IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6226-d566974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open Data Based Urban For-Profit Music Venues Spatial Layout Pattern Discovery

Author

Listed:
  • Xueqi Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Cold Region Urban and Rural Human Settlement Environment Science and Technology, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Zhichong Zou

    (Key Laboratory of Cold Region Urban and Rural Human Settlement Environment Science and Technology, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China)

Abstract

The spatial pattern of music venues is one of the key decision-making factors for urban planning and development strategies. Understanding the current configurations and future demands of music venues is fundamental to scholars, planners, and designers. There is an urgent need to discover the spatial pattern of music venues nationwide with high precision. This paper aims at an open data solution to discover the hidden hierarchical structure of the for-profit music venues and their dynamic relationship with urban economies. Data collected from the largest two public ticketing websites are used for clustering-based ranking modeling and spatial pattern discovery of music venues in 28 cities as recorded. The model is based on a multi-stage hierarchical clustering algorithm to level those cities into four groups according to the website records which can be used to describe the total music industry scale and activity vitality of cities. Data collected from the 2018 China City Statistical Year Book, including the GDP per capita, disposable income per capita, the permanent population, and the number of patent applications, are used as socio-economic indicators for the city-level potential capability of music industry development ranking. The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the Kendall rank correlation coefficient are applied to test the consistency of the above city-level rankings. The results are 0.782 and 0.744 respectively, which means there is a relatively significant correlation between the scale level of current music venue configuration and the potential to develop the music industry. Average nearest neighbor index (ANNI), quadrate analysis, and Moran’s I are used to identify the spatial patterns of music venues of individual cities. The results indicate that music venues in urban centers show more spatial aggregation, where the spatial accessibility of music activity services takes the lead significantly, while a certain amount of venues with high service capacity distribute in suburban areas. The findings can provide decision support for urban planners to formulate effective policies and rational site-selection schemes on urban cultural facilities, leading to smart city rational construction and sustainable economic benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Xueqi Wang & Zhichong Zou, 2021. "Open Data Based Urban For-Profit Music Venues Spatial Layout Pattern Discovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6226-:d:566974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6226/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6226/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaolin Liu & Ying Jing & Enxiang Cai & Jiaxing Cui & Yang Zhang & Yiyun Chen, 2017. "How Leisure Venues Are and Why? A Geospatial Perspective in Wuhan, Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Hauke Jan & Kossowski Tomasz, 2011. "Comparison of Values of Pearson's and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 87-93, June.
    3. K M Atikur Rahman & Dunfu Zhang, 2018. "Analyzing the Level of Accessibility of Public Urban Green Spaces to Different Socially Vulnerable Groups of People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, October.
    4. José Grisolía & Kenneth Willis, 2012. "A latent class model of theatre demand," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 36(2), pages 113-139, May.
    5. Danni Wang & Changjian Qiao & Sijie Liu & Chongyang Wang & Ji Yang & Yong Li & Peng Huang, 2020. "Assessment of Spatial Accessibility to Residential Care Facilities in 2020 in Guangzhou by Small-Scale Residential Community Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.
    6. Hailing Xu & Jianghong Zhu & Zhanqi Wang, 2019. "Exploring the Spatial Pattern of Urban Block Development Based on POI Analysis: A Case Study in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    7. Yunfeng Hu & Yueqi Han, 2019. "Identification of Urban Functional Areas Based on POI Data: A Case Study of the Guangzhou Economic and Technological Development Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Paulo Brito & Carlos Barros, 2005. "Learning-by-Consuming and the Dynamics of the Demand and Prices of Cultural Goods," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 29(2), pages 83-106, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessio Emanuele Biondo & Roberto Cellini & Tiziana Cuccia, 2020. "Choices on museum attendance: An agent‐based approach," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 882-897, November.
    2. Agumas Alamirew Mebratu, 2024. "Theoretical foundations of voluntary tax compliance: evidence from a developing country," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Marvao, Catarina & Borowiecki, Karol, 2015. "Dance Participation and Attendance in Denmark," SITE Working Paper Series 33, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics.
    4. Alex Bara & Pierre LeRoux, 2018. "Technology, Financial Innovations and Bank Behavior in a Low Income Country," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(4), pages 221-234.
    5. Bo Liu & Desheng Xue & Yiming Tan, 2019. "Deciphering the Manufacturing Production Space in Global City-Regions of Developing Countries—a Case of Pearl River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Javier García López & Raffaele Sisto & Javier Benayas & Álvaro de Juanes & Julio Lumbreras & Carlos Mataix, 2021. "Assessment of the Results and Methodology of the Sustainable Development Index for Spanish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    7. Pan, Yue & Ou, Shenwei & Zhang, Limao & Zhang, Wenjing & Wu, Xianguo & Li, Heng, 2019. "Modeling risks in dependent systems: A Copula-Bayesian approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 416-431.
    8. Chiadmi, Ines & Traoré, Sidnoma Abdoul Aziz & Salles, Jean-Michel, 2020. "Asian tiger mosquito far from home: Assessing the impact of invasive mosquitoes on the French Mediterranean littoral," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Yuewen Yang & Dongyan Wang & Zhuoran Yan & Shuwen Zhang, 2021. "Delineating Urban Functional Zones Using U-Net Deep Learning: Case Study of Kuancheng District, Changchun, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Adriana Gómez-Cabrera & Amalia Sanz-Benlloch & Laura Montalban-Domingo & Jose Luis Ponz-Tienda & Eugenio Pellicer, 2020. "Identification of Factors Affecting the Performance of Rural Road Projects in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Zehua Wang & Fachao Liang & Sheng-Hau Lin, 2023. "Can socially sustainable development be achieved through homestead withdrawal? A hybrid multiple-attributes decision analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Elisabetta Lazzaro & Carlofilippo Frateschi, 2017. "Couples’ arts participation: assessing individual and joint time use," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(1), pages 47-69, February.
    13. Bouchra Zellou & Hassane Rahali, 2017. "Assessment of reduced-complexity landscape evolution model suitability to adequately simulate flood events in complex flow conditions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(1), pages 1-29, March.
    14. Judit Bar-Ilan & Mark Levene, 2015. "The hw-rank: an h-index variant for ranking web pages," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2247-2253, March.
    15. Louis Lévy-Garboua & Claude Montmarquette, 2011. "Demand," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 26, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Patrik Silva & Lin Li, 2020. "Urban Crime Occurrences in Association with Built Environment Characteristics: An African Case with Implications for Urban Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    17. Ma Zhong & Rong Xu & Xinyi Liao & Shuangli Zhang, 2019. "Do CSR Ratings Converge in China? A Comparison Between RKS and Hexun Scores," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Sun, Long Long & Hu, Ya Peng & Zhu, Chen Ping, 2023. "Scaling invariance in domestic passenger flight delays in the United States," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 611(C).
    19. Yang, Chengyu & Wang, Xupeng, 2023. "Income and cultural consumption in China: A theoretical analysis and a regional empirical evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 102-123.
    20. Loredana Antronico & Roberto Coscarelli & Francesco De Pascale & Dante Di Matteo, 2020. "Climate Change and Social Perception: A Case Study in Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6226-:d:566974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.