IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3817-d355127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison between Romania and Sweden Based on Three Dimensions: Environmental Performance, Green Taxation and Economic Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Roxana Maria Bădîrcea

    (Department of Finance, Banking and Economic Analysis, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 13 A.I. Cuza, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Nicoleta Mihaela Florea

    (Department of Finance, Banking and Economic Analysis, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 13 A.I. Cuza, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Alina Georgiana Manta

    (Department of Finance, Banking and Economic Analysis, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 13 A.I. Cuza, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Silvia Puiu

    (Department of Management, Marketing and Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 13 A.I. Cuza, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

  • Marius Dalian Doran

    (Doctoral School of Economic Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Craiova, 13 A.I. Cuza, 200585 Craiova, Romania)

Abstract

One of the European Union’s (EU) objectives regarding climate change is a 40% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, ensuring that member states focus on sustainable development. The aim of this study was the comparison of a three-dimensional relationship between green taxation, environmental performance and economic growth for the time period between 1995 and 2017 in Romania and Sweden. The novelty consists of simultaneously using the double dividend theory and environmental Kuznets curve theory for Romania. The autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) method was used for testing the cointegration relationship. The Granger causality estimation based on the ARDL-error correction model was applied to identify the causality relationship between the variables and the pairwise Granger causality test to detect the direction of causality. The implementation of the tests led to the conclusion that environmental taxes will have a significant influence on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the long run in both Romania and Sweden, while in the short run, no such influence will be noticed. Also, in Romania, in the long term, there was a bidirectional causality relationship between economic growth and greenhouse gas emissions, while in Sweden, the causality relationship was from economic growth to greenhouse gas emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Nicoleta Mihaela Florea & Alina Georgiana Manta & Silvia Puiu & Marius Dalian Doran, 2020. "Comparison between Romania and Sweden Based on Three Dimensions: Environmental Performance, Green Taxation and Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3817-:d:355127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3817/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3817/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesco Ricci, 2007. "Channels of transmission of environmental policy to economic growth," Post-Print hal-03062228, HAL.
    2. Sebastian Miller & Mauricio Vela, 2013. "Are Environmentally Related Taxes Effective?," Research Department Publications IDB-WP-467, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    3. A. Lans Bovenberg & Frederick van der Ploeg, 2002. "Environmental Policy, Public Finance and the Labour Market in a Second-Best World," Chapters, in: Lawrence H. Goulder (ed.), Environmental Policy Making in Economies with Prior Tax Distortions, chapter 6, pages 112-153, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Lans Bovenberg, A. & Smulders, Sjak, 1995. "Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 369-391, July.
    5. repec:agr:journl:v:1(602):y:2015:i:1(602):p:85-96 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Ricci, Francesco, 2007. "Channels of transmission of environmental policy to economic growth: A survey of the theory," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 688-699, February.
    7. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin & Richard J. Smith, 2001. "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 289-326.
    8. Lee, Dwight R. & Misiolek, Walter S., 1986. "Substituting pollution taxation for general taxation: Some implications for efficiency in pollutions taxation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 338-347, December.
    9. Lans Bovenberg, A. & de Mooij, Ruud A., 1997. "Environmental tax reform and endogenous growth," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 207-237, January.
    10. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Mutascu, Mihai & Azim, Parvez, 2013. "Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy consumption," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 165-173.
    11. A. Lans Bovenberg & Frederick van der Ploeg, 2002. "Environmental Policy, Public Finance and the Labour Market in a Second-Best World," Chapters, in: Lawrence H. Goulder (ed.), Environmental Policy Making in Economies with Prior Tax Distortions, chapter 6, pages 112-153, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Pearce, David W, 1991. "The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 101(407), pages 938-948, July.
    13. Pegels, Anna, 2016. "Taxing carbon as an instrument of green industrial policy in developing countries," IDOS Discussion Papers 23/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    14. Daniel Armeanu & Georgeta Vintilă & Jean Vasile Andrei & Ştefan Cristian Gherghina & Mihaela Cristina Drăgoi & Cristian Teodor, 2018. "Exploring the link between environmental pollution and economic growth in EU-28 countries: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-28, May.
    15. Magdalena Radulescu & Crenguta Ileana Sinisi & Constanta Popescu & Silvia Elena Iacob & Luigi Popescu, 2017. "Environmental Tax Policy in Romania in the Context of the EU: Double Dividend Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-20, October.
    16. Tafirenyika Sunde, 2018. "The interaction of energy consumption and economic growth in South Africa: assessment from the bounds testing approach," International Journal of Sustainable Economy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 170-183.
    17. Dorin JULA & Corina-Ionela DUMITRESCU & Ioana-Ruxandra LIE & Răzvan-Mihai DOBRESCU, 2015. "Environmental Kuznets curve. Evidence from Romania," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(1(602), S), pages 85-96, Spring.
    18. Sebastian Miller & Mauricio Vela, 2013. "Are Environmentally Related Taxes Effective?," Research Department Publications IDB-WP-467, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    19. Sheilla Nyasha & N.M. Odhiambo, 2015. "Economic growth and market-based financial systems: a review," Studies in Economics and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(2), pages 235-255, June.
    20. Schlegelmilch, Kai & Cottrell, Jacqueline & Runkel, Matthias & Mahler, Alexander, 2016. "Environmental tax reform in developing, emerging and transition economies," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 93, number 93, March.
    21. Pao, Hsiao-Tien & Tsai, Chung-Ming, 2011. "Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, I," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 685-693.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anita Fajczak-Kowalska & Anna Misztal & Magdalena Kowalska, 2021. "Energy, Pollution, and Transport Taxes as Instruments of Sustainable Development of Manufacturing Enterprises in Emerging Economies in the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2 - Part ), pages 724-742.
    2. Jean Niyigaba & Jessica Ya Sun & Daiyan Peng & Clemence Uwimbabazi, 2020. "Agriculture and Green Economy for Environmental Kuznets Curve Adoption in Developing Countries: Insights from Rwanda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Daniela Melania Mihai & Marius Dalian Doran & Silvia Puiu & Nicoleta Mihaela Doran & Elena Jianu & Teodor Marian Cojocaru, 2023. "Managing Environmental Policy Stringency to Ensure Sustainable Development in OECD Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Marius Dalian Doran & Maria Magdalena Poenaru & Alexandra Lucia Zaharia & Sorana Vătavu & Oana Ramona Lobonț, 2022. "Fiscal Policy, Growth, Financial Development and Renewable Energy in Romania: An Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model with Evidence for Growth Hypothesis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Marin OPRIÈšESCU & Roxana Maria BÄ‚DÃŽRCEA & Nicoleta Mihaela FLOREA & Alina Georgiana MANTA & Silvia PUIU & Dalian Marius DORAN, 2020. "The Impact of Blue Economy and Economic Growth on Climate Changes in Baltic Countries," Finante - provocarile viitorului (Finance - Challenges of the Future), University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(22), pages 7-20, November.
    6. Anca Vasilica Tănasie & Luiza Loredana Năstase & Luminița Lucia Vochița & Andra Maria Manda & Geanina Iulia Boțoteanu & Cătălina Soriana Sitnikov, 2022. "Green Economy—Green Jobs in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    7. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:724-742 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Liton Chandra Voumik & Shohel Md. Nafi & Festus Victor Bekun & Murat Ismet Haseki, 2023. "Modeling Energy, Education, Trade, and Tourism-Induced Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Hypothesis: Evidence from the Middle East," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Norouzi, Nima & Fani, Maryam & Talebi, Saeed, 2022. "Green tax as a path to greener economy: A game theory approach on energy and final goods in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Nino Stameski & Magdalena Radulescu & Vera Zelenović & Vera Mirović & Branimir Kalaš & Nataša Pavlović, 2024. "Investigating the Effects of Environmental Tax Revenues on Economic Development: The Case of Nordic Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    11. Gabriela Badareu & Nicoleta Mihaela Doran & Silvia Puiu & Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Alina Georgiana Manta, 2023. "Is the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility, Environment and Energy Sufficiently Debated Nowadays?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Manta, Alina Georgiana & Doran, Nicoleta Mihaela & Bădîrcea, Roxana Maria & Badareu, Gabriela & Țăran, Alexandra Mădălina, 2023. "Does the implementation of a Pigouvian tax be considered an effective approach to address climate change mitigation?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1719-1731.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2001. "Le double dividende. Les approches théoriques," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 16(2), pages 119-147.
    2. Sunde, Tafirenyika, 2018. "Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve and the Role of Energy Consumption: The Case of Namibia," MPRA Paper 86507, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Lawrence Goulder, 1995. "Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader's guide," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 2(2), pages 157-183, August.
    4. Chiroleu-Assouline, Mireille & Fodha, Mouez, 2006. "Double dividend hypothesis, golden rule and welfare distribution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 323-335, May.
    5. Oueslati, Walid, 2013. "Short and Long-term Effects of Environmental Tax Reform," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 146354, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    6. Hoel, Michael, 2008. "Environmental Taxes in an Economy with Distorting Taxes and a Heterogeneous Population," Memorandum 04/2008, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    7. Mahmoud Hassan & Walid Oueslati & Damien Rousselière, 2020. "Exploring the link between energy based taxes and economic growth," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 22(1), pages 67-87, January.
    8. Jan Siegmeier & Linus Mattauch & Max Franks & David Klenert & Anselm Schultes & Ottmar Edenhofer, 2015. "A Public Finance Perspective on Climate Policy: Six Interactions That May Enhance Welfare," Working Papers 2015.31, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Oueslati, Walid, 2015. "Growth and welfare effects of environmental tax reform and public spending policy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 1-13.
    10. Thomas Sadler, 2001. "Environmental taxation in an optimal tax framework," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 29(2), pages 215-231, June.
    11. Søren Nielsen & Lars Pedersen & Peter Sørensen, 1995. "Environmental policy, pollution, unemployment, and endogenous growth," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 2(2), pages 185-205, August.
    12. Ian W. H. Parry, 2003. "Fiscal Interactions and the Case for Carbon Taxes Over Grandfathered Carbon Permits," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 19(3), pages 385-399.
    13. Schöb, Ronnie, 2009. "Climate policy: choosing the right instrument to reap an additional employment dividend," Discussion Papers 2009/10, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    14. Oueslati, Walid, 2014. "Environmental tax reform: Short-term versus long-term macroeconomic effects," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 190-201.
    15. Borissov, Kirill & Brausmann, Alexandra & Bretschger, Lucas, 2019. "Carbon pricing, technology transition, and skill-based development," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 252-269.
    16. Nakabayashi, Masanari, 2010. "Optimal tax rules and public sector efficiency with an externality in an overlapping generations model," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(11-12), pages 1028-1040, December.
    17. William Jaeger, 2011. "The Welfare Effects of Environmental Taxation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 49(1), pages 101-119, May.
    18. William K. Jaeger, 2002. "Carbon Taxation When Climate Affects Productivity," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 78(3), pages 354-367.
    19. A. Lans Bovenberg & Lawrence H. Goulder, 1995. "Costs of Environmentally Motivated Taxes in the Presence of Other Taxes:General Equilibrium Analyses," NBER Working Papers 5117, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Bovenberg, A Lans & Goulder, Lawrence H, 1996. "Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes: General-Equilibrium Analyses," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(4), pages 985-1000, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3817-:d:355127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.