IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i9p3566-d351214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Effects of Strengthening Building Energy Policy on Multifamily Residential Buildings in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Byung Chang Kwag

    (Center for Housing Environment Research and Innovation of the Korea Land and Housing Institute, Sejong 30065, Korea)

  • Sanghee Han

    (Center for Housing Environment Research and Innovation of the Korea Land and Housing Institute, Sejong 30065, Korea)

  • Gil Tae Kim

    (Center for Housing Environment Research and Innovation of the Korea Land and Housing Institute, Sejong 30065, Korea)

  • Beobjeon Kim

    (Center for Housing Environment Research and Innovation of the Korea Land and Housing Institute, Sejong 30065, Korea)

  • Jong Yeob Kim

    (Center for Housing Environment Research and Innovation of the Korea Land and Housing Institute, Sejong 30065, Korea)

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to overview the building-energy policy and regulations in South Korea to achieve energy-efficient multifamily residential buildings and analyze the effects of strengthening the building design requirements on their energy performances. The building energy demand intensity showed a linear relationship with the area-weighted average U-values of the building envelope. However, improving the thermal properties of the building envelope was limited to reducing the building-energy demand intensity. In this study, the effects of various energy conservation measures (ECMs) on the building-energy performance were compared. Among the various ECMs, improving the boiler efficiency was found to be the most efficient measure for reducing the building-energy consumption in comparison to other ECMs, whereas the building envelope showed the least impact, because the current U-values are low. However, in terms of the primary energy consumption, the most efficient ECM was the lighting power density because of the different energy sources used by various ECMs and the different conversion factors used to calculate the primary energy consumption based on the source type. This study showed a direction for updating the building-energy policy and regulations, as well as the potential of implementing ECMs, to improve the energy performances of Korean multifamily residential buildings.

Suggested Citation

  • Byung Chang Kwag & Sanghee Han & Gil Tae Kim & Beobjeon Kim & Jong Yeob Kim, 2020. "Analysis of the Effects of Strengthening Building Energy Policy on Multifamily Residential Buildings in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3566-:d:351214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3566/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/9/3566/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baek, Cheonghoon & Park, Sanghoon, 2012. "Policy measures to overcome barriers to energy renovation of existing buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 3939-3947.
    2. Ihm, Pyeongchan & Park, Lyool & Krarti, Moncef & Seo, Donghyun, 2012. "Impact of window selection on the energy performance of residential buildings in South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-9.
    3. Chandel, S.S. & Sharma, Aniket & Marwaha, Bhanu M., 2016. "Review of energy efficiency initiatives and regulations for residential buildings in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1443-1458.
    4. Tae-Keun Oh & Donghwan Lee & Minsoo Park & Gichun Cha & Seunghee Park, 2018. "Three-Dimensional Visualization Solution to Building-Energy Diagnosis for Energy Feedback," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Sadineni, Suresh B. & France, Todd M. & Boehm, Robert F., 2011. "Economic feasibility of energy efficiency measures in residential buildings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2925-2931.
    6. Tae, Sungho & Shin, Sungwoo, 2009. "Current work and future trends for sustainable buildings in South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 1910-1921, October.
    7. Hyojin Lim & Sungho Tae & Seungjun Roh, 2018. "Analysis of the Primary Building Materials in Support of G-SEED Life Cycle Assessment in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Duk Joon Park & Ki Hyung Yu & Yong Sang Yoon & Kee Han Kim & Sun Sook Kim, 2015. "Analysis of a Building Energy Efficiency Certification System in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-22, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kang, Hyuna & An, Jongbaek & Kim, Hakpyeong & Ji, Changyoon & Hong, Taehoon & Lee, Seunghye, 2021. "Changes in energy consumption according to building use type under COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Pedone, Livio & Molaioni, Filippo & Vallati, Andrea & Pampanin, Stefano, 2023. "Energy refurbishment planning of Italian school buildings using data-driven predictive models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong, Taehoon & Koo, Choongwan & Kim, Hyunjoong & Seon Park, Hyo, 2014. "Decision support model for establishing the optimal energy retrofit strategy for existing multi-family housing complexes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 157-169.
    2. Mustaffa, Nur Kamaliah & Kudus, Sakhiah Abdul, 2022. "Challenges and way forward towards best practices of energy efficient building in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    3. Fabrizio M. Amoruso & Min-Hee Sonn & Soyeon Chu & Thorsten Schuetze, 2021. "Sustainable Building Legislation and Incentives in Korea: A Case-Study-Based Comparison of Building New and Renovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-41, April.
    4. Lee, Junsoo & Kim, Tae Wan & Koo, Choongwan, 2022. "A novel process model for developing a scalable room-level energy benchmark using real-time bigdata: Focused on identifying representative energy usage patterns," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Hye Gi Kim & Sun Sook Kim, 2020. "Occupants’ Awareness of and Satisfaction with Green Building Technologies in a Certified Office Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Kim, Min-Hwi & Kim, Deukwon & Heo, Jaehyeok & Lee, Dong-Won, 2020. "Energy performance investigation of net plus energy town: Energy balance of the Jincheon Eco-Friendly energy town," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1784-1800.
    7. Giorgio Baldinelli & Agnieszka Lechowska & Francesco Bianchi & Jacek Schnotale, 2020. "Sensitivity Analysis of Window Frame Components Effect on Thermal Transmittance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-12, June.
    8. Kristina Mjörnell & Paula Femenías & Kerstin Annadotter, 2019. "Renovation Strategies for Multi-Residential Buildings from the Record Years in Sweden—Profit-Driven or Socioeconomically Responsible?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Mi-Su Shin & Kyu-Nam Rhee & Ji-Yong Yu & Gun-Joo Jung, 2017. "Determination of Equivalent Thermal Conductivity of Window Spacers in Consideration of Condensation Prevention and Energy Saving Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Seok-Hyun Kim & Hakgeun Jeong & Soo Cho, 2019. "A Study on Changes of Window Thermal Performance by Analysis of Physical Test Results in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Alizadeh, Reza & Gharizadeh Beiragh, Ramin & Soltanisehat, Leili & Soltanzadeh, Elham & Lund, Peter D., 2020. "Performance evaluation of complex electricity generation systems: A dynamic network-based data envelopment analysis approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    12. Jam Shahzaib Khan & Rozana Zakaria & Siti Mazzuana Shamsudin & Nur Izie Adiana Abidin & Shaza Rina Sahamir & Darul Nafis Abbas & Eeydzah Aminudin, 2019. "Evolution to Emergence of Green Buildings: A Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Kim, Rakhyun & Tae, Sungho & Roh, Seungjun, 2017. "Development of low carbon durability design for green apartment buildings in South Korea," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 263-272.
    14. Osunmuyiwa, Olufolahan O. & Peacock, Andrew D. & Payne, Sarah R. & Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P. & Jenkins, David P., 2021. "Divergent imaginaries? Co-producing practitioner and householder perspective to cooling demand response in India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    15. Lee, Junghun & Yoo, Seunghwan & Kim, Jonghun & Song, Doosam & Jeong, Hakgeun, 2018. "Improvements to the customer baseline load (CBL) using standard energy consumption considering energy efficiency and demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1052-1063.
    16. Simeng Li & Yanqiu Cui & Nerija Banaitienė & Chunlu Liu & Mark B. Luther, 2021. "Sensitivity Analysis for Carbon Emissions of Prefabricated Residential Buildings with Window Design Elements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, October.
    17. Hao, Han & Liu, Zongwei & Zhao, Fuquan, 2017. "An overview of energy efficiency standards in China's transport sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 246-256.
    18. Sadineni, Suresh B. & Madala, Srikanth & Boehm, Robert F., 2011. "Passive building energy savings: A review of building envelope components," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3617-3631.
    19. Halawa, Edward & Ghaffarianhoseini, Amirhosein & Ghaffarianhoseini, Ali & Trombley, Jeremy & Hassan, Norhaslina & Baig, Mirza & Yusoff, Safiah Yusmah & Azzam Ismail, Muhammad, 2018. "A review on energy conscious designs of building façades in hot and humid climates: Lessons for (and from) Kuala Lumpur and Darwin," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2147-2161.
    20. Wang, Xiaotong & Lu, Meijun & Mao, Wei & Ouyang, Jinlong & Zhou, Bo & Yang, Yunkai, 2015. "Improving benefit-cost analysis to overcome financing difficulties in promoting energy-efficient renovation of existing residential buildings in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 119-130.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:9:p:3566-:d:351214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.