IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4010-d1076994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tourism Stakeholder Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in Serbia: The Perception of Hotel Employees

Author

Listed:
  • Maja Mijatov Ladičorbić

    (Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Aleksandra S. Dragin

    (Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
    Novi Sad School of Business, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Tamara Jovanović

    (Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Milica Solarević

    (Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Olja Munitlak Ivanović

    (Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Vladimir Stojanović

    (Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
    Novi Sad School of Business, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Kristina Košić

    (Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Anđelija Ivkov Džigurski

    (Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Slavica Tomić

    (Faculty of Economics in Subotica, University of Novi Sad, 24000 Subotica, Serbia)

  • Miroslav D. Vujičić

    (Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Milena Nedeljković Knežević

    (Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Ivana Blešić

    (Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
    Institute of Sports, Tourism and Service, South Ural State University, 76 Lenin Ave., Chelyabinsk 454080, Russia)

  • Željko Anđelković

    (National Museum Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia)

  • Zrinka Zadel

    (Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia)

  • Jelena Tepavčević

    (Faculty of Sciences, Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Aleksandra Stoiljković

    (Faculty of Economics in Subotica, University of Novi Sad, 24000 Subotica, Serbia)

Abstract

Individual values shaped in the early years of each individual might be reflected in the perception of the business environment. Therefore, this research explored whether there are significant differences in employees’ perceptions of the established dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR), namely philanthropic, legal, economic and ethical, based on differences in the importance of individual values (IV). The research results show that each of the CSR dimensions differs according to the respondents’ IVs. More precisely, there are significant differences in the respondents’ perceptions of the philanthropic dimension of CSR based on differences in the evaluation of sense of belonging, warm relationships, being well respected, fun and enjoyment of life, security, self-respect and sense of accomplishment. Differences in perceptions of the legal dimension of CSR exist only in the case of differences in the evaluation of self-respect. The research results also show that there are significant differences in perceptions of the economic dimension of CSR, based on differences in the evaluation of sense of belonging, warm relationships, fun and enjoyment in life, security, self-respect and sense of accomplishment. Finally, significant differences in the perception of the ethical dimension of CSR exist in the case of differences in sense of belonging, excitement, warm relationships, being well respected, fun and enjoyment of life, security, self-respect and sense of accomplishment. The results could provide the basis of information on how IVs can motivate employees to understand and participate in the proactive management of CSR activities in sensitive environments, such as national parks or other protected areas that become a central meeting place for tourists and employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Maja Mijatov Ladičorbić & Aleksandra S. Dragin & Tamara Jovanović & Milica Solarević & Olja Munitlak Ivanović & Vladimir Stojanović & Kristina Košić & Anđelija Ivkov Džigurski & Slavica Tomić & Mirosl, 2023. "Tourism Stakeholder Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in Serbia: The Perception of Hotel Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4010-:d:1076994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4010/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4010/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cinthia Leonora Murillo‐Avalos & Mitzi Cubilla‐Montilla & Miguel Ángel Celestino Sánchez & Purificación Vicente‐Galindo, 2021. "What environmental social responsibility practices do large companies manage for sustainable development?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 153-168, January.
    2. Carroll, Archie B., 2000. "Ethical Challenges for Business in the New Millennium: Corporate Social Responsibility and Models of Management Morality," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 33-42, January.
    3. Simona Činčalová & Veronika Hedija, 2020. "Firm Characteristics and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Case of Czech Transportation and Storage Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Carroll, Archie B., 1991. "The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 39-48.
    5. Baobao Song & Jing (Taylor) Wen, 2020. "Online corporate social responsibility communication strategies and stakeholder engagements: A comparison of controversial versus noncontroversial industries," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 881-896, March.
    6. Ina Freeman & Amir Hasnaoui, 2011. "The Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Vision of Four Nations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 419-443, May.
    7. Newman, Carol & Rand, John & Tarp, Finn & Trifkovic, Neda, 2018. "The transmission of socially responsible behaviour through international trade," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 250-267.
    8. Yuanyuan Zhang & Zhe Ouyang, 2021. "Doing well by doing good: How corporate environmental responsibility influences corporate financial performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 54-63, January.
    9. Falck, Oliver & Heblich, Stephan, 2007. "Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 247-254.
    10. Ivana Blešic & Aleksandra Dragin & Jelica Markovic & Slobodan Cerovic and Lukrecija Deri, 2014. "Relationships among Shopping Quality and Corporate Social Responsibility of Shopping Centers and Consumer Satisfaction: Case from Novi Sad (Serbia)," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(35), pages 415-415, February.
    11. Evans Asante Boadi & Zheng He & Josephine Bosompem & Christian Narh Opata & Eric Kofi Boadi, 2020. "Employees’ perception of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its effects on internal outcomes," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(9-10), pages 611-632, July.
    12. Dariusz Tworzydło & Sławomir Gawroński & Przemysław Szuba, 2021. "Importance and role of CSR and stakeholder engagement strategy in polish companies in the context of activities of experts handling public relations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 64-70, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Gangi & Eugenio D’Angelo, 2017. "“Make”or “Buy” the Choice of Governance Modes for Corporate Social Responsibility Projects from a Stakeholder Management Perspective," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(8), pages 80-92, August.
    2. Francesco Gangi & Mario Mustilli & Nicola Varrone & Lucia Michela Daniele, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Banks’ Financial Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 42-58, October.
    3. Muhamad Azrin Nazri & Nor Asiah Omar & Aini Aman & Abu Hanifah Ayob & Nur Ainna Ramli, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Performance in Takaful Agencies: The Moderating Role of Objective Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Brian R. Johnson & Eric Connolly & Timothy S. Carter, 2011. "Corporate social responsibility: the role of Fortune 100 companies in domestic and international natural disasters," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 352-369, November.
    5. Yu Jin Chang & Jae Wook Yoo, 2023. "When CSR Matters: The Moderating Effect of Industrial Growth Rate on the Relationship between CSR and Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Zainab Al Mubarak & Anji Ben Hamed & Muneer Al Mubarak, 2018. "Impact of corporate social responsibility on bank’s corporate image," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(5), pages 710-722, November.
    7. Siqi Che & Rongting Li, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of BYD and Tesla’s CSR Image Construction through CSR Reports," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(4), pages 106-106, July.
    8. Shilong Wei & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Ubaldo Comite & Phung Anh Thu & Daniel Badulescu & József Popp, 2021. "An Examination to Explain the Mechanism of Employees’ Environment-Specific Behavior through CSR and Work Engagement from the Perspective of Stewardship Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Khoa T. Tran & Phuong V. Nguyen, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Findings from the Vietnamese Paint Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Yongming Zhang & Mohsen Imeni & Seyyed Ahmad Edalatpanah, 2023. "Environmental Dimension of Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Persistence: An Exploration of the Moderator Roles of Operating Efficiency and Financing Cost," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Oyewole Simon Oginni & Adewale Daniel Omojowo, 2016. "Sustainable Development and Corporate Social Responsibility in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Industries in Cameroon," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Lucie Kvasničková Stanislavská & K. Margarisová & K. Šťastná, 2012. "Corporate Social Responsibility in banking sector," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(2), pages 157-164.
    13. Karikari Timothy Kwakye & Shimin Liu, 2024. "The Effect of Philanthropic Corporate Social Responsibility on Local CSR Awareness: Examining the Role of Corporate Transparency in Ghana," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 33(1), pages 105-122.
    14. Samar El Sayad & Ahmed Diab, 2022. "Bank Employee Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices: Evidence from Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-32, February.
    15. Gaëlle Redon & Leïla Loussaief, 2017. "La communication des Grandes Écoles françaises sur la question de la diversité," Post-Print hal-01856603, HAL.
    16. Nick Lin-Hi & Igor Blumberg, 2018. "The Link Between (Not) Practicing CSR and Corporate Reputation: Psychological Foundations and Managerial Implications," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 185-198, June.
    17. Gangi, Francesco & Meles, Antonio & Monferrà, Stefano & Mustilli, Mario, 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility help the survivorship of SMEs and large firms?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    18. Riillo, Cesare Fabio Antonio & Sarracino, Francesco, 2014. "Motivations for Corporate Social Responsibility: all talk and no walk?," MPRA Paper 60211, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. repec:cte:wbrepe:wb130301 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Ghi-Feng Yen & Hui-Chun Tsao, 2020. "Reexamining Consumers’ Cognition and Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility via a DANP and IPA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-26, January.
    21. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2021. "The Employees’ State of Mind during COVID-19: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4010-:d:1076994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.