IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v257y2023ics0925527322003449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facilitating decision-making for the adoption of smart manufacturing technologies by SMEs via fuzzy TOPSIS

Author

Listed:
  • Bhatia, Purvee
  • Diaz-Elsayed, Nancy

Abstract

The fourth industrial revolution or Industry 4.0 has changed today's manufacturing scenario. The need to make manufacturing systems agile, adaptive, resilient, and robust, due to the pandemic, has expediated the adoption and implementation of smart manufacturing technologies. Despite the interest of manufacturers in smart manufacturing, the adoption rate has been slow. Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can be especially hindered in adoption due to the lack of a transition strategy and identification of relevant technologies required to achieve a smart factory. Although there is literature that provides maturity and readiness models and toolkits for adoption, the decision-making models for SMEs are inadequate. This paper proposes a multi-criteria decision-making model as a tool to provide a means for evaluating a large range of smart manufacturing technologies while considering the status quo for SMEs. The aim of this project is to aid SMEs in the adoption of smart manufacturing technologies by providing a roadmap to assess performance parameters and identify an appropriate smart manufacturing technology for adoption. The recommended technology is tailored to the requirements of the SME using fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). The fuzzy TOPSIS technique aggregates the opinions of decision makers and uses a fuzzy environment to account for their subjectivity. The inclusion of personnel as provided by the model from various hierarchical levels promotes favourable implementation by insertion in the transition process while also educating the personnel of the technologies. An industry case study with individuals from an SME, Levil Technology, and Florida's Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Center, FloridaMakes, is conducted to assess the preference for five smart manufacturing technologies over a range of eleven criteria pertaining to performance, sustainability, quality, cost and maintenance. The results give clarity regarding the preference for critical manufacturing criteria by assigning weightage, and identifies the most relevant technology catering to the preferred criteria. Predictive analytics for asset health monitoring was found to be most preferred followed by a digitally connected factory for visibility into production operations. The determination of rank will allow manufacturers to assess the manufacturing alternatives with respect to the key performance indicators for transition to Industry 4.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhatia, Purvee & Diaz-Elsayed, Nancy, 2023. "Facilitating decision-making for the adoption of smart manufacturing technologies by SMEs via fuzzy TOPSIS," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:257:y:2023:i:c:s0925527322003449
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527322003449
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeongcheol Lee & Sungbum Jun & Tai-Woo Chang & Jinwoo Park, 2017. "A Smartness Assessment Framework for Smart Factories Using Analytic Network Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Gautam Dutta & Ravinder Kumar & Rahul Sindhwani & Rajesh Kr. Singh, 2021. "Digitalization priorities of quality control processes for SMEs: a conceptual study in perspective of Industry 4.0 adoption," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1679-1698, August.
    3. Syed Radzi Bin Rahamaddulla & Zulkiflle Leman & B. T. Hang Tuah Bin Baharudin & Siti Azfanizam Ahmad, 2021. "Conceptualizing Smart Manufacturing Readiness-Maturity Model for Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Sameer Mittal & Muztoba Ahmad Khan & Jayant Kishor Purohit & Karan Menon & David Romero & Thorsten Wuest, 2020. "A smart manufacturing adoption framework for SMEs," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(5), pages 1555-1573, March.
    5. Won, Jeong Yeon & Park, Min Jae, 2020. "Smart factory adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises: Empirical evidence of manufacturing industry in Korea," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Zeki Murat Çınar & Qasim Zeeshan & Orhan Korhan, 2021. "A Framework for Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Smart Manufacturing Enterprises: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-32, June.
    7. Violeta Sima & Ileana Georgiana Gheorghe & Jonel Subić & Dumitru Nancu, 2020. "Influences of the Industry 4.0 Revolution on the Human Capital Development and Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Mario Kleindienst & Christian Ramsauer, 2016. "SMEs and Industry 4.0 - Introducing a KPI based Procedure Model to identify Focus Areas in Manufacturing Industry," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 2(2), pages 109-122, April.
    9. Tzu-Chieh Lin & Kung Jeng Wang, 2021. "Project-based maturity assessment model for smart transformation in Taiwanese enterprises," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baishakhi Ganguly & Bikash Koli Dey & Sarla Pareek & Biswajit Sarkar, 2023. "Cost-Effective Imperfect Production-Inventory System under Variable Production Rate and Remanufacturing," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Basim S. O. Alsaedi, 2024. "A Sustainable Supply Chain Model with Variable Production Rate and Remanufacturing for Imperfect Production Inventory System under Learning in Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-49, September.
    3. Kuen-Suan Chen & Tsun-Hung Huang & Chun-Min Yu & Hui-E Lee, 2024. "Fuzzy Evaluation Model for Operational Performance of Air Cleaning Equipment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-12, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arfan Shahzad & Mohd Syarol Azuan bin Zakaria & Herbert Kotzab & Muhammad Abdul Majid Makki & Aamir Hussain & Julia Fischer, 2023. "Adoption of fourth industrial revolution 4.0 among Malaysian small and medium enterprises (SMEs)," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Yen Sheng Tsai & Wei-Hsi Hung, 2023. "A low-cost intelligent tracking system for clothing manufacturers," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 473-491, February.
    3. Feng, Wei & Sun, Shujun & Yuan, Hang, 2023. "Research on the efficiency of factor allocation in the pilot free trade zones," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 727-745.
    4. Julio Henrique Costa Nobrega & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Vasco Sanchez-Rodrigues & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Walter Leal Filho & Milena Pavan Serafim & Rosley Anholon, 2021. "Logistics 4.0 in Brazil: Critical Analysis and Relationships with SDG 9 Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Nadeem, Kashif & Wong, Sut I. & Za, Stefano & Venditti, Michelina, 2024. "Digital transformation and industry 4.0 employees: Empirical evidence from top digital nations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Nikos Kanellos & Marina C. Terzi & Nikolaos T. Giannakopoulos & Panagiotis Karountzos & Damianos P. Sakas, 2024. "The Economic Dynamics of Desktop and Mobile Customer Analytics in Advancing Digital Branding Strategies: Insights from the Agri-Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-28, July.
    7. Tzu-Chieh Lin & Kung Jeng Wang, 2021. "Project-based maturity assessment model for smart transformation in Taiwanese enterprises," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, July.
    8. Bhagwan, N. & Evans, M., 2023. "A review of industry 4.0 technologies used in the production of energy in China, Germany, and South Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. Özköse, Hakan & Güney, Gül, 2023. "The effects of industry 4.0 on productivity: A scientific mapping study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Vendula Laciok & Katerina Sikorova & Bruno Fabiano & Ales Bernatik, 2021. "Trends and Opportunities of Tertiary Education in Safety Engineering Moving towards Safety 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Mohd Zairul & Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh, 2023. "Thematic Trends in Industry 4.0 Revolution Potential towards Sustainability in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Restuning Widiasih & Maria Komariah & Iqbal Pramukti & Raini Diah Susanti & Habsyah Saparidah Agustina & Hidayat Arifin & Yulia Kurniawati & Katherine Nelson, 2022. "VNursLab 3D Simulator: A Web-Based Nursing Skills Simulation of Knowledge of Nursing Skill, Satisfaction, and Self-Confidence among Nursing Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-11, April.
    13. Vitkauskaitė, Elena & Varaniūtė, Viktorija & Bouwman, Harry, 2019. "Evaluating SMEs Readiness to Transform to IoT-Based Business Models," 30th European Regional ITS Conference, Helsinki 2019 205220, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    14. Yanlin Shi & Qingjin Peng, 2023. "Conceptual design of product structures based on WordNet hierarchy and association relation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(6), pages 2655-2671, August.
    15. Hyo Geun Song & Hyeon Jo, 2023. "Understanding the Continuance Intention of Omnichannel: Combining TAM and TPB," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Marie-Anne Le-Dain & Lamiae Benhayoun & Judy Matthews & Marine Liard, 2023. "Barriers and opportunities of digital servitization for SMEs: the effect of smart Product-Service System business models," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(1), pages 359-393, March.
    17. Patricia Andino-González & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda, 2024. "Analyzing Managerial Skills for Employability in Graduate Students in Economics, Administration and Accounting Sciences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Sarah Maggioli & Liliana Cunha, 2023. "A Systematic Review Discussing the Sustainability of Men and Women’s Work in Industry 4.0: Are Technologies Gender-Neutral?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    19. Fuping Bai & Donghui Liu & Kaiyun Dong & Mengting Shang & Aiguo Yan, 2023. "Research on How Executive Connections Affect Enterprise Digital Transformation: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Jian Xu & Jae-Woo Sim, 2018. "Characteristics of Corporate R&D Investment in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Manufacturing Industry in China and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:257:y:2023:i:c:s0925527322003449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.