IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i17p9692-d624726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Data-Efficient Approach for Evacuation Demand Generation and Dissipation Prediction in Urban Rail Transit System

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoqing Dai

    (Transport Planning and Research Institute, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100028, China
    Laboratory for Traffic & Transport Planning Digitalization, Beijing 100028, China)

  • Han Qiu

    (Meituan, Beijing 100000, China)

  • Lijun Sun

    (The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201804, China)

Abstract

Predicting evacuation demand, including its generation and dissipation process, for urban rail transit systems under disruptions, such as line and station closure, often requires comprehensive historical data recorded under homogeneous situations. However, data under disruptions are hard to collect due to various reasons, which makes traditional methods impractical in evacuation demand prediction. To address this problem from the modeling perspective, we develop a data-efficient approach to predict evacuation demand for urban rail transit systems under disruptions. Our model-based approach mainly uses historical data obtained from the natural state, when no shocks take place. We first formulate the mathematical representation of the evacuation demand for every type of urban rail transit station. Input variables in this step are location features related to the station under the disruption, as well as an origin–destination matrix under the natural state. Then, based on these mathematical expressions, we develop a simulation system to imitate the spatio-temporal evolution of evacuation demand within the whole network under disruptions. The transport capacity drop under disruptions is used to describe the disruption situation. Several typical scenarios from the Shanghai metro network are used as examples to implement the proposed method. The results show that our method is able to predict the generation and dissipation processes of evacuation demand, as well model how severely stations will be affected by given disruptions. One general observation we draw from the results is that the most vulnerable stations under disruption, where the locations peak evacuation demand occurs, are mainly turn-back stations, closed stations, and the transfer stations near closed stations. This paper provides new insight into evacuation demand prediction under disruptions. It could be used by transport authorities to better respond to the urban rail transit system disruption.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoqing Dai & Han Qiu & Lijun Sun, 2021. "A Data-Efficient Approach for Evacuation Demand Generation and Dissipation Prediction in Urban Rail Transit System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9692-:d:624726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9692/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/17/9692/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saadatseresht, Mohammad & Mansourian, Ali & Taleai, Mohammad, 2009. "Evacuation planning using multiobjective evolutionary optimization approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 305-314, October.
    2. Chikaraishi, Makoto & Garg, Prateek & Varghese, Varun & Yoshizoe, Kazuki & Urata, Junji & Shiomi, Yasuhiro & Watanabe, Ryuki, 2020. "On the possibility of short-term traffic prediction during disaster with machine learning approaches: An exploratory analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 91-104.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fang, Zhixiang & Zong, Xinlu & Li, Qingquan & Li, Qiuping & Xiong, Shengwu, 2011. "Hierarchical multi-objective evacuation routing in stadium using ant colony optimization approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 443-451.
    2. Uchida, Kenetsu, 2012. "A model evaluating effect of disaster warning issuance conditions on “cry wolf syndrome” in the case of a landslide," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 530-537.
    3. Sandeep Kumar Sood & Keshav Singh Rawat, 2021. "A scientometric analysis of ICT-assisted disaster management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(3), pages 2863-2881, April.
    4. Li, Lingfeng & Jin, Mingzhou & Zhang, Li, 2011. "Sheltering network planning and management with a case in the Gulf Coast region," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 431-440, June.
    5. Laijun Zhao & Huiyong Li & Yan Sun & Rongbing Huang & Qingmi Hu & Jiajia Wang & Fei Gao, 2017. "Planning Emergency Shelters for Urban Disaster Resilience: An Integrated Location-Allocation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Luka Matijević & Marko Đurasević & Domagoj Jakobović, 2023. "A Variable Neighborhood Search Method with a Tabu List and Local Search for Optimizing Routing in Trucks in Maritime Ports," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Goerigk, Marc & Deghdak, Kaouthar & Heßler, Philipp, 2014. "A comprehensive evacuation planning model and genetic solution algorithm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 82-97.
    8. Mojahid Saeed Osman & Bala Ram, 2017. "Distributed scheduling approach for dynamic evacuation networks," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 554-569, November.
    9. Qingyan Ning & Maosheng Li, 2022. "Modeling Pedestrian Detour Behavior By-Passing Conflict Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Fang, Zhixiang & Tu, Wei & Li, Qingquan & Li, Qiuping, 2011. "A multi-objective approach to scheduling joint participation with variable space and time preferences and opportunities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 623-634.
    11. Ekinci, Esra & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Sarma, P.R.S. & Sezer, Muruvvet Deniz & Ozbiltekin-Pala, Melisa, 2022. "Resilience and complexity measurement for energy efficient global supply chains in disruptive events," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    12. Peiyu Zhang & Yankui Liu & Guoqing Yang & Guoqing Zhang, 2022. "A multi-objective distributionally robust model for sustainable last mile relief network design problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 309(2), pages 689-730, February.
    13. Fatemeh Sabouhi & Ali Bozorgi-Amiri & Mohammad Moshref-Javadi & Mehdi Heydari, 2019. "An integrated routing and scheduling model for evacuation and commodity distribution in large-scale disaster relief operations: a case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 643-677, December.
    14. Mahdi Hashemi & Ali Alesheikh, 2013. "GIS: agent-based modeling and evaluation of an earthquake-stricken area with a case study in Tehran, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(3), pages 1895-1917, December.
    15. Cheng, Yung-Hsiang & Liang, Zheng-Xian, 2014. "A strategic planning model for the railway system accident rescue problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 75-96.
    16. Xiujuan Zhao & Peng Du & Jianguo Chen & Dapeng Yu & Wei Xu & Shiyan Lou & Hongyong Yuan & Kuai Peng Ip, 2020. "A Typhoon Shelter Selection and Evacuee Allocation Model: A Case Study of Macao (SAR), China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, April.
    17. Shengjie Long & Dezhi Zhang & Shuangyan Li & Shuanglin Li, 2023. "Two-Stage Multi-Objective Stochastic Model on Patient Transfer and Relief Distribution in Lockdown Area of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    18. Sotelo-Salas, Christian & Monardes-Concha, Carlos A. & Pérez-Galarce, Francisco & Santa González, Rosemarie, 2024. "A multi-objective optimization model for planning emergency shelters after a tsunami," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    19. Kelle, Peter & Schneider, Helmut & Yi, Huizhi, 2014. "Decision alternatives between expected cost minimization and worst case scenario in emergency supply – Second revision," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 250-260.
    20. Kimms, A. & Maiwald, M., 2018. "Bi-objective safe and resilient urban evacuation planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1122-1136.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:17:p:9692-:d:624726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.