, Romania, and the United States," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 4(3), pages 387-408, September.
    16. Sun, Huaping & Edziah, Bless Kofi & Sun, Chuanwang & Kporsu, Anthony Kwaku, 2019. "Institutional quality, green innovation and energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dincă Violeta Mihaela, 2022. "Emotional intelligence – a Romanian qualitative study," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 15-21, August.
    2. Violeta Mihaela Dinca & Simona Moagar-Poladian & Tanase Stamule & Puiu Nistoreanu, 2023. "The REPowerEU Plan and the Transition to Green Energy in Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(64), pages 676-676, August.
    3. Sandu Mihai, 2023. "Use of Knowledge Management in Companies – An Overview of Energy Consumption Strategy on Short Term," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1251-1263, July.
    4. Violeta Mihaela Dincă & Mihail Busu & Zoltan Nagy-Bege, 2022. "Determinants with Impact on Romanian Consumers’ Energy-Saving Habits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Elena Dinu & Elena-Mădălina Vătămănescu & Roxana-Maria Stăneiu & Mihaela Rusu, 2023. "An Exploratory Study Linking Intellectual Capital and Technology Management towards Innovative Performance in KIBS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Grasu Stelian & Popp Ruxandra Mădălina, 2023. "An Overview of the European Union Legislation Regarding the Natural Gas Market," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 411-418, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Cuevas-Romo, Ana & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Díaz-Acevedo, Natalie & Albores, Pavel & Despoudi, Stella & Malesios, Chrisovalantis & Dey, Prasanta, 2022. "The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    2. Li, Qian & Xue, Qiuzhi & Truong, Yann & Xiong, Jie, 2018. "MNCs' industrial linkages and environmental spillovers in emerging economies: The case of China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 346-355.
    3. Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Rafael Caliani Janeiro & Ana Beatriz Lopes Sousa Jabbour & Jose Alcides Gobbo Junior & Manoel Henrique Salgado & Daniel Jugend, 2020. "Social aspects of sustainable supply chains: unveiling potential relationships in the Brazilian context," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 327-341, July.
    4. Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto & Esposito, Emilio & Passaro, Renato & Shashi,, 2021. "Determinants of the transition towards circular economy in SMEs: A sustainable supply chain management perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    5. Shatha M. Obeidat & Anas A. Al Bakri & Said Elbanna, 2020. "Leveraging “Green” Human Resource Practices to Enable Environmental and Organizational Performance: Evidence from the Qatari Oil and Gas Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 371-388, June.
    6. Aida Ahmed Zahrani, 2022. "Team Creativity and Green Human Resource Management Practices’ Mediating Roles in Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Müller, Jochem, 2023. "Inspirational Intuition – Bridge to Future Viability," EconStor Research Reports 268392, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Asif Khan & Chih-Cheng Chen & Kwanrat Suanpong & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Santhaya Kittikowit & Shih-Chih Chen, 2021. "The Impact of CSR on Sustainable Innovation Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Second-Order Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    9. Xia Zhao & Ning Li & Liang Song, 2019. "Coordination of a Socially Responsible Two-Stage Supply Chain Under Random Demand," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(05), pages 1-27, October.
    10. Khan, Nawab Ali & Azhar, Mohd & Rahman, Mohd Nayyer & Akhtar, Mohd Junaid, 2022. "Scale development and validation for usage of social networking sites during COVID-19," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih & Ahmed Hasanein & Ibrahim Elshaer, 2020. "Influences of Green Human Resources Management on Environmental Performance in Small Lodging Enterprises: The Role of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Jamalnia, Aboozar & Gong, Yu & Govindan, Kannan, 2023. "Sub-supplier's sustainability management in multi-tier supply chains: A systematic literature review on the contingency variables, and a conceptual framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    13. M. Ángeles Sanfiel-Fumero & Yaiza Armas-Cruz & Olga González-Morales, 2017. "Sustainability of the tourist supply chain and governance in an insular biosphere reserve destination: the perspective of tourist accommodation," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(7), pages 1256-1274, July.
    14. Yong Liu & Bing-ting Quan & Jiao Li & Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest, 2018. "A Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism with Cost Sharing of Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Lixin Shen & Kannan Govindan & Madan Shankar, 2015. "Evaluation of Barriers of Corporate Social Responsibility Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process under a Fuzzy Environment—A Textile Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-22, March.
    16. I Ketut Astawa & I Ketut Budarma & Cokorda Istri Sri Widhari & Anak Agung Putri Suardani, 2020. "Green Supply Chain Management and Operational Performance: A Case Study at 5-Star Hotel in Bali," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 10(1), pages 478-487, August.
    17. Guo Li & Ming K. Lim & Zhaohua Wang, 2020. "Stakeholders, green manufacturing, and practice performance: empirical evidence from Chinese fashion businesses," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 961-982, July.
    18. Kannan, Devika & Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa & Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta, 2014. "Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 432-447.
    19. Sebastian Kot, 2018. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in Small and Medium Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Zhifeng Wu & Senjing Zhai & Jiangtao Hong & Yibin Zhang & Keren Shi, 2018. "Building Sustainable Supply Chains for Organizations Based on QFD: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:18:p:10075-:d:631738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.