IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2020i1p333-d473431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Social Responsibility in the Opinion of Polish and Foreign Students in Management Program of Lublin University of Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Mazur

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

  • Anna Walczyna

    (Department of Strategy and Business Planning, Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

The emergence of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) concept resulted in the introduction of the subject to the curricula of management faculties at many universities worldwide. Business schools and management departments educate future decision-makers of the national and global economy. Therefore, in order to be able to anticipate future development trends in the area of CSR, surveys of students’ opinions on the responsibilities of business toward society are conducted. This study aimed to answer the question about the way in which students prioritize particular dimensions of CSR. In particular, it focuses on whether the respondents consider the economic dimension to be fundamental, given their different socio-cultural contexts. An additional aim of the research is to verify A. Carroll’s original CSR model, as expressed in terms of the economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic dimensions. The research included two groups of students at the Faculty of Management of the Lublin University of Technology—Polish and foreign. The results obtained in both study groups differ from A. Carroll’s original CSR model system. They also differ from each other. In the group of Polish students, the bottom and top dimensions of the pyramid are economic and legal, and in the group of foreign students, they are philanthropic and legal, accordingly. The shapes of the two pyramids are also different, which may be caused by different socio-cultural contexts and specific social needs. The adopted model turned out to be useful for studying the CSR structure expressed in the form of a four-element pyramid. It also allowed the weighting of the perceived importance by the respondents of each individual dimension of CSR. This study helps to predict future corporate social responsibility activities and trends in business.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Mazur & Anna Walczyna, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility in the Opinion of Polish and Foreign Students in Management Program of Lublin University of Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:333-:d:473431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/333/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/333/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicoleta Farcane & Delia Deliu & Eusebiu Bureană, 2019. "A Corporate Case Study: The Application of Rokeach’s Value System to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Ana Teixeira & Marisa R. Ferreira & Aldina Correia & Vanda Lima, 2018. "Students’ perceptions of corporate social responsibility: evidences from a Portuguese higher education institution," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(2), pages 235-252, June.
    3. José-Luis Godos-Díez & Laura Cabeza-García & Cristina Fernández-González, 2018. "Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Internationalisation Strategies: A Descriptive Study in the Spanish Context," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Carroll, Archie B., 1991. "The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 39-48.
    5. Andrew Dobson, 2007. "Environmental citizenship: towards sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 276-285.
    6. Lisa Christensen & Ellen Peirce & Laura Hartman & W. Hoffman & Jamie Carrier, 2007. "Ethics, CSR, and Sustainability Education in the Financial Times Top 50 Global Business Schools: Baseline Data and Future Research Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 347-368, July.
    7. Gaston Fornes & Abel Monfort & Camelia Ilie & Chun Kwong (Tony) Koo & Guillermo Cardoza, 2019. "Ethics, Responsibility, and Sustainability in MBAs. Understanding the Motivations for the Incorporation of ERS in Less Traditional Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Franciane Reinert Lyra & Maria José Barbosa De Souza & Miguel Angel Verdinelli & Jeferson Lana, 2017. "Corporate social responsibility: comparing different models," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 728-742, October.
    9. María González-Rodríguez & María Díaz-Fernández & Marek Pawlak & Biagio Simonetti, 2013. "Perceptions of students university of corporate social responsibility," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 2361-2377, June.
    10. Larrán, Manuel & Andrades, Javier & Herrera, Jesús, 2018. "An examination of attitudes and perceptions of Spanish business and accounting students toward corporate social responsibility and sustainability themes," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 196-205.
    11. Falck, Oliver & Heblich, Stephan, 2007. "Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 247-254.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manoj Anand & Jagandeep Singh, 2021. "Business students’ perception of corporate social responsibility: an exploratory study," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 48(3), pages 261-284, September.
    2. Dolors Setó-Pamies & Eleni Papaoikonomou, 2016. "A Multi-level Perspective for the Integration of Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability (ECSRS) in Management Education," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(3), pages 523-538, July.
    3. Maja Mijatov Ladičorbić & Aleksandra S. Dragin & Tamara Jovanović & Milica Solarević & Olja Munitlak Ivanović & Vladimir Stojanović & Kristina Košić & Anđelija Ivkov Džigurski & Slavica Tomić & Mirosl, 2023. "Tourism Stakeholder Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in Serbia: The Perception of Hotel Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Brian R. Johnson & Eric Connolly & Timothy S. Carter, 2011. "Corporate social responsibility: the role of Fortune 100 companies in domestic and international natural disasters," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 352-369, November.
    5. Yongming Zhang & Mohsen Imeni & Seyyed Ahmad Edalatpanah, 2023. "Environmental Dimension of Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Persistence: An Exploration of the Moderator Roles of Operating Efficiency and Financing Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Lucie Kvasničková Stanislavská & K. Margarisová & K. Šťastná, 2012. "Corporate Social Responsibility in banking sector," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(2), pages 157-164.
    7. Esra Alniacik & Charefeddine Moumen & Umit Alniacik, 2020. "The moderating role of personal value orientation on the links between perceived corporate social performance and purchase intentions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2724-2734, November.
    8. Szymon Cyfert & Waldemar Glabiszewski & Maciej Zastempowski, 2021. "Impact of Management Tools Supporting Industry 4.0 on the Importance of CSR during COVID-19. Generation Z," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Nick Lin-Hi & Igor Blumberg, 2018. "The Link Between (Not) Practicing CSR and Corporate Reputation: Psychological Foundations and Managerial Implications," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 185-198, June.
    10. Bongani Munkuli & Renee Horne, 2018. "Financial Markets Value Reputation for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) – A Study of the South African Mining Sector," Africagrowth Agenda, Africagrowth Institute, vol. 15(2), pages 17-22.
    11. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2017. "Corporate sustainability and responsibility: creating value for business, society and the environment," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 59-74, September.
    12. Debbie Haski-Leventhal & Mehrdokht Pournader & Andrew McKinnon, 2017. "The Role of Gender and Age in Business Students’ Values, CSR Attitudes, and Responsible Management Education: Learnings from the PRME International Survey," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 219-239, November.
    13. Denise Baden, 2016. "A reconstruction of Carroll’s pyramid of corporate social responsibility for the 21st century," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Iskandar Zainuddin Rela & Abd Hair Awang & Zaimah Ramli & Yani Taufik & Sarmila Md Sum & Mahazan Muhammad, 2020. "Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Community Resilience: Empirical Evidence in the Nickel Mining Industry in Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, February.
    15. Camelia-Daniela Hategan & Nicoleta Sirghi & Ruxandra-Ioana Curea-Pitorac & Vasile-Petru Hategan, 2018. "Doing Well or Doing Good: The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profit in Romanian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Larrán Jorge, Manuel & Andrades Peña, Francisco Javier, 2015. "La oferta de asignaturas de responsabilidad social corporativa y ética empresarial en las titulaciones de finanzas y contabilidad: análisis comparativo con el ámbito de la gestión de organizaciones," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 1-10.
    17. Mahalaxmi Adhikariparajuli & Abeer Hassan & Benedetta Siboni, 2021. "CSR Implication and Disclosure in Higher Education: Uncovered Points. Results from a Systematic Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    18. Jae-Bin Cha & Mi-Na Jo, 2019. "The Effect of the Corporate Social Responsibility of Franchise Coffee Shops on Corporate Image and Behavioral Intention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Irena Slavova & Yovka Bankova, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility In Business And Management University Education: The Relevancy To The Business Practices In Bulgaria," European Journal of Business and Economics, Central Bohemia University, vol. 10(2), pages 6971:10-697, January.
    20. Sara Rodriguez-Gomez & Maria Lourdes Arco-Castro & Maria Victoria Lopez-Perez & Lazaro Rodríguez-Ariza, 2020. "Where Does CSR Come from and Where Does It Go? A Review of the State of the Art," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2020:i:1:p:333-:d:473431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.