IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i5p2101-d330254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Structured Feedback on Performance: the Role of Attitude and Perceived Usefulness

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Cheah

    (School of Business, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119245, Singapore)

  • Shiyu Li

    (School of Business, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119245, Singapore)

Abstract

In higher education, university students need to be equipped with the necessary knowledge and skills for their future workplace. Companies provide opportunities for students to participate as trainee consultants in innovation-related projects as a form of experiential learning. We designed a quasi-experimental study to investigate how supervisors’ structured feedback can influence students’ learning and project performance. We recruited 28 business school final year undergraduates who formed teams of four students either by themselves or with the help of the school. We randomly assigned three teams with 12 students to the treatment group and four teams of 16 students to the control group. In the treatment group, company supervisors were asked to provide structured written feedback for the treatment group using structured feedback forms, which focus students’ attention on task level, process level, and self-regulation level at three project milestone stages. In the control group, students received feedback from company supervisors without any feedback form. At the end of this project, a survey was conducted to measure students’ attitudes toward feedback in supporting learning and their perceived usefulness of company supervisors’ feedback. The results show that company supervisors’ structured feedback positively affected students’ overall project performance in presentation and report, and students’ positive attitudes toward feedback and perceived usefulness of company supervisor’s structured feedback are positively related to students’ report performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Cheah & Shiyu Li, 2020. "The Effect of Structured Feedback on Performance: the Role of Attitude and Perceived Usefulness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:2101-:d:330254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/2101/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/5/2101/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Cheah & Shiyu li & Yuen-Ping Ho, 2019. "Mutual Support, Role Breadth Self-Efficacy, and Sustainable Job Performance of Workers in Young Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Cheah, Sarah Lai-Yin & Ho, Yuen-Ping, 2020. "Effective industrial policy implementation for open innovation: The role of government resources and capabilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    3. Earley, P. Christopher, 1988. "Computer-generated performance feedback in the magazine-subscription industry," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 50-64, February.
    4. Adolfo Cazorla-Montero & Ignacio de los Ríos-Carmenado & Juan Ignacio Pasten, 2019. "Sustainable Development Planning: Master’s Based on a Project-Based Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    5. He-Hai Liu & Qi Wang & Yu-Sheng Su & Liang Zhou, 2019. "Effects of Project-Based Learning on Teachers’ Information Teaching Sustainability and Ability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Chi-Cheng Chang & Chin-Guo Kuo & Yu-Hsuan Chang, 2018. "An Assessment Tool Predicts Learning Effectiveness for Project-Based Learning in Enhancing Education of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Ana C. Urquidi-Martín & Carmen Tamarit-Aznar & Javier Sánchez-García, 2019. "Determinants of the Effectiveness of Using Renewable Resource Management-Based Simulations in the Development of Critical Thinking: An Application of the Experiential Learning Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youkyung Ko & Hwaneui Lee & Sunghyup Sean Hyun, 2021. "Airline Cabin Crew Team System’s Positive Evaluation Factors and Their Impact on Personal Health and Team Potency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-20, October.
    2. Alder, G. Stoney & Ambrose, Maureen L., 2005. "An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 161-177, July.
    3. Lorenz Probst, 2022. "Higher Education for Sustainability: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence 2013–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-24, March.
    4. Setiyo & Yatim Riyanto & Luthfiyah Nurlaela, 2019. "Cognitive Apprenticeship Improves Self Efficacy At Aviation Polytechnic Of Surabaya," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 10(1), pages 9-11.
    5. Aalberts, Robert J. & Hames, David S. & Thistle, Paul D., 2009. "Detours and frolics on the Internet: Employer liability and management control of cybertorts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(12), pages 1335-1341, December.
    6. Lai-Yin Cheah, Sarah & Ho, Yuen-Ping & Li, Shiyu, 2021. "Search strategy, innovation and financial performance of firms in process industries," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Adolfo Cazorla-Montero & Ignacio De los Ríos-Carmenado, 2023. "From “Putting the Last First” to “Working with People” in Rural Development Planning: A Bibliometric Analysis of 50 Years of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.
    8. Maria-Mar Fernandez-Antolin & José-Manuel del-Río & Fernando del Ama Gonzalo & Roberto-Alonso Gonzalez-Lezcano, 2020. "The Relationship between the Use of Building Performance Simulation Tools by Recent Graduate Architects and the Deficiencies in Architectural Education," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Kim, Jong-Seok & Kim, Byung-Keun, 2022. "Examining different technology transfer capabilities and their counterpart works from two different positions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Panina, Daria & Aiello, John R., 2005. "Acceptance of electronic monitoring and its consequences in different cultural contexts: A conceptual model," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 269-292, June.
    11. Yanwei Lyu & Jinning Zhang & Fei Yang & Di Wu, 2022. "The “Local Neighborhood” Effect of Environmental Regulation on Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    12. El Maalouf, Nicole & Bahemia, Hanna, 2023. "The implementation of inbound open innovation at the firm level: A dynamic capability perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    13. Sharma, Abhijit & Sousa, Cristina & Woodward, Richard, 2022. "Determinants of innovation outcomes: The role of institutional quality," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    14. Teen-Hang Meen & Charles Tijus & Jui-Che Tu, 2019. "Selected Papers from the Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Figen Akça, 2019. "Sustainable Development in Teacher Education in Terms of Being Solution Oriented and Self-Efficacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, December.
    16. McCalley, L. T. & Midden, Cees J. H., 2002. "Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: The roles of goal-setting and social orientation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 589-603, October.
    17. Yildirim, Ercan & AR, Ilker Murat & Dabić, Marina & Baki, Birdogan & Peker, Iskender, 2022. "A multi-stage decision making model for determining a suitable innovation structure using an open innovation approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 379-391.
    18. Kafka, Kyriaki I. & Kostis, Pantelis C., 2024. "Unravelling the innovation puzzle: The interplay between uncertainty, economic institutions, and innovation performance in advanced and developing economies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    19. Liyuan Wang & Tianyi Xie, 2023. "Double-Edged Sword Effect of Flexible Work Arrangements on Employee Innovation Performance: From the Demands–Resources–Individual Effects Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, June.
    20. Pan, Xin & Chen, Xuanjin & Qiu, Shumin, 2024. "Pushing boundaries or overstepping? Exploring the paradoxical impact of radical innovation on government subsidies in Chinese SMEs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:5:p:2101-:d:330254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.