IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i2p954-d1025357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review of the Current Practices of Bioeconomy Education and Training in the EU

Author

Listed:
  • Bas Paris

    (Institute of Bio-Economy & Agro-Technology, Centre of Research & Technology Hellas, Dimarchou Georgiadou 118, 38333 Volos, Greece)

  • Dimitris Michas

    (Institute of Bio-Economy & Agro-Technology, Centre of Research & Technology Hellas, Dimarchou Georgiadou 118, 38333 Volos, Greece)

  • Athanasios T. Balafoutis

    (Institute of Bio-Economy & Agro-Technology, Centre of Research & Technology Hellas, Dimarchou Georgiadou 118, 38333 Volos, Greece)

  • Leonardo Nibbi

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy)

  • Jan Skvaril

    (School of Business, Society and Engineering, Mälardalen University, 723 21 Västerås, Sweden)

  • Hailong Li

    (School of Business, Society and Engineering, Mälardalen University, 723 21 Västerås, Sweden)

  • Duarte Pimentel

    (TERINOV—Parque de Ciência e Tecnologia da Ilha Terceira, 9700-702 Terra Chã, Portugal
    Centro de Estudos de Economia Aplicada do Atlântico (CEEAplA), University of the Azores, 9500-321 Ponta Delgada, Portugal)

  • Carlota da Silva

    (TERINOV—Parque de Ciência e Tecnologia da Ilha Terceira, 9700-702 Terra Chã, Portugal)

  • Elena Athanasopoulou

    (Department of Business and Organizations Administration, University of Peloponnese, Antikalamos, 24100 Kalamata, Greece)

  • Dimitrios Petropoulos

    (Department of Agriculture, University of Peloponnese, Antikalamos, 24100 Kalamata, Greece)

  • Nikolaos Apostolopoulos

    (Department of Management Science and Technology, University of Peloponnese, 22100 Tripoli, Greece)

Abstract

This study conducts a review of the current practices of bioeconomy education and training in the EU; as well as the associated methodologies; techniques and approaches. In recent years; considerable efforts have been made towards developing appropriate bioeconomy education and training programs in order to support a transition towards a circular bioeconomy. This review separates bioeconomy education approaches along: higher education and academic approaches, vocational education and training (VET) and practical approaches, short-term training and education approaches, and other approaches. A range of training methodologies and techniques and pedagogical approaches are identified. The main commonalities found amongst these approaches are that they are generally problem based and interdisciplinary, and combine academic and experiential. Higher education approaches are generally based on traditional lecture/campus-based formats with some experiential approaches integrated. In contrast, VET approaches often combine academic and practical learning methods while focusing on developing practical skills. A range of short-term courses and other approaches to bioeconomy education are also reviewed.

Suggested Citation

  • Bas Paris & Dimitris Michas & Athanasios T. Balafoutis & Leonardo Nibbi & Jan Skvaril & Hailong Li & Duarte Pimentel & Carlota da Silva & Elena Athanasopoulou & Dimitrios Petropoulos & Nikolaos Aposto, 2023. "A Review of the Current Practices of Bioeconomy Education and Training in the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:954-:d:1025357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/954/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/2/954/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Urmetzer, Sophie & Lask, Jan & Vargas-Carpintero, Ricardo & Pyka, Andreas, 2020. "Learning to change: Transformative knowledge for building a sustainable bioeconomy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Ruxandra Bejinaru & Cristian Valentin Hapenciuc & Iulian Condratov & Pavel Stanciu, 2018. "The University Role in Developing the Human Capital for a Sustainable Bioeconomy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 583-583, August.
    3. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:583 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Andreas Kuckertz, 2020. "Bioeconomy Transformation Strategies Worldwide Require Stronger Focus on Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-8, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Hinderer & Leif Brändle & Andreas Kuckertz, 2021. "Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Delia-Elena Diaconașu & Ionel Bostan & Cristina Căutișanu & Irina Chiriac, 2022. "Insights into the Sustainable Development of the Bioeconomy at the European Level, in the Context of the Desired Clean Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Zabulionienė Erika & Pranskūnienė Rasa, 2021. "Personal Experiences of Bioeconomy Development: Autoethography Approach," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 43(3), pages 346-353, September.
    4. Abbate, Stefano & Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto, 2023. "From Fast to Slow: An Exploratory Analysis of Circular Business Models in the Italian Apparel Industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    5. Floris C. Boogaard & Guri Venvik & Rui L. Pedroso de Lima & Ana C. Cassanti & Allard H. Roest & Antal Zuurman, 2020. "ClimateCafé: An Interdisciplinary Educational Tool for Sustainable Climate Adaptation and Lessons Learned," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Andreas Kuckertz, 2020. "Bioeconomy Transformation Strategies Worldwide Require Stronger Focus on Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-8, April.
    7. Nina Golowko & Katrin Marquardt & Sonia Budz & Ulrike Stefanie Foerster-Metz (Foerster-Pastor), 2019. "German Students’ Perception of Bioeconomy – An Exploratory Study," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 138-138, February.
    8. Ulrich Müller & Armin Lude & Dawson R. Hancock, 2020. "Leading Schools towards Sustainability. Fields of Action and Management Strategies for Principals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Sergey Evgenievich Barykin & Larisa Nikolaevna Borisoglebskaya & Vyacheslav Vasilyevich Provotorov & Irina Vasilievna Kapustina & Sergey Mikhailovich Sergeev & Elena De La Poza Plaza & Lilya Saychenko, 2021. "Sustainability of Management Decisions in a Digital Logistics Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    10. Mauricio Alviar & Andrés García-Suaza & Laura Ramírez-Gómez & Simón Villegas-Velásquez, 2021. "Measuring the Contribution of the Bioeconomy: The Case of Colombia and Antioquia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, February.
    11. Wolfgang Onyeali & Michael P. Schlaile & Bastian Winkler, 2023. "Navigating the Biocosmos: Cornerstones of a Bioeconomic Utopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    12. Maximilian Kardung & Kutay Cingiz & Ortwin Costenoble & Roel Delahaye & Wim Heijman & Marko Lovrić & Myrna van Leeuwen & Robert M’Barek & Hans van Meijl & Stephan Piotrowski & Tévécia Ronzon & Johanne, 2021. "Development of the Circular Bioeconomy: Drivers and Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Athanasios T. Balafoutis & Magdalena Borzecka & Stelios Rozakis & Katerina Troullaki & Foteini Vandorou & Malgorzata Wydra, 2024. "Investigating Published Research towards a Fossil-Energy-Free Agriculture Transformation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Grillot, Myriam & Ruault, Jean-François & Torre, André & Bray, Frédéric & Madelrieux, Sophie, 2021. "Le proto-métabolisme : approche du fonctionnement bioéconomique d’un territoire agricole," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 376(April-Jun).
    15. Bejinaru Ruxandra & Toma Marian-Vlăduț, 2024. "AR Technology Potential for Facilitating Access to Advanced Education for Students with ASD," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1848-1856.
    16. Bratianu Constantin & Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2023. "Wisdom Management: A Semantic Analysis," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 1167-1178, July.
    17. Pavel Stanciu & Daniela Mihaela Neamțu & Iulian Alexandru Condratov & Cristian-Valentin Hapenciuc & Ruxandra Bejinaru, 2023. "Dynamics of Teleworking and Impact on Stakeholders in the Current Pandemic Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Alexandra Gottinger & Luana Ladu & Rainer Quitzow, 2020. "Studying the Transition towards a Circular Bioeconomy—A Systematic Literature Review on Transition Studies and Existing Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    19. Ahmed Hassan Abdou & Thowayeb H. Hassan & Amany E. Salem & Mohamed Ahmed Elsaied & Ahmed Anwar Elsaed, 2022. "Determinants and Consequences of Green Investment in the Saudi Arabian Hotel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Sanz-Hernández, Alexia & Jiménez-Caballero, Paula & Zarauz, Irene, 2022. "Gender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:954-:d:1025357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.