IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i12p6659-d573194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Framework for Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Smart Manufacturing Enterprises: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Zeki Murat Çınar

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta 99628, North Cyprus via Mersin, Turkey)

  • Qasim Zeeshan

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta 99628, North Cyprus via Mersin, Turkey)

  • Orhan Korhan

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta 99628, North Cyprus via Mersin, Turkey)

Abstract

Recently, researchers have proposed various maturity models (MMs) for assessing Industry 4.0 (I4.0) adoption; however, few have proposed a readiness framework (F/W) integrated with technology forecasting (TF) to evaluate the growth of I4.0 adoption and consequently provide a roadmap for the implementation of I4.0 for smart manufacturing enterprises. The aims of this study were (1) to review the research related to existing I4.0 MMs and F/Ws; (2) to propose a modular MM with four dimensions, five levels, 60 second-level dimensions, and 246 sub-dimensions, and a generic F/W with four layers and seven hierarchy levels; and (3) to conduct a survey-based case study of an automobile parts manufacturing enterprise by applying the MM and F/W to assess the I4.0 adoption level and TF model to anticipate the growth of I4.0. MM and F/W integrated with TF provides insight into the current situation and growth of the enterprise regarding I4.0 adoption, by identifying the gap areas, and provide a foundation for I4.0 integration. Case study findings show that the enterprise’s overall maturity score is 2.73 out of 5.00, and the forecasted year of full integration of I4.0 is between 2031 and 2034 depending upon the policy decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeki Murat Çınar & Qasim Zeeshan & Orhan Korhan, 2021. "A Framework for Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Smart Manufacturing Enterprises: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-32, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6659-:d:573194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6659/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/12/6659/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adamuthe, Amol C. & Thampi, Gopakumaran T., 2019. "Technology forecasting: A case study of computational technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 181-189.
    2. Meade, Nigel & Islam, Towhidul, 1995. "Forecasting with growth curves: An empirical comparison," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 199-215, June.
    3. Alexandre Moeuf & Robert Pellerin & Samir Lamouri & Simon Tamayo-Giraldo & Rodolphe Barbaray, 2018. "The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(3), pages 1118-1136, February.
    4. Erwin Rauch & Marco Unterhofer & Rafael A. Rojas & Luca Gualtieri & Manuel Woschank & Dominik T. Matt, 2020. "A Maturity Level-Based Assessment Tool to Enhance the Implementation of Industry 4.0 in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Zeki Murat Çınar & Abubakar Abdussalam Nuhu & Qasim Zeeshan & Orhan Korhan & Mohammed Asmael & Babak Safaei, 2020. "Machine Learning in Predictive Maintenance towards Sustainable Smart Manufacturing in Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-42, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah Maggioli & Liliana Cunha, 2023. "A Systematic Review Discussing the Sustainability of Men and Women’s Work in Industry 4.0: Are Technologies Gender-Neutral?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Julio Henrique Costa Nobrega & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Vasco Sanchez-Rodrigues & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Walter Leal Filho & Milena Pavan Serafim & Rosley Anholon, 2021. "Logistics 4.0 in Brazil: Critical Analysis and Relationships with SDG 9 Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Bhatia, Purvee & Diaz-Elsayed, Nancy, 2023. "Facilitating decision-making for the adoption of smart manufacturing technologies by SMEs via fuzzy TOPSIS," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    4. Fawaz M. Abdullah & Abdulrahman M. Al-Ahmari & Saqib Anwar, 2023. "Analyzing Interdependencies among Influencing Factors in Smart Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2022. "In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    2. Sony, Michael & Naik, Subhash, 2020. "Industry 4.0 integration with socio-technical systems theory: A systematic review and proposed theoretical model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    3. Maria Polorecka & Jozef Kubas & Pavel Danihelka & Katarina Petrlova & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Katarina Buganova, 2021. "Use of Software on Modeling Hazardous Substance Release as a Support Tool for Crisis Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Zahoor, Nadia & Zopiatis, Anastasios & Adomako, Samuel & Lamprinakos, Grigorios, 2023. "The micro-foundations of digitally transforming SMEs: How digital literacy and technology interact with managerial attributes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Krishnan, Trichy V. & Feng, Shanfei & Jain, Dipak C., 2023. "Peak sales time prediction in new product sales: Can a product manager rely on it?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    6. Anhang Chen & Huiqin Zhang & Yuxiang Zhang & Junwei Zhao, 2024. "Manufacturers’ digital transformation under carbon cap-and-trade policy: investment strategy and environmental impact," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Durga Prasad Penumuru & Sreekumar Muthuswamy & Premkumar Karumbu, 2020. "Identification and classification of materials using machine vision and machine learning in the context of industry 4.0," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 1229-1241, June.
    8. Olcay Özge Ersöz & Ali Fırat İnal & Adnan Aktepe & Ahmet Kürşad Türker & Süleyman Ersöz, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review of the Predictive Maintenance from Transportation Systems Aspect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Justyna Łapińska & Iwona Escher & Joanna Górka & Agata Sudolska & Paweł Brzustewicz, 2021. "Employees’ Trust in Artificial Intelligence in Companies: The Case of Energy and Chemical Industries in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Joost M. E. Pennings & Ale Smidts, 2003. "The Shape of Utility Functions and Organizational Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(9), pages 1251-1263, September.
    11. André Marie Mbakop & Joseph Voufo & Florent Biyeme & Jean Raymond Lucien Meva’a, 2022. "Moving to a Flexible Shop Floor by Analyzing the Information Flow Coming from Levels of Decision on the Shop Floor of Developing Countries Using Artificial Neural Network: Cameroon, Case Study," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(2), pages 255-270, June.
    12. Al-Alawi, Baha M. & Bradley, Thomas H., 2013. "Review of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle market modeling Studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 190-203.
    13. Xi, Xi & Ren, Feifei & Yu, Lean & Yang, Jing, 2023. "Detecting the technology's evolutionary pathway using HiDS-trait-driven tech mining strategy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    14. Franklin M. Lartey, 2020. "Predicting Product Uptake Using Bass, Gompertz, and Logistic Diffusion Models: Application to a Broadband Product," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(2), pages 1-5, October.
    15. Zander, Bennet & Lange, Kerstin & Haasis, Hans-Dietrich, 2021. "Designing the data supply chain of a smart construction factory," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. & Blecker, Thorsten (ed.), Adapting to the Future: How Digitalization Shapes Sustainable Logistics and Resilient Supply Chain Management. Proceedings of the Hamburg Internationa, volume 31, pages 41-62, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    16. Saud Altaf & Shafiq Ahmad & Mazen Zaindin & Shamsul Huda & Sofia Iqbal & Muhammad Waseem Soomro, 2022. "Multiple Industrial Induction Motors Fault Diagnosis Model within Powerline System Based on Wireless Sensor Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-29, August.
    17. Bianco, Débora & Bueno, Adauto & Godinho Filho, Moacir & Latan, Hengky & Miller Devós Ganga, Gilberto & Frank, Alejandro G. & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose, 2023. "The role of Industry 4.0 in developing resilience for manufacturing companies during COVID-19," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    18. Yüksel, Hilmi, 2020. "An empirical evaluation of industry 4.0 applications of companies in Turkey: The case of a developing country," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    19. F-M Tseng, 2008. "Quadratic interval innovation diffusion models for new product sales forecasting," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(8), pages 1120-1127, August.
    20. Rockey, James & Temple, Jonathan, 2016. "Growth econometrics for agnostics and true believers," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 86-102.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:12:p:6659-:d:573194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.