IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i13p7196-d583128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Susceptibility Analysis of Glacier Debris Flow by Investigating the Changes in Glaciers Based on Remote Sensing: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ruoshen Lin

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Gang Mei

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Ziyang Liu

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Ning Xi

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiaona Zhang

    (School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Glacier debris flow is one of the most critical categories of geological hazards in high-mountain regions. To reduce its potential negative effects, it needs to investigate the susceptibility of glacier debris flow. However, when evaluating the susceptibility of glacier debris flow, most research work considered the impact of existing glacier area, while ignoring the impact of changes in glacier ablation volume. In this paper, we considered the impact of the changes in the glacier ablation volume to investigate the susceptibility of glacier debris flow. We proposed to evaluate the susceptibility analysis in G217 gullies with frequent glacial debris flow on the Duku highway, Xinjiang Province. Specifically, by using the simple band ratio method with the manual correction to identify glacier outlines, we identified the ablation zone by comparing the glacier boundary in 2000 with that in 2015. We then calculated ablation volume by changes in glacier elevation and ablation area from 2000 to 2015. Finally, we used the volume of glacier melting in different watersheds as the main factor to evaluate the susceptibility based on the improved geomorphic information entropy (GIE) method. We found that, overall, the improved GIE method with a correction coefficient based on the glacier ablation volume is better than the previous method. Deglaciation can be adapted to analyze glacier debris flow susceptibility based on glaciology and geomorphology. Our presented work can be applied to other similar glacial debris flow events in high-mountain regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruoshen Lin & Gang Mei & Ziyang Liu & Ning Xi & Xiaona Zhang, 2021. "Susceptibility Analysis of Glacier Debris Flow by Investigating the Changes in Glaciers Based on Remote Sensing: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7196-:d:583128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/13/7196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alina Motschmann & Christian Huggel & Mark Carey & Holly Moulton & Noah Walker-Crawford & Randy Muñoz, 2020. "Losses and damages connected to glacier retreat in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 837-858, September.
    2. Susan Cannon & Eric Boldt & Jayme Laber & Jason Kean & Dennis Staley, 2011. "Rainfall intensity–duration thresholds for postfire debris-flow emergency-response planning," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 59(1), pages 209-236, October.
    3. Dieter Rickenmann, 1999. "Empirical Relationships for Debris Flows," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 19(1), pages 47-77, January.
    4. Christian Sommer & Philipp Malz & Thorsten C. Seehaus & Stefan Lippl & Michael Zemp & Matthias H. Braun, 2020. "Rapid glacier retreat and downwasting throughout the European Alps in the early 21st century," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Tobias Bolch & Juliane Peters & Alexandr Yegorov & Biswajeet Pradhan & Manfred Buchroithner & Victor Blagoveshchensky, 2011. "Identification of potentially dangerous glacial lakes in the northern Tien Shan," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 59(3), pages 1691-1714, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raquel Melo & José Luís Zêzere, 2017. "Modeling debris flow initiation and run-out in recently burned areas using data-driven methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(3), pages 1373-1407, September.
    2. Alexander N. Gorr & Luke A. McGuire & Rebecca Beers & Olivia J. Hoch, 2023. "Triggering conditions, runout, and downstream impacts of debris flows following the 2021 Flag Fire, Arizona, USA," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 2473-2504, July.
    3. Florian Kapmeier, 2020. "Reflections on developing a simulation model on sustainable and healthy diets for decision makers: Comment on the paper by Kopainsky," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 928-935, November.
    4. Francesco Gentile & Tiziana Bisantino & Giuliana Trisorio Liuzzi, 2008. "Debris-flow risk analysis in south Gargano watersheds (Southern-Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 44(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Hyo-sub Kang & Yun-tae Kim, 2016. "The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1475-1493, February.
    6. Caroline Taylor & Tom R. Robinson & Stuart Dunning & J. Rachel Carr & Matthew Westoby, 2023. "Glacial lake outburst floods threaten millions globally," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. John E. Gordon, 2023. "Climate Change and Geotourism: Impacts, Challenges, and Opportunities," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Lalan Kumar Jha & Deepak Khare, 2017. "Detection and delineation of glacial lakes and identification of potentially dangerous lakes of Dhauliganga basin in the Himalaya by remote sensing techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(1), pages 301-327, January.
    9. Khattri, Khim B. & Pudasaini, Shiva P., 2019. "Channel flow simulation of a mixture with a full-dimensional generalized quasi two-phase model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 280-305.
    10. M. Jakob & D. Stein & M. Ulmi, 2012. "Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 60(2), pages 241-261, January.
    11. Katrin Sieron & Lucia Capra & Sergio Rodríguez-Elizararrás, 2014. "Hazard assessment at San Martín volcano based on geological record, numerical modeling, and spatial analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(1), pages 275-297, January.
    12. Vinicius Queiroz Veloso & Fabio Augusto Vieira Gomes Reis & Victor Cabral & José Eduardo Zaine & Claudia Vanessa Santos Corrêa & Marcelo Fischer Gramani & Caiubi Emmanuel Kuhn, 2023. "Hazard assessment of debris-flow-prone watersheds in Cubatão, São Paulo State, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 3119-3138, April.
    13. Anna Ferrero & Maria Migliazza & Marina Pirulli, 2015. "Advance survey and modelling technologies for the study of the slope stability in an Alpine basin," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(1), pages 303-326, March.
    14. Adnan Özdemir & Mehmet Delikanli, 2009. "A geotechnical investigation of the retrogressive Yaka Landslide and the debris flow threatening the town of Yaka (Isparta, SW Turkey)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 49(1), pages 113-136, April.
    15. G. Chevalier & V. Medina & M. Hürlimann & A. Bateman, 2013. "Debris-flow susceptibility analysis using fluvio-morphological parameters and data mining: application to the Central-Eastern Pyrenees," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 67(2), pages 213-238, June.
    16. Shijin Wang, 2024. "Opportunities and threats of cryosphere change to the achievement of UN 2030 SDGs," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Chao Ma & Kaiheng Hu & Mi Tian, 2013. "Comparison of debris-flow volume and activity under different formation conditions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 67(2), pages 261-273, June.
    18. Gerardo Grelle & Antonietta Rossi & Paola Revellino & Luigi Guerriero & Francesco Maria Guadagno & Giuseppe Sappa, 2019. "Assessment of Debris-Flow Erosion and Deposit Areas by Morphometric Analysis and a GIS-Based Simplified Procedure: A Case Study of Paupisi in the Southern Apennines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Veniamin Perov & Sergey Chernomorets & Olga Budarina & Elena Savernyuk & Tatiana Leontyeva, 2017. "Debris flow hazards for mountain regions of Russia: regional features and key events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(1), pages 199-235, August.
    20. Der-Guey Lin & Sen-Yen Hsu & Kuang-Tsung Chang, 2009. "Numerical simulations of flow motion and deposition characteristics of granular debris flows," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 50(3), pages 623-650, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:13:p:7196-:d:583128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.