IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p9289-d616944.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability of Management Decisions in a Digital Logistics Network

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey Evgenievich Barykin

    (Graduate School of Service and Trade, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaya, 29, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Larisa Nikolaevna Borisoglebskaya

    (Physics and Mathematics Department, Orel State University, Komsomol’skaya St., 95, 302026 Orel, Russia)

  • Vyacheslav Vasilyevich Provotorov

    (Mathematics Department, Voronezh State University, 1, Universitetskaya pl., 394006 Voronezh, Russia)

  • Irina Vasilievna Kapustina

    (Graduate School of Service and Trade, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaya, 29, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Sergey Mikhailovich Sergeev

    (Graduate School of Service and Trade, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Polytechnicheskaya, 29, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Elena De La Poza Plaza

    (Center for Economic Engineering (INECO), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Lilya Saychenko

    (Department of Development and Exploration of Oil and Gas Wells, St. Petersburg Mining University, 199106 St. Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

Globalization has given a powerful impetus to the development of international commercial activity and logistics management systems taking full advantage of cross-border networking. The solution lies at the intersection of information technologies, technical means of machine-to-machine (M2M) interaction, mobile high-speed networks, geolocation, cloud services, and a number of international standards. The current trend towards creating digital logistics platforms has set a number of serious challenges for developers. The most important requirement is the condition of sustainability of the obtained solutions with respect to disturbances in the conditions of logistics activities caused not only by market uncertainty but also by a whole set of unfavorable factors accompanying the transportation process. Within the framework of the presented research, the problem of obtaining the conditions for the stability of solutions obtained on the basis of mathematical models is set. At the same time, the processes of transferring not only discrete but also continuous material flows through complex structured networks are taken into account. This study contains the results of the analysis of the stability of solutions of differential systems of various types that simulate the transfer processes in network media. Initial boundary value problems for evolutionary equations and differential-difference systems are relevant in logistics, both for the discrete transportation of a wide range of goods and for the quasi-continuous transportation of, for example, liquid hydrocarbons. The criterion for the work of a logistics operator is the integral functional. For the mathematical description of the transport process of continuous and discrete media, a wide class of integrable functions are used, which adequately describe the transport of media with a complex internal rheological structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey Evgenievich Barykin & Larisa Nikolaevna Borisoglebskaya & Vyacheslav Vasilyevich Provotorov & Irina Vasilievna Kapustina & Sergey Mikhailovich Sergeev & Elena De La Poza Plaza & Lilya Saychenko, 2021. "Sustainability of Management Decisions in a Digital Logistics Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9289-:d:616944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9289/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/9289/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John P. Wilson & Larry Campbell, 2016. "Financial functional analysis: a conceptual framework for understanding the changing financial system," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 413-431, October.
    2. Maria Ángeles Alcaide González & Elena De La Poza Plaza & Natividad Guadalajara Olmeda, 2020. "The impact of corporate social responsibility transparency on the financial performance, brand value, and sustainability level of IT companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 642-654, March.
    3. Matthias Filser & Sascha Kraus & Norat Roig-Tierno & Norbert Kailer & Ulrike Fischer, 2019. "Entrepreneurship as Catalyst for Sustainable Development: Opening the Black Box," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Gupta, Ranjit & Mejia, Cristian & Kajikawa, Yuya, 2019. "Business, innovation and digital ecosystems landscape survey and knowledge cross sharing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 100-109.
    5. Martin Kenney & John Zysman, 2020. "The platform economy: restructuring the space of capitalist accumulation," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 55-76.
    6. Andreas Kuckertz, 2020. "Bioeconomy Transformation Strategies Worldwide Require Stronger Focus on Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-8, April.
    7. Lu Zhang & Xiaochao Guo & Zhimei Lei & Ming K. Lim, 2019. "Social Network Analysis of Sustainable Human Resource Management from the Employee Training’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yingjia Zhong & Hongyan Zhao & Tianbao Yin, 2023. "Resource Bundling: How Does Enterprise Digital Transformation Affect Enterprise ESG Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Zhang, Shuzhi & Xie, Guangxiong, 2023. "Promoting green investment for renewable energy sources in China: Case study from autoregressive distributed Lagged in error correction approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 359-368.
    3. Yuriy Leonidovich Zhukovskiy & Margarita Sergeevna Kovalchuk & Daria Evgenievna Batueva & Nikita Dmitrievich Senchilo, 2021. "Development of an Algorithm for Regulating the Load Schedule of Educational Institutions Based on the Forecast of Electric Consumption within the Framework of Application of the Demand Response," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Sergey Evgenievich Barykin & Anna Viktorovna Strimovskaya & Sergey Mikhailovich Sergeev & Larisa Nikolaevna Borisoglebskaya & Natalia Dedyukhina & Igor Sklyarov & Julia Sklyarova & Lilya Saychenko, 2023. "Smart City Logistics on the Basis of Digital Tools for ESG Goals Achievement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Lin, Chia-Yang & Chau, Ka Yin & Tran, Trung Kien & Sadiq, Muhammad & Van, Le & Hien Phan, Thi Thu, 2022. "Development of renewable energy resources by green finance, volatility and risk: Empirical evidence from China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 821-831.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vladimir Yadykin & Sergey Barykin & Vladimir Badenko & Nikolai Bolshakov & Elena de la Poza & Alexander Fedotov, 2021. "Global Challenges of Digital Transformation of Markets: Collaboration and Digital Assets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, September.
    2. V. I. Blanutsa, 2022. "Geographic Research of the Platform Economy: Existing and Potential Approaches," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 133-142, June.
    3. Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    4. Cristóbal Parra Quesada & Manuela Cañizares Espada, 2024. "Relationship of market capitalization of the IBEX 35 to corporate social responsibility and transparency," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3551-3572, July.
    5. Bas Paris & Dimitris Michas & Athanasios T. Balafoutis & Leonardo Nibbi & Jan Skvaril & Hailong Li & Duarte Pimentel & Carlota da Silva & Elena Athanasopoulou & Dimitrios Petropoulos & Nikolaos Aposto, 2023. "A Review of the Current Practices of Bioeconomy Education and Training in the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Costa Climent, Ricardo & Haftor, Darek M., 2021. "Business model theory-based prediction of digital technology use: An empirical assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    7. Jorge Gustavo Rodríguez Aboytes & Matthias Barth, 2020. "Learning Processes in the Early Development of Sustainable Niches: The Case of Sustainable Fashion Entrepreneurs in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-26, October.
    8. Evgeny V. Popov & Wadim Strielkowski & Maksim V. Vlasov, 2020. "Digitalization of intellectual activity in Russian regions," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 24-32, March.
    9. Kajikawa, Yuya & Mejia, Cristian & Wu, Mengjia & Zhang, Yi, 2022. "Academic landscape of Technological Forecasting and Social Change through citation network and topic analyses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    10. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M.Ángeles & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2020. "Does investor attention influence water companies’ stock returns?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Flechas, Ximena Alejandra & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Borini, Felipe Mendes, 2021. "Ecosystem management: Past achievements and future promises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    12. E.V. Orlova, 2021. "Assessment of the Human Capital of an Enterprise and its Management in the Context of the Digital Transformation of the Economy," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 20(4), pages 666-700.
    13. Gernot Grabher & Erwin van Tuijl, 2020. "Uber-production: From global networks to digital platforms," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(5), pages 1005-1016, August.
    14. Luis E. Villegas & Andrés A. Acuña-Duarte & César A. Salazar, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Willingness to Eco-Innovate among Chilean Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Kouam, Jean & Asongu, Simplice, 2022. "Effects of Taxation on Social Innovation and Implications for Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Developing Countries: A Literature Review," MPRA Paper 114061, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Eric Knight & Dariusz Wójcik, 2020. "FinTech, economy and space: Introduction to the special issue," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(8), pages 1490-1497, November.
    17. Anna Davies & Betsy Donald & Mia Gray, 2023. "The power of platforms—precarity and place," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(2), pages 245-256.
    18. Merello, Paloma & Barberá, Antonio & la Poza, Elena De, 2022. "Is the sustainability profile of FinTech companies a key driver of their value?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    19. Tianlei Pi & Haoxuan Hu & Jingyi Lu & Xue Chen, 2022. "The Analysis of Fintech Risks in China: Based on Fuzzy Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Sebastian Planck & Sonja Wilhelm & Johanna Kobilke & Klaus Sailer, 2024. "Greater than the Sum of Its Parts: Combining Entrepreneurial and Sustainable Competencies in Entrepreneurship Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:9289-:d:616944. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.