IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v117y2023i3d10.1007_s11069-023-05952-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Triggering conditions, runout, and downstream impacts of debris flows following the 2021 Flag Fire, Arizona, USA

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander N. Gorr

    (The University of Arizona)

  • Luke A. McGuire

    (The University of Arizona)

  • Rebecca Beers

    (The University of Arizona)

  • Olivia J. Hoch

    (The University of Arizona
    U.S. Geological Survey)

Abstract

Debris flows pose a serious threat to communities in mountainous areas, particularly in the years following wildfire. These events have been widely studied in regions where post-wildfire debris flows have been historically frequent, such as southern California. However, the threat of post-wildfire debris flows is increasing in many regions where detailed data on debris-flow physical properties, volume, and runout potential are sparse, such as the Southwest United States (Arizona and New Mexico). As the Southwest becomes more vulnerable to these hazards, there is an increasing need to better characterize the properties of post-wildfire debris flows in this region and to identify similarities and differences with nearby areas, particularly southern California, where there is a greater abundance of data. In this paper, we study the characteristics and downstream impacts of two post-wildfire debris flows that initiated following the 2021 Flag Fire in northern Arizona, United States. We gathered data regarding soil hydraulic properties, rainfall characteristics, watershed response, and debris-flow initiation, runout, volume, grain size, and downstream impacts during the first two monsoon seasons following the containment of the Flag Fire. We also applied established debris-flow runout and volume models that were developed in southern California to our study watershed and compared the output with observations. In the first monsoon season following the fire, there were two post-wildfire debris flows, one of which resulted in damage to downstream infrastructure, and one major flood event. We found that, while more intense rainfall is required to generate debris flows at our study site compared to southern California, burned watersheds in northern Arizona are still susceptible to debris flows during storms with low recurrence intervals in the first year following fire. During the second monsoon season, there were no major runoff events, despite more intense storms. This indicates that the temporal window for heightened debris-flow susceptibility at our study area was less than one year, due to the recovery of soil hydraulic properties and vegetation regrowth. We also found that the debris-flow properties at our study site, such as volume, mobility, and grain size distribution, may differ from those in other regions in the western United States, including southern California, potentially due to regional differences in rainfall characteristics and sediment supply. Differences in rainfall characteristics and sediment supply may have also influenced the performance of the debris-flow runout and volume models, which overpredicted the observed runout distance by 400 m and predicted a volume more than 17 times greater than what was observed.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander N. Gorr & Luke A. McGuire & Rebecca Beers & Olivia J. Hoch, 2023. "Triggering conditions, runout, and downstream impacts of debris flows following the 2021 Flag Fire, Arizona, USA," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 2473-2504, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:117:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-05952-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-05952-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-05952-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-05952-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Casey Dowling & Paul Santi, 2014. "Debris flows and their toll on human life: a global analysis of debris-flow fatalities from 1950 to 2011," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 71(1), pages 203-227, March.
    2. Dieter Rickenmann, 1999. "Empirical Relationships for Debris Flows," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 19(1), pages 47-77, January.
    3. Susan Cannon & Eric Boldt & Jayme Laber & Jason Kean & Dennis Staley, 2011. "Rainfall intensity–duration thresholds for postfire debris-flow emergency-response planning," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 59(1), pages 209-236, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raquel Melo & José Luís Zêzere, 2017. "Modeling debris flow initiation and run-out in recently burned areas using data-driven methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(3), pages 1373-1407, September.
    2. Ruoshen Lin & Gang Mei & Ziyang Liu & Ning Xi & Xiaona Zhang, 2021. "Susceptibility Analysis of Glacier Debris Flow by Investigating the Changes in Glaciers Based on Remote Sensing: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Francesco Gentile & Tiziana Bisantino & Giuliana Trisorio Liuzzi, 2008. "Debris-flow risk analysis in south Gargano watersheds (Southern-Italy)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 44(1), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Hyo-sub Kang & Yun-tae Kim, 2016. "The physical vulnerability of different types of building structure to debris flow events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1475-1493, February.
    5. Khattri, Khim B. & Pudasaini, Shiva P., 2019. "Channel flow simulation of a mixture with a full-dimensional generalized quasi two-phase model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 280-305.
    6. M. Jakob & D. Stein & M. Ulmi, 2012. "Vulnerability of buildings to debris flow impact," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 60(2), pages 241-261, January.
    7. Katrin Sieron & Lucia Capra & Sergio Rodríguez-Elizararrás, 2014. "Hazard assessment at San Martín volcano based on geological record, numerical modeling, and spatial analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(1), pages 275-297, January.
    8. Vinicius Queiroz Veloso & Fabio Augusto Vieira Gomes Reis & Victor Cabral & José Eduardo Zaine & Claudia Vanessa Santos Corrêa & Marcelo Fischer Gramani & Caiubi Emmanuel Kuhn, 2023. "Hazard assessment of debris-flow-prone watersheds in Cubatão, São Paulo State, Brazil," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(3), pages 3119-3138, April.
    9. Anna Ferrero & Maria Migliazza & Marina Pirulli, 2015. "Advance survey and modelling technologies for the study of the slope stability in an Alpine basin," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(1), pages 303-326, March.
    10. Zhiheng Wang & Dongchuan Wang & Qiaozhen Guo & Daikun Wang, 2020. "Regional landslide hazard assessment through integrating susceptibility index and rainfall process," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(3), pages 2153-2173, December.
    11. Adnan Özdemir & Mehmet Delikanli, 2009. "A geotechnical investigation of the retrogressive Yaka Landslide and the debris flow threatening the town of Yaka (Isparta, SW Turkey)," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 49(1), pages 113-136, April.
    12. G. Chevalier & V. Medina & M. Hürlimann & A. Bateman, 2013. "Debris-flow susceptibility analysis using fluvio-morphological parameters and data mining: application to the Central-Eastern Pyrenees," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 67(2), pages 213-238, June.
    13. Jon L. Riedel & Sharon M. Sarrantonio, 2021. "Debris flow magnitude, frequency, and precipitation threshold in the eastern North Cascades, Washington, USA," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(3), pages 2519-2544, April.
    14. Chao Ma & Kaiheng Hu & Mi Tian, 2013. "Comparison of debris-flow volume and activity under different formation conditions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 67(2), pages 261-273, June.
    15. Gerardo Grelle & Antonietta Rossi & Paola Revellino & Luigi Guerriero & Francesco Maria Guadagno & Giuseppe Sappa, 2019. "Assessment of Debris-Flow Erosion and Deposit Areas by Morphometric Analysis and a GIS-Based Simplified Procedure: A Case Study of Paupisi in the Southern Apennines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Veniamin Perov & Sergey Chernomorets & Olga Budarina & Elena Savernyuk & Tatiana Leontyeva, 2017. "Debris flow hazards for mountain regions of Russia: regional features and key events," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 88(1), pages 199-235, August.
    17. Der-Guey Lin & Sen-Yen Hsu & Kuang-Tsung Chang, 2009. "Numerical simulations of flow motion and deposition characteristics of granular debris flows," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 50(3), pages 623-650, September.
    18. Martin Mergili & Wolfgang Fellin & Stella Moreiras & Johann Stötter, 2012. "Simulation of debris flows in the Central Andes based on Open Source GIS: possibilities, limitations, and parameter sensitivity," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 61(3), pages 1051-1081, April.
    19. Xiaojun Guo & Xingchang Chen & Guohu Song & Jianqi Zhuang & Jianglin Fan, 2021. "Debris flows in the Lushan earthquake area: formation characteristics, rainfall conditions, and evolutionary tendency," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(3), pages 2663-2687, April.
    20. Sven Fuchs & Margreth Keiler & Sergey Sokratov & Alexander Shnyparkov, 2013. "Spatiotemporal dynamics: the need for an innovative approach in mountain hazard risk management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 68(3), pages 1217-1241, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:117:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-05952-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.